Skip to content

Deep Learning of Anterior Talofibular Ligament: Comparison of Different Models

Deep Learning of Anterior Talofibular Ligament: Comparison of Different Models

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04955067
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2021-07-08
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2022-03-30
Last updated
2021-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Ligament, Ankle

Keywords

artificial intelligence, anterior talofibular ligament, sports Injury

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to study the injury of the anterior talofibular ligament by deep learning method and compare a variety of different deep learning models to establish a deep learning method that can accurately identify and grade the injury of anterior talofibular ligament, and obtain a model with better recognition and grading effect.

Detailed description

1. Recognition and segmentation of anterior talofibular ligament based on DenseNet. Densenet was used to recognize the axial T2-fs image, and the image level was the most typical one. The labelimg program based on Python was used to locate the coordinates of the anterior talofibular ligament and then imported into Python for learning. All the data were divided into a training set (70%, and then 30% of the training set was selected as the verification set). The remaining 30% was used as the test set to evaluate the accuracy of model recognition. After identifying the anterior talofibular ligament, the local clipping and amplification are carried out to remove the redundant information. Finally, input the result to the next step. 2. Establishment and comparison of various deep learning models: four deep learning models were established and compared in this study, namely VGG19, AlexNet, CapsNet, and GoogleNet. The models using image fitting alone and those combining with clinical physical examination data were compared for each deep learning model. The diagnostic efficiency between models was expressed by the ROC curve, including AUC, F1 score, etc. the ROC curve was further analyzed by t-test, Delong test, and other statistical methods. In this study, the data were divided into a training set (70%, 30% in the training set as the validation set), and the remaining 30% as the test set to evaluate the classification accuracy.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTDiagnositic test

The results of hip arthroscopy were taken as the gold standard, and MRI examination was taken as the research object

Sponsors

Peking University Third Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Without any treatment before imaging examination; 2. MR of ankle joint was performed within 3 months before operation and the image quality was good; 3. Arthroscopic operation was performed in our hospital and the operation records were complete.

Exclusion criteria

1. history of ankle surgery, history of cancer or previous fractures. 2. Unclear image, serious artifact or incomplete clinical data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deep Learning of Anterior Talofibular Ligament: Comparison of Different Models2021.1-2022.3.1The model of deep learning was obtained for diagnosis and grading of anterior fibular ligament and compared with the doctors of different grades.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contacthuishu Yuan, MD
huishuy@bjmu.edu.cn15810245738
Backup ContactMing Ni, MD
sdyingxiang2017@163.com13884794867

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026