Skip to content

Pilates Method on Functional Capacity and Blood Pressure of Elderly Women With Type 2 Diabetes

Effect of Short Period of Detraining of the Pilates Method on Functional Capacity and Blood Pressure of Elderly Women With Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04952948
Enrollment
22
Registered
2021-07-07
Start date
2016-08-23
Completion date
2016-12-19
Last updated
2021-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type-2 Diabetes, Physical Disability, Blood Pressure

Keywords

Resistance exercise, Functionality, Interruption, Diabetes, Cardiovascular

Brief summary

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a chronic inflammatory disease that is associated with loss of functional capacity and increased blood pressure. Coupled with this, there is an increased risk of falls and fractures in patients with T2D. On the other hand, conventional training programs for resistance, aerobic or combined exercises are strongly recommended for people with T2D, as they promote a reduction in the glycemic rate and blood pressure, and an improvement in functional capacity. However, little is known about unconventional training programs such as PILATES (dynamic and isometric muscle actions) on functional capacity and cardiovascular adaptations in T2D.

Detailed description

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a chronic inflammatory disease whose main mechanism of installation is insulin resistance and is associated with loss of functional capacity with consequent fragility and increased blood pressure. Currently, women have the highest prevalence of T2D in Brazil. Previous studies have shown that women are more affected by cases of hospitalization and that they have a higher risk of mortality due to illness. Muscle function and strength in patients with T2D show a reduction compared to healthy and normoglycemic subjects, especially in menopausal women, when estrogen declines with a consequent increase in body fat and decreased muscle quality. Coupled with this, there is a reduction in muscle mass and an increased risk of falls and fractures in patients with T2D. Its association with other factors such as physical inactivity, involuntary weight loss, less muscle strength and slower gait can lead to frailty and limit the performance of basic daily activities. On the other hand, conventional training programs for resistance, aerobic or combined exercises are strongly recommended for people with T2D, as they promote a reduction in the glycemic rate and blood pressure, and an improvement in functional capacity. Unconventional training programs such as PILATES (dynamic and isometric muscle actions) ensure the control of forces that act on the musculoskeletal system, promoting an important improvement in functional capacity and possible cardiovascular adaptations. Additionally, elderly people have pronounced losses of neuromuscular adaptations even in a short period of detraining, compromising gains related to functional capacity and this loss can be even more pronounced in patients with T2D. Therefore, it is also necessary for training professionals to understand the effects of the short detraining period after unconventional exercise programs like PILATES on the functional capacity of elderly women with T2D as well as to understand the effects of the PILATES training on blood pressure or cardiovascular adaptations.

Interventions

During the PILATES sessions, the practitioner received orientations to to perform slow movements, aware, and combined with the respiratory cycle. The exercises program was performed on a soft ground covered with tatamis. During the program, a set of swiss balls of 45, 55, and 65 cm in size and elastic bands of very moderate resistance were used. Each exercise session was divided into 3 stages, namely (a) global initial static and dynamic stretching (10 minutes); (b) general conditioning (45 minutes) and; (c) relaxation (5 minutes). The amount of series and repetitions per set in exercises, in addition to the intensity required in each session in PILATES is presented in Table 2 of Melo et al. (2020) - Vide reference.

Sponsors

Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Present a diagnosis of type-2 diabetes; * Do not have severe or decompensated heart disease; * Do not have coronary artery disease; * Do not have peripheral neuropathy and ulcers in the extremities; * Do not have severe skin lesions; * Do not have proliferative retinopathy; * Do not have insulin therapy; * Do not have any health condition that would hinder participation in the exercise sessions.

Exclusion criteria

* Present some unexpected abnormality in health conditions during the research; * Do not participate in more than 80% of the training sessions in the PILATES group.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in functional capacity in type-2 diabetesPre-intervention (week zero) versus 4 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL groupMeasurements of functional capacity (time in seconds of execution of the functional tests) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and post-intervention moments.
Change in blood pressure in type-2 diabetesPre-intervention (week zero) versus 4 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL groupMeasurements of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and post-intervention moments.
Change in lood pressure in type-2 diabetesPre-intervention (week zero) versus 8 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL groupMeasurements of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and post-intervention moments.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026