Skip to content

Effects of a Classic High-frequency rTMS Treatment Versus a Deep rTMS Treatment

Open-label Randomized Comparative Study of the Effects of a Classic High-frequency rTMS Treatment Versus a Deep rTMS Treatment in the Management of Resistant Depression

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04956016
Acronym
HAUVERDEEP
Enrollment
152
Registered
2021-07-09
Start date
2021-08-23
Completion date
2028-08-31
Last updated
2026-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

Brief summary

The main objective is to demonstrate that dTMS is more efficient than high frequency rTMS with a conventional coil. The patient will receive treatment arm A or B : Arm A : classic rTMS treatment (use of the 8-shaped coil) and standard therapy Arm B: treatment with deep rTMS (use of the H-shaped coil (helmet)) and standard therapies. 20 rTMS sessions are planned (5 sessions per week) and 3 follow-up visits : at Day 30, Day 60 and Day 90.

Interventions

DEVICEclassic rTMS using the 8-shaped coil

20 rTMS sessions are planned (5 sessions per week)

DEVICEdeep rTMS using the H1-shaped coil

20 rTMS sessions are planned (5 sessions per week)

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Volunteer subjects over 18 years old * Having signed a free and informed consent * Having a diagnostic of caracterised depressive episod recurrent or isolated according to DSM IV criteria (A.P.A 1994). * Having an antidepressant treatment not modified since 3 weeks * Score to MADRS scale ≥ 21 * Subject affiliated to a social security regimen

Exclusion criteria

* Depression with psychotic caracteristics * Co-morbid diagnosis according to axis I (DSM IV) of schizophrenia, dependence (or abuse) on alcohol and / or another substance (lifetime) * Patient who has already undergone seismotherapy for current episode and non-responder to this treatment * Patient hospitalized under duress or under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship) * Patient with a high risk of suicide (item 10 of MADRS \> 4) in the absence of hospitalization. * Contra-indication for IRM exam or rTMS : personnal history of comitial crisis, of neurological or neurochirurgical pathologies, metallic prosthetic material or foreign body (pacemaker, intraoculare ferromagnetic material, implanted cardiac defibrillator, cochlear implant, metal clip * Pregnancy * Simultaneous participation to another interventionnal study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A 50% change of MADRS scoreDay 60The main objective is to demonstrate that dTMS is more efficient than high frequency rTMS with a conventional coil. Modification of the MADRS score compared to baseline score. MADRS stands for Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. It is used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. A score from 0 to 6 being normal/symptom absent and a score \>34 being severe depression.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactGhina HARIKA-GERMANEAU, Dr
ghina.harika-germaneau@ch-poitiers.fr0033 5 16 52 61 18

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026