Skip to content

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Different Stepping-down Therapy for Childhood Asthma

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Different Stepping-down Therapy for Childhood Asthma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04953741
Enrollment
90
Registered
2021-07-08
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2022-08-01
Last updated
2021-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma in Children

Brief summary

This study is a 24-week, randomized, parallel group comparative effectiveness study to evaluate the risk of stepping down therapy for patients with well-controlled asthma treated with combination Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and Leukotriene receptor antagonist(LTRA).

Detailed description

Asthma guidelines recommend stepping down therapy once asthma is controlled for at least 3 months. Leukotriene receptor antagonist(LTRA). For children with mild persistent asthma, ICS twice a day combined with LTRA can be used for treatment, but there is no consensus on how to reduce drugs in patients with asthma that is well controlled (reducing the dose of ICS or stopping montelukast). We propose a 24-week, randomized, parallel group comparative effectiveness study comparing three approaches in patients with asthma well-controlled for at least three months on combination ICS and LTRA: Halve the dose of ICS firstly and then stop ICS with montelukast only, stop montelukast firstly and then halve the dose of ICS, and halve the dose of ICS firstly and then stop montelukast. Our goal is to compare the rate of treatment failure and determine the optimal treatment strategy. Additional goals include assessing risk factors for step-down failure.

Interventions

DRUGFluticasone propionate inhaled aerosol

The study consists of two stages and include three groups. Three groups include: Reduced dose Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug once a day and continuation of montelukast once a day,and then stopped Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol and continuation of montelukast once a day; Reduced dose Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug once a day and continuation of montelukast once a day,and then stopped montelukast and continuation of Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug once a day; Stopped montelukast and continuation of Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug twice daily, and then Reduced dose Fluticasone propionate Inhaled Aerosol 125 ug once a day. The scheme of every group is divided into two stages. Only those whose asthma are well controlled at the end of the first phase will be allowed to proceed to the next phase.

Sponsors

Xijing Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age 4-14 years * patients had mild to moderate persistent asthma. Patients have treated with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (equivalent to Fluticasone propionate inhaled aerosol 250 ug/ day) combined with Leukotriene receptor antagonist (Montelulast) at least 6 months of and had no symptoms of asthma for nearly 3 months under well asthma control(Asthma Control Test (ACT) score more than or equal to 20). * patients did not suffer from other acute or chronic diseases that may affect their growth and development

Exclusion criteria

* patients with severe persistent asthma or mild persistent asthma failed to be well controlled by low-dose ICS after starting treatment * suffer from other diseases: Congenital heart disease, chronic infectious disease, protracted diarrhea, congenital airway disease, congenital vascular ring malformation, congenital immune deficiency, tracheal foreign body, bronchial lymph node tuberculosis and gastroesophageal reflux etc. * patients with poor compliance stop medication or fail to take medication on time.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Asthma Control Test (ACT) scoreBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks and 24 weeksChange in participant's Asthma Control Test (ACT) score
Number of Participants Who Experienced asthma exacerbation or used oral/intravenous corticosteroids as neededBaseline (Week 0) to Week 12Participants Experienced asthma exacerbation or used oral/intravenous corticosteroids as needed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Forced vital capacity in predicted(FVC%pred)Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeksChange in participant's Forced vital capacity in predicted
Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide, FeNOBaseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeksChange in participant's Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide
Peak expiratory flow (PEF)Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeksChange in participant's Peak expiratory flow
Maximal mid expiratory flow in predicted(MMEF%pred)Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeksChange in participant's Maximal mid expiratory flow in predicted
Forced expiratory volume in one second in predicted(FEV1%pred)Baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeksChange in participant's Forced expiratory volume in one second in predicted

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXin Sun, doctor
sunxin6@fmmu.edu.cn+8613572536262

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026