Skip to content

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Smart Orthopedic Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems for Spinal Surgery

A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind, Parallel-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Smart Orthopedic Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems for Spinal Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04956588
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-07-09
Start date
2017-09-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2021-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Fractures, Spine Disease

Keywords

smart orthopedics, minimally invasive surgical systems, spinal surgery

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the intelligent orthopedic minimally invasive surgery system developed by Shenzhen Xinjunte Intelligent Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. in spinal surgery.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTsurgical robot

The surgical robot completed the screw placement according to the surgical plan, and the researchers closely monitored the screw placement process.

COMBINATION_PRODUCTcontrolled approach

The screw placement was performed using a controlled approach according to the surgical plan.

Sponsors

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University Third Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcomes assessor was blinded when evaluating the subject's imaging data (i.e., when calculating the deviation of the nail placement).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Age 18-65, gender unlimited; In line with the surgical conditions for spinal surgery requiring Kirschner wire implantation, and the treatment plan allows open or minimally invasive surgery; Signed the informed consent and agreed to participate in the study; Complete the filter check and meet all the entry criteria in the filter table.

Exclusion criteria

\- Subject meeting the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incorrect placement of guide pinDuring operationAfter the subject completes the preparation for guide needle placement (e.g. reduction), a C-arm scan is performed. Get the image. Surgical planning is performed on images. Control robot positioning. The doctor completes the insertion of the guide needle. Then the C-arm scan image was obtained again. Fusion of two groups of images on a third-party software. The deviation distance between the entry and exit points of the guide needle and the surgical plan was measured. The accuracy of guide needle placement was evaluated by the deviation of guide needle placement.
Number of X-ray exposuresDuring operationThe number of exposures was defined as the number of times the investigator used the X-ray during the operative period and also included the number of exposures performed to determine the surgical site.
X-ray exposure timeDuring operationX-ray exposure time refers to the total time of using X-rays from the planning of the operation to the end of the operation.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026