Skip to content

The Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Gait Training as an Adjunct to Traditional Physiotherapy in Cerebral Palsy

The Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Gait Training as an Adjunct to Traditional Physiotherapy in Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04960683
Acronym
RAGT
Enrollment
41
Registered
2021-07-14
Start date
2020-11-08
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

Children, Lokomat

Brief summary

Need for study There are a few studies published on this topic from various parts of the globe and the results are mixed. Hence further research is required in this area and none of the studies have included samples from the Middle East. Some studies done in this area focus on biomechanical aspects of gait (Cherni, 2018) and our study mainly focuses on functional aspects of gait and quality of life. Studies done on this area focus highly on gait components and very little is available on the literature on improving balance. Since balance and stability are crucial for walking, it was decided to exclusively assess balance. Due to a wide range of therapeutic benefits, it is paramount to evaluate the effectiveness of different therapies provided to improve gait. Aim of the study: The aim of the proposed research is to investigate the effectiveness of robotic assisted gait training using Lokomat device as an adjunct in improving gait, balance and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy.

Detailed description

Background: Gait and balance have been a major issue faced by cerebral palsy children. Cerebral Palsy is the most common condition affecting around 2-2.5 children of 1000 live births (1 in every 400 children) over the last 20 years in the Western world (Levit, 2019). Cerebral Palsy causes complex issues related to physical, psychological and social functions. Active participation and the highest level of independence during daily living are primary goals for cerebral palsy children (Aurich, 2015). One of the major problems that limits activities of daily living is relate to gait and balance in cerebral palsy. From the past one-decade, the popularity of robotic assisted gait training devices have been increasing. There are a studies published on this topic from various parts of the globe and the results are mixed. Recent publications have demonstrated robotic assisted gait training benefits people with cerebral palsy, specifically in increasing walking speed and endurance (Carvalho, 2017). However, the efficacy of robotic assisted gait training in improving gait and balance is not well researched. This study will be the first one in the United Arab Emirates studying the local population and mainly focusing on functional aspects of gait, balance and quality of life. Aims: The main aim is to investigate the effectiveness of robotic -assisted gait training as an adjunct to traditional physiotherapy to improve gait, balance and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. Research hypothesis: Robotic -assisted gait training applied as adjunct to traditional therapy could improve balance, walking and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. Methodology: The participants attending the outpatient clinic at Zayed Higher Organization for People of Determination, Abu Dhabi will be invited to take part in the study. They will be randomly allocated to two groups. This study proposes to have 50 participants with at least 25 in each group. The participants will all have spastic form of cerebral palsy as possible with the age of 4-18 years. All the participants will have to have be at Gross Motor Function Classification Level (GMFCS) level I- IV. The robotic -assisted gait training include 5 sessions per week, of 40 min long session during one-month period. The conventional physiotherapy includes 5 sessions per week of 40 min long session during one-month period. The primary analysis will be the pre to post-test differences of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88),dimension D & E, 10 meters walk test, 6 minute walk test, Pediatric Balance Scale, Cerebral palsy Quality of Life questionnaire between experimental and control group. Data analysis: Data will be statistically analysed using one-way anova. Descriptive statistics and graphic displays will be present for all outcomes for interventions comparing robotic -assisted gait training with traditional physiotherapy training.

Interventions

Control group will receive the routine conventional physiotherapy treatment and the treatment for this group consists of the following: Conventional therapy protocol: * 5 sessions of 45 minutes a week, each session includes: * 5 minutes of stretching exercise * 20 minutes of strengthening exercise * 10 minutes of balance exercise * 10 minutes of gait training Experimental group will receive 45 min of Lokomat in addition to the conventional approach (as explained above). Since Lokomat appointments can be only 8 per day, it is planned to have two groups of 8 participants for 4 weeks each. The Lokomat training include the following: * 5 sessions of 45 minutes of conventional therapy (same as above) per week * 5 sessions of 45 minutes on Lokomat per week

Sponsors

Fatima College of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Cerebral palsy with spastic and mix form * Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS from level II to IV) * Age 4 to 18 * No contraindications for the training in the Lokomat * Able to follow simple instructions

Exclusion criteria

* On botox injection within the last 6 months (as the effect of botox wear out in 6 months) * Surgery within the last one year * Fixed contractures and/or with bone instability * Baclofen infusion pumps in situ * Seizure disorder that is not controlled by medication (if on medication, must not have had a seizure in the last 12 months); * Open skin lesions or vascular disorder of lower extremities; * Having participated in another Lokomat training regime within the previous 3months as well as a change in concomitant treatment within the last 4 weeks before or during the study period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life questionnaire for child (CP QOL-child) and Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life questionnaire for adolescent (CP QOL- teen)Baseline time 0 and up to 8 weeksThis Arabic validated CP QOL- child for age 4-12 and CP QOL- teen for age 13-18 questionnaires are used in the parent version. Its assesses 7 domains on a 9 level point Likert scale.
6 minute Walk testBaseline time 0 and up to 8 weeksThe test has been selected as a measure of gait endurance. This is validated test requiring individuals to walk 6 minutes on flat hard floor. Scoring is walking distance.
10 meters Walk testBaseline time 0 and up to 8 weeksThe test has been selected as a measure of gait speed. This is validated test requiring individuals to walk on flat hard floor at their comfortable speed for 10 meters.
Pediatric Balance ScaleBaseline time 0 and up to 8 weeks14 items valid scale is used to assess functional balance skills in children with spastic cerebral palsy.
Gross Motor Function Measure ( GMFM- 88) - dimension D & dimension EBaseline time 0 and up to 8 weeksThis is the validated test designed to measure change in gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy. Dimension D consist of 13 items for standing ability and dimension E has 24 items to assess walking, jumping and running in cerebral palsy children. Its a four point scoring system. Specific descriptors for each score is given in the Manual of GMFM-88.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Oxford scaleBaseline time 0 and up to 8 weeksThe most commonly used scale for testing muscle strength.
Modified Ashworth ScaleBaseline time 0 and up to 8 weeksIt is a muscle tone assessment.
Range of motionBaseline time 0 and up to 8 weeksMeasuring range of motion in hip, knee, ankle joint using the reliable tool called goniometer.

Countries

United Arab Emirates

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026