Skip to content

Dorsal Finger Reconstruction

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Difference Between Reversed Cross Finger Flap Versus Reversed Island Homo-digital Flap in Distal Dorsal Finger Defect Reconstruction

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04961879
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-07-14
Start date
2021-07-14
Completion date
2022-03-31
Last updated
2022-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Finger Injuries

Brief summary

objective of this study is To compare reversed cross finger flap with reversed island homo-digital flap in distal dorsal finger defect reconstruction regarding reliability & functional and aesthetic outcomes . comparative study that will be conducted at Plastic surgery department, Sohag university hospital on 30 patients .The population of the study will be patients with distal dorsal digital defects. We will divide the cases into two equal groups: the first are operated with reversed cross-finger flap and the second are operated with reversed island homo-digital flap.

Interventions

PROCEDUREReversed Cross Finger Flap

distal dorsal finger defect will be reconstructed by reversed cross finger flap \- reversed cross finger flap is a modified cross finger flap harvested from an adjacent finger .

PROCEDUREreversed island homo-digital flap

distal dorsal finger defect will be reconstructed by reversed island homo-digital flap \- this flap is harvested from the same finger .

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with dorsal digital defect distal to distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) joint * defect size ranged from 1 to 2 cm in width and 1-3 cm in length

Exclusion criteria

* chronic heavy smokers, * traumatic injury to the donor site and perforator .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
difference in range of motion between group 1 and group 2difference in range of motion between group 1 and group 2 will be measured at 4 months postoperativedifference in range of motion between group 1 and group 2 will be measured by manual goniometer in degrees

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026