Skip to content

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Avulsion Fracture of the AT and Conventional ATR--a Retrospective Study

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Avulsion Fracture of the Achilles Tendon and Conventional Achilles Tendon Rupture--a Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04957069
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-07-12
Start date
2013-01-01
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2021-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achilles Tendon Rupture, Avulsion Fracture of the Achilles Tendon

Brief summary

To compare the surgical outcomes between avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon and conventional Achilles tendon rupture, collected and analysed information of patients preoperatively and postoperatively.

Detailed description

Include 30 patients with avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon and 30 patients with Achilles tendon rupture underwent surgical treatment in our institute. Collect and evaluate MRI, VAS, AOFAS, and FFI score preoperatively and postoperatively. Finally explore the surgical outcomes between avulsion fracture of the AT and conventional ATR.

Interventions

PROCEDUREfixation

double row fixation with 3-4 wire anchors

end-to-end repair

Sponsors

Peking University Third Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with avulsion fracture of the Achilles tendon or Achilles tendon rupture

Exclusion criteria

* neuromuscular related diseases * other injuries of ankle joint

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MOCARTone year after sugeryMOCART is a scoring system to evaluate the repair effect of cartilage injury.The minimum and maximum values of MOCART are 100 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VASpre-surgery, one year after sugeryThe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is designed to present to the respondent a rating scale with minimum constraints. Respondents mark the location on the 10-centimeter line corresponding to the amount of pain they experienced. This gives them the greatest freedom to choose their pain's exact intensity. It also gives the maximum opportunity for each respondent to express a personal response style. The minimum and maximum values of VAS are 10 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a worse outcome.
AOFASpre-surgery, one year after sugeryThe American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score combines subjective scores of pain and function provided by the patient with objective scores based on the surgeon's physical examination of the patient (to assess sagittal motion, hindfoot motion, ankle-hindfoot stability and alignment of the ankle-hindfoot). The scale includes nine items that can be divided into three subscales (pain, function and alignment). The minimum and maximum values of AOFAS are 100 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a better outcome.
FFIpre-surgery, one year after sugeryA Foot Function Index (FFI) was developed to measure the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales. Both total and sub-scale scores are produced. The FFI was examined for test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct and criterion validity. Each scale is from 0 (no pain or difficulty) to 10 (worst pain imaginable or so difficult it required help) .

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026