Skip to content

Producing a Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy Program

Producing a Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy Program

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04951037
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-07-06
Start date
2021-09-15
Completion date
2022-09-02
Last updated
2024-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Keywords

Dementia caregiver

Brief summary

This is a pilot/feasibility study to develop and test a fully online, self-administered psychoeducation program to enhance the caregiving mastery of family and friends who provide unpaid care for persons living with Alzheimer's and similar dementia disorders (PLWD).

Detailed description

This study seeks to develop and test a fully online, self-administered psychoeducation program to enhance the caregiving mastery of family and friends who provide unpaid care for persons living with Alzheimer's and similar dementia disorders (PLWD). As the number of PLWD rises in the United States from the perhaps 7 million today to possibly 15 million in 2050, the healthcare system will rely on those caregivers even more. It is well established that family caregiving is taxing and stressful and that managing the day-to-day life of PLWD and handling the behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) that they may exhibit are the main sources of stress. Group-based psychoeducational programs such as the Savvy Caregiver program (SCP) have demonstrated that the acquisition of skills, knowledge, and caregiving mastery can ameliorate caregiving stress - and enhance PLWD quality of life. Many factors, however, preclude caregivers' attendance in group-based programs and limit programs' scalability. To address the issue of access, the researchers have developed the Tele-Savvy program, an online version of SCP that brings groups of caregivers together in facilitator-led synchronous groups and provides substantive educational augmentation through asynchronous e-mail-delivered video lessons. The first aim of this study is to develop a fully asynchronous online Savvy program that incorporates learning activities that promote both knowledge and skill acquisition and develop and enhance caregivers' felt-sense of caregiving mastery. Developing this education program will utilize input from clinicians, educators, Tele-Savvy facilitators, and caregiver advisors. The second study aim is to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the created online program. This study will recruit 60 family caregivers to take part in a no-control trial of the program. Data will be gathered at baseline, immediately upon course completion and at 3 months post-baseline to assess caregiver distress measures (depression, strain, burden, anxiety), caregiver competence/ mastery, and care recipient quality of life.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFully Asynchronous Online Savvy Program

The intervention is a fully online, self-administered psychoeducational program designed to enhance caregiver mastery for family and friends providing unpaid care for living with Alzheimer's and similar dementia disorders. Participants will be asked to engage with a fully online version of Tele-Savvy for 42 days. Participants will receive a series of daily video lessons related to caregiving. These lessons are generally 8-15 minutes in length and are emailed to participants. Participants can watch the lessons whenever and as often as they wish over the course of the study. There will also be self-guided learning strategies and exercises to accomplish skill and mastery related to the caregiving role. The lessons cover a variety of topics including: * Facts about dementing Illnesses * Caregiving Strategies - guiding the person through days that are as safe, calm, and pleasant as possible * Self-Care for the Caregiver

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* primary unpaid caregiver for a community-dwelling PLWD * provide at least 10 hours of direct care per week * able to read and understand English * be able to access the course online * naïve to Savvy or Tele-Savvy

Exclusion criteria

* cannot provide consent * prisoners * cognitively impaired adult * not able to clearly understand English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) ScoreBaseline, Month 2, Month 3The CES-D is a 20-item self-report instrument asking respondents if they have experienced symptoms of depression during the past week. Responses are given on a scale of 0 to 3 where rarely = 0 and most of the time = 3. Total scores range from 0 to 60 and higher scores indicate greater symptoms of depression.
Zarit Burden Interview ScoreBaseline, Month 2, Month 3The Zarit Burden Interview is a 22-item scale of objective and subjective caregiver burden. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = never and 4 = nearly always. Total scores range from 0 to 88 where higher scores indicate greater feelings of being burdened with providing care.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) ScoreBaseline, Month 2, Month 3The STAI is a 20-item self-report scale of positive and negative anxiety experiences. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much so. Total scores range from 20 to 80 and higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Caregiver Mastery Scale - Caregiving Competence ScoreBaseline, Month 2, Month 3The Caregiving Mastery instrument assesses caregiver mastery of 3 different realms of caregiving situations: Relational Deprivation, Caregiving Competence, and Management of Situation. The Caregiving Competence subscale asks caregivers about their thoughts about the caregiving they provide with 4 items where responses are given on a 4-point scale where not at all = 1 and completely or very = 4. Total scores range from 4 to 16 where higher scores indicate greater feelings of competence with caregiving.
Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Frequency ScoreBaseline, Month 2, Month 3The RMBPC is a 24-item scale reporting on frequency of disturbing care recipient behaviors and severity or caregiver reactions to these behaviors. Respondents indicate how frequently problems have occurred on a 5-point scale where 0 = never occurred and 4 = daily or more often. Total frequency scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating greater frequency of memory and behavior problems exhibited by the PLWD.
Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreBaseline, Month 2, Month 3The RMBPC is a 24-item scale reporting on frequency of disturbing care recipient behaviors and severity or caregiver reactions to these behaviors. Respondents indicate the degree to which problems have bothered or upset them on a 5-point scale where 0 = not at all and 4 = extremely. Total reaction scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating more bothered or upset by memory and behavior problems exhibited by the PLWD.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited in Atlanta, USA. Participant enrollment began September 15, 2021 and all follow-up assessments were completed by September 2, 2022.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy Program
Family caregivers of PLWD taking part in a fully asynchronous online caregiver education program. The intervention is a fully online, self-administered psychoeducational program designed to enhance caregiver mastery for family and friends providing unpaid care for living with Alzheimer's and similar dementia disorders. Participants are asked to engage with a fully online version of Tele-Savvy for 42 days.
60
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyCompleted study assessments but did not complete the intervention10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up16
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFully Asynchronous Online Savvy Program
Age, Continuous58.217 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.438
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
55 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
48 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
50 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
9 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Non-binary
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Caregiver Mastery Scale - Caregiving Competence Score

The Caregiving Mastery instrument assesses caregiver mastery of 3 different realms of caregiving situations: Relational Deprivation, Caregiving Competence, and Management of Situation. The Caregiving Competence subscale asks caregivers about their thoughts about the caregiving they provide with 4 items where responses are given on a 4-point scale where not at all = 1 and completely or very = 4. Total scores range from 4 to 16 where higher scores indicate greater feelings of competence with caregiving.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 3

Population: Participants with incomplete responses were removed from this analysis. Of the 29 participants who completed the study intervention and assessments, 4 had missing responses for this survey at any time point, resulting in 25 participants analyzed. Values are also included for all study participants responding to surveys at the indicated time points, even if they did not complete the intervention; of these 8 had missing responses on this survey at Baseline and 1 had missing responses at Month 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCaregiver Mastery Scale - Caregiving Competence ScoreBaseline among those who completed the Online Savvy Program12.160 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCaregiver Mastery Scale - Caregiving Competence ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program12.821 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.945
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCaregiver Mastery Scale - Caregiving Competence ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program13.143 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.085
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCaregiver Mastery Scale - Caregiving Competence ScoreBaseline among those who completed the survey11.481 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCaregiver Mastery Scale - Caregiving Competence ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the survey12.689 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.998
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCaregiver Mastery Scale - Caregiving Competence ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the survey13.026 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.146
Primary

Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) Score

The CES-D is a 20-item self-report instrument asking respondents if they have experienced symptoms of depression during the past week. Responses are given on a scale of 0 to 3 where rarely = 0 and most of the time = 3. Total scores range from 0 to 60 and higher scores indicate greater symptoms of depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 3

Population: This analysis includes values for the subset of 29 participants who completed the study intervention and the study assessments. Some participants did not complete the study intervention according to study timelines, but they did remain in the study and complete the assessments. In order to report all available data, values are also included for all study participants who completed the survey at the indicated time points, regardless of whether they completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCenter for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) ScoreBaseline among those who completed the Online Savvy Program11.483 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.009
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCenter for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program9.345 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCenter for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program8.964 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.149
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCenter for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) ScoreBaseline among those who completed the survey14.317 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.058
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCenter for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the survey10.848 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramCenter for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the survey10.132 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.612
Primary

Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Frequency Score

The RMBPC is a 24-item scale reporting on frequency of disturbing care recipient behaviors and severity or caregiver reactions to these behaviors. Respondents indicate how frequently problems have occurred on a 5-point scale where 0 = never occurred and 4 = daily or more often. Total frequency scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating greater frequency of memory and behavior problems exhibited by the PLWD.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 3

Population: This analysis includes values for the subset of 29 participants who completed the study intervention and the study assessments. Some participants did not complete the study intervention according to study timelines, but they did remain in the study and complete the assessments. In order to report all available data, values are also included for all study participants who completed the survey at the indicated time points, regardless of whether they completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Frequency ScoreBaseline among those who completed the Online Savvy Program40.276 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.015
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Frequency ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program36.345 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.529
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Frequency ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program34.786 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.796
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Frequency ScoreBaseline among those who completed the survey40.407 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.849
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Frequency ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the survey35.739 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.784
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Frequency ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the survey34.897 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.784
Primary

Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction Score

The RMBPC is a 24-item scale reporting on frequency of disturbing care recipient behaviors and severity or caregiver reactions to these behaviors. Respondents indicate the degree to which problems have bothered or upset them on a 5-point scale where 0 = not at all and 4 = extremely. Total reaction scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating more bothered or upset by memory and behavior problems exhibited by the PLWD.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 3

Population: This analysis includes values for the subset of 29 participants who completed the study intervention and the study assessments. Some participants did not complete the study intervention according to study timelines, but they did remain in the study and complete the assessments. In order to report all available data, values are also included for all study participants who completed the survey at the indicated time points, regardless of whether they completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreBaseline among those who completed the Online Savvy Program18.483 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.534
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program12.828 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.016
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program12.893 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.42
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreBaseline among those who completed the survey20.167 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.238
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the survey12.522 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.453
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramRevised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Reaction ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the survey13.132 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.977
Primary

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Score

The STAI is a 20-item self-report scale of positive and negative anxiety experiences. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much so. Total scores range from 20 to 80 and higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 3

Population: This analysis includes values for the subset of 29 participants who completed the study intervention and the study assessments. Some participants did not complete the study intervention according to study timelines, but they did remain in the study and complete the assessments. In order to report all available data, values are also included for all study participants who completed the survey at the indicated time points, regardless of whether they completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) ScoreBaseline among those who completed the Online Savvy Program31.793 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.777
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program31.793 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.104
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program29.893 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.23
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) ScoreBaseline among those who completed the survey34.862 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.19
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the survey31.761 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.053
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the survey31.103 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.167
Primary

Zarit Burden Interview Score

The Zarit Burden Interview is a 22-item scale of objective and subjective caregiver burden. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = never and 4 = nearly always. Total scores range from 0 to 88 where higher scores indicate greater feelings of being burdened with providing care.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 2, Month 3

Population: This analysis includes values for the subset of 29 participants who completed the study intervention and the study assessments. Some participants did not complete the study intervention according to study timelines, but they did remain in the study and complete the assessments. In order to report all available data, values are also included for all study participants who completed the survey at the indicated time points, regardless of whether they completed the intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramZarit Burden Interview ScoreBaseline among those who completed the Online Savvy Program31.207 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.957
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramZarit Burden Interview ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program29.138 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.395
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramZarit Burden Interview ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the Online Savvy Program26.296 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.474
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramZarit Burden Interview ScoreBaseline among those who completed the survey35.050 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.274
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramZarit Burden Interview ScoreMonth 2 among those who completed the survey31.239 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.754
Fully Asynchronous Online Savvy ProgramZarit Burden Interview ScoreMonth 3 among those who completed the survey28.730 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.235

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026