Skip to content

Amyloid Prediction in Early Stage Alzheimer's Disease Through Speech Phenotyping - FUTURE Extension

A Study to Evaluate the Ability of Speech- and Language-based Digital Biomarkers to Detect and Characterise Prodromal and Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease in a Clinical Setting - AMYPRED-US FUTURE Extension Study.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04951284
Acronym
FUTURE-US
Enrollment
42
Registered
2021-07-06
Start date
2021-01-21
Completion date
2024-05-28
Last updated
2024-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes), Mild Cognitive Impairment, Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease, Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease, Preclinical Alzheimer's disease, Prodromal Alzheimer's disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Normal Cognition, Amyloid, Speech, Acoustic, Language, Linguistic, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether a set of algorithms analysing acoustic and linguistic patterns of speech, can predict change in Preclinical Alzheimer's Clinical Composite with semantic processing (PACC5) between baseline and +12 month follow up across all four Arms, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA) between the change in PACC5 and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data to predict it. Secondary objectives include (1) evaluating whether similar algorithms can predict change in PACC5 between baseline and +12 month follow up in the cognitively normal (CN) and MCI populations separately; (2) evaluating whether similar algorithms trained to regress against PACC5 scores at baseline, still regress significantly against PACC5 scores at +12 month follow-up, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA) between the PACC5 composite at +12 months and the regression model, trained on baseline speech data to predict PACC5 scores at baseline; (3) evaluating whether similar algorithms can classify converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal Arms (Arm 3 + 4), and fast vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arm 1 + 2), as measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity and Cohen's kappa of the corresponding binary classifiers. Secondary objectives include the objectives above, but using time points of +24 months and +36 months; and finally to evaluate whether the model performance for the objectives and outcomes above improved if the model has access to speech data at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 month timepoints.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Novoic Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects are fully eligible for and have completed the AMYPRED-US (Amyloid Prediction in early stage Alzheimer's disease from acoustic and linguistic patterns of speech) study. (See https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04928976) \- Subject consents to take part in FUTURE extension study.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject hasn't completed the full visit day in the AMYPRED-US study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +12 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +36 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).36 months
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +12 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, to predict it in the CN Arms (Arms 3 and 4), as measured by the CIA.12 months
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +24 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, to predict it in the CN Arms (Arms 3 and 4), as measured by the CIA.24 months
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +36 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting it in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2), as measured by the CIA.36 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite at +12 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms based on +12 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).12 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite at +24 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms based on +12 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).24 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +36 months.36 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite at +36 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms based on +12 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).36 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data and +12 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).12 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data and +24 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).24 months
The agreement between the PACC5 composite and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data and +36 month speech data, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).36 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +12 months.12 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +24 months.24 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +12 months.12 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +24 months.24 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +36 months.36 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +12 months.12 months
The agreement between the change in the PACC5 composite between baseline and +24 months and the corresponding regression model, trained on baseline speech data, predicting in all four Arms, as measured by the coefficient of individual agreement (CIA).24 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +36 months.36 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +12 months.12 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +24 months.24 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +24 months.24 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +36 months.36 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +36 months.36 months
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +12 months.12 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +12 months.12 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +24 months.24 months
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +36 months.36 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +12 months.12 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +24 months.24 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +36 months.36 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +12 months.12 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +24 months.24 months
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between fast decliners vs slow decliners in the MCI Arms (Arms 1 and 2) at +36 months.36 months
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between converters vs non-converters in the cognitively normal (CN) Arms (Arms 3 and 4); converters defined as having a CDR Global score of 0.5 or more at +24 months.24 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026