Skip to content

Understanding Visual Confusion Using Stereoscopic Displays

Monocular Visual Confusion for Field Expansion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04957745
Enrollment
13
Registered
2021-07-12
Start date
2021-11-09
Completion date
2022-07-27
Last updated
2023-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Binocular; Fusion, With Defective Stereopsis, Binocular Vision Suppression, Diplopia, Monocular Diplopia

Keywords

Visual confusion, Rivalry, Head mounted display, Stereoscopic displays, Binocular vision

Brief summary

In this research study we want to test how people understand a visual scene when the same image is presented to both the eyes, but portions of these images are altered in terms of contrast, depth or in some cases motion.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBinocular visual confusion (unilateral opaque)

The peripheral target was a horizontally drifting grating measuring 10° by 10°, with a spatial frequency of 1 cycle per degree and a temporal frequency of 3 Hz, and located at 10° above the fixation. For the binocular visual confusion condition, the non-transparent (opaque) peripheral target will be displayed on only one eye (unilateral opaque display).

BEHAVIORALUnilateral monocular visual confusion (unilateral see-through)

The peripheral target was a horizontally drifting grating measuring 10° by 10°, with a spatial frequency of 1 cycle per degree and a temporal frequency of 3 Hz, and located at 10° above the fixation. For the unilateral monocular visual confusion condition, the half-transparent peripheral target will be displayed on only one eye (unilateral see-through display).

BEHAVIORALBilateral monocular visual confusion (bilateral see-through)

The peripheral target was a horizontally drifting grating measuring 10° by 10°, with a spatial frequency of 1 cycle per degree and a temporal frequency of 3 Hz, and located at 10° above the fixation. For bilateral monocular visual confusion condition, the half-transparent peripheral target will be displayed on both eyes (bilateral see-through display).

Sponsors

National Eye Institute (NEI)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All participants in the group will see all three interventions (peripheral targets in three visual confusion conditions) in a randomized order. In this study design, each participant will serve as their own control, and the order of the interventions will be randomized to account for potential carryover or ordering effects. There will be no comparison or control group. The outcome will be compared through a within-subject analysis.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Better than 20/40 visual acuity in the worse eye * No restrictions of the peripheral visual field: (at least 60 degrees vertically and 40 degrees horizontally) * At least 14 years of age (no upper age limit) * Able to give voluntary, informed consent * Able to understand English * Binocular vision parameters within normal limits (Stereopsis ≤ 100 arc sec on any stereo test)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any physical or mental disabilities, including cognitive dysfunction, balance problems, or other deficits that could impair their ability to respond to the stimuli presented in this study will be excluded * Being unable to complete sessions lasting 2-3 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Total Viewing Time That Peripheral Target is PerceivedApproximately 1-2 sessions to finish total 6 trials, up to 2 hours for each session, any time within the 4month study period(Total time the peripheral target in the visual confusion condition was visible) / (total viewing time (=1 min))

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

13 participants were recruited and screened for eligibility and all of them met the inclusion criteria.

Pre-assignment details

13 participants were recruited and screened for eligibility and all of them met the inclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Visual Confusion
The study participants will respond to various visual confusion stimuli presented on a stereoscopic display designed to simulate binocular/monocular visual confusions Visual confusion: We will show peripheral target images on a background motion in a stereoscopic display. For the binocular visual confusion condition, the target peripheral image will be displayed on only one eye. For unilateral and bilateral monocular visual confusion conditions, the half-transparent peripheral image will be displayed on only one eye and both eyes, respectively.
13
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVisual Confusion
Age, Continuous30.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.25
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/Non-hispanic
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Non-hispanic
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
Stereo-acuity27.7 arcseconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.28
Visual acuity19.38 Snellen fraction (20/X)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.21

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Total Viewing Time That Peripheral Target is Perceived

(Total time the peripheral target in the visual confusion condition was visible) / (total viewing time (=1 min))

Time frame: Approximately 1-2 sessions to finish total 6 trials, up to 2 hours for each session, any time within the 4month study period

Population: Each subject observed two trials in each visual confusion condition. There were three visual confusion conditions, so each subject participated in 6 trials. Since 13 subjects participated, the total number of trials analyzed was 78 trials (6 \* 13). For each visual confusion condition, 26 trials were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Visual ConfusionPercentage of Total Viewing Time That Peripheral Target is PerceivedBinocular visual confusion (unilateral opaque target)73.56 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 17
Visual ConfusionPercentage of Total Viewing Time That Peripheral Target is PerceivedUnilateral monocular visual confusion (unilateral see-through target)59.64 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 25.42
Visual ConfusionPercentage of Total Viewing Time That Peripheral Target is PerceivedBilateral monocular visual confusion (bilateral see-through target)87.81 Percentage of TimeStandard Deviation 13.85
Comparison: Effect of visual confusion conditions (binocular, unilateral monocular, and bilateral monocular visual confusions) on Percentage of Total Viewing Time Peripheral Target is Perceived is analyzed by repeated measure (within-subject) ANOVA. The test was performed with a significance level of 0.05.p-value: <0.01ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026