Skip to content

Sperm Selection and Embryo Development: Comparison of the Density Gradient Centrifugation and Microfluidic Chip Sperm Preparation Methods Sperm Selection and Embryo Development: Comparison of the Density Gradient Centrifugation and Microfluidic Chip Sperm Preparation Methods

Sperm Selection and Embryo Development: Comparison of the Density Gradient Centrifugation and Microfluidic Chip Sperm Preparation Methods

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04962074
Enrollment
22
Registered
2021-07-14
Start date
2020-01-05
Completion date
2020-09-20
Last updated
2021-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astheno Teratozoospermia, ICSI, IVF, Reduced Sperm Motility

Keywords

Sperm, IVF, ICSI, Abnormal morphology of sperm, Astheno Teratozoospermia, Microfluidic chip

Brief summary

Purpose: To compare the effects of the density gradient centrifugation and microfluidic chip sperm preparation methods on embryo development in a study population with astheno-teratozoospermia. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, the semen samples of the patients with astheno-teratozoospermia were divided into two groups for preparation with either the microfluidic or density gradient methods. Selected spermatozoa were used to fertilize the mature sibling oocytes. Semen parameters and embryo development on days 3 and 5 were assessed.

Interventions

DEVICEMicrofluidic sperm sorting chip

Fertile Ultimate® (Koek Biotechnology, Turkey) microfluidic sperm sorting chips

DEVICEDensity gradient

Density gradient centrifugation

Sponsors

Maltepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Infertile men with astheno-teratozoospermia * Women were aged from 18 to 39 * Women had at least two mature oocytes.

Exclusion criteria

* MI oocytes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Semen parameters after sperm preparation with either method: semen volumeup to 7 monthssemen volume (ml)
Semen parameters after sperm preparation with either method: sperm concentrationup to 7 monthssperm concentration (106/ml)
Semen parameters after sperm preparation with either method: total motilityup to 7 monthstotal motility (%)
Semen parameters after sperm preparation with either method: progressive motilityup to 7 monthsprogressive motility (%)
Embryo development after sperm preparation with either methodup to 7 monthsEmbryo development and blastocyst formation were evaluated on days 1, 3 and 5 based on the criteria reported by Veeck and Zaninovic, 2003

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026