Skip to content

Global Linerixibat Itch Study of Efficacy and Safety in Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) (GLISTEN)

A Two-part, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Linerixibat for the Treatment of Cholestatic Pruritus in Participants With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04950127
Enrollment
238
Registered
2021-07-06
Start date
2021-08-27
Completion date
2024-12-20
Last updated
2025-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pruritus

Keywords

Cholestasis, GLISTEN, GSK2330672, Itch, Primary biliary cholangitis, Pruritus

Brief summary

This is a 2-part study in PBC participants with cholestatic pruritus and will evaluate the efficacy, safety and impact on health-related quality of life of linerixibat compared with placebo.

Interventions

Participants will receive linerixibat.

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive placebo.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Participants and investigator will be blinded to the study treatment.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized to receive linerixibat and/or placebo during the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female participants must be between 18 to 80 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent. * Participants who have documented PBC. * Participants who have moderate to severe itch.

Exclusion criteria

* Total bilirubin \>2.0 times Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) using the average of two Baseline measures. * Screening Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) \> 6 times ULN in a single Baseline measure or ALT \> 5 times ULN using the average of two Baseline measures. * Screening estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 milliliter per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m\^2). * History or presence of hepatic decompensation (e.g., variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy or ascites). * Presence of HBsAg positive hepatitis B or hepatitis C (HCV) (anti-HCV and Ribonucleic acid \[RNA\] detected) infection, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), alcoholic liver disease and/or confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma or biliary cancer. * Current clinically significant diarrhea or active inflammatory ileal disease according to Investigator´s clinical judgment. * Current symptomatic cholelithiasis or cholecystitis. * Current diagnosis of primary skin disorders with itch as a characteristic feature (e.g., atopic dermatitis, psoriasis). * Primary sleep disorders such as but are not limited to sleep apnea, narcolepsy, hypersomnia. * Initiation, discontinuation or change in dose of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), bezafibrate or fenofibrate in the 8 weeks prior to Screening. * Use of obeticholic acid: within 8 weeks prior to Screening. (Participants may not initiate or restart during the study). * Initiation, discontinuation, or change in dose of any of the following in the 8 weeks prior to Screening: bile acid binding resins, rifampicin, naltrexone, naloxone, nalfurafine, pregabalin, gabapentin, sertraline or other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs), antihistamines used for the treatment of itching. * Administration of any other human ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitor in the 12 weeks prior to screening. * Any planned procedures intended to treat cholestatic pruritus such as nasobiliary drainage or ultraviolet light therapy from Screening and throughout the study. * History of sensitivity or intolerance to the study treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Itch Scores Over 24 Weeks Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)Baseline and up to Week 24Itch Scores were assessed using a NRS twice daily, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The worst daily itch score was defined as the worst of the two scores recorded daily. The weekly itch score was defined as the average of the worst daily itch scores in one week. The monthly itch score was defined as the worst weekly itch score for the month (4 weeks). Higher monthly itch scores indicate worse itching. Baseline is the worst weekly itch score in the 28 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as the post dose value minus baseline value. Least-squares (LS) means and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported by taking average of LS means of change from baseline in monthly itch scores obtained over 24 weeks using equal weighting for all time points. Analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Sleep Score Over 24 Weeks Using NRSBaseline up to Week 24Sleep Scores were assessed using an NRS scale, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no sleep interference and 10 is complete sleep interference. The weekly sleep scale is the average of the daily sleep scores for each week. The monthly sleep score was defined as the worst weekly sleep score for the month (4 weeks). Higher monthly sleep scores indicate higher impact on sleep. Baseline is the worst Weekly Sleep Score in the 28 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as the post dose value minus baseline value. LS means and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported by taking average of LS means of change from baseline in monthly sleep scores obtained over 24 weeks using equal weighting for all time points analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method. Mean Change from Baseline in Monthly Sleep Score over 24 weeks was the second endpoint tested in the hierarchical analysis.
Part A: Percentage of Responders Defined as Achieving More Than or Equal to (>=) 2-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24At Week 24Monthly Itch Score was assessed using an NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The Monthly Itch Score was determined from the worst weekly itch score for the month (4 weeks). Baseline is the worst weekly itch score in the 28 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Responders were defined as participants achieving \>=2-point reduction (improvement) from baseline in the Monthly Itch Score. Percentage of Responders achieving \>= 2-point Reduction from Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24 was the third endpoint tested in the hierarchical analysis.
Part A: Percentage of Responders Achieving >=3-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24At Week 24Monthly Itch Score was assessed using an NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The Monthly Itch Score was determined from the worst weekly itch score for the month (4 weeks). Baseline is the worst weekly itch score in the 28 days prior to randomization. Responders were defined as participants achieving \>=3-point reduction (improvement) from baseline in the Monthly Itch Score. Percentage of Responders achieving \>= 3-point Reduction from Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24 was the fourth endpoint to be tested in the hierarchical analysis.
Part A: Percentage of Responders as Achieving a >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24At Week 24Monthly Itch Score was assessed using an NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The Monthly Itch Score was determined from the worst weekly itch score for the month (4 weeks). Baseline is the worst weekly itch score in the 28 days prior to randomization. Responders were defined as participants achieving \>=4-point reduction (improvement) from baseline in the Monthly Itch Score. Percentage of Responders achieving \>= 4-point Reduction from Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24 was the fifth endpoint to be tested in the hierarchical analysis.
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Score at Week 2 Using NRSBaseline and at Week 2Itch Score was assessed using a twice daily NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The worst daily itch score was defined as the worst of the two scores recorded daily. The weekly itch score was defined as the average of the worst daily itch scores in one week. Higher weekly itch scores indicate worse itching. Baseline is the average of the Worst Daily Itch scores in the 7 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as the Week 2 value minus baseline value. Key secondary endpoints were tested in a step-down/hierarchical approach. Mean Change from Baseline in Weekly Itch Score at Week 2 was the first endpoint tested in the hierarchical analysis. LS mean and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Over 24 WeeksBaseline and up to Week 24The Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a patient-reported outcome measure used to assess the severity of symptoms from the participant's perspective. The PGI-S asks participant to rate the severity of their itch in the past 7 days on a single item, using a scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 5 (very severe). Higher score indicates higher severity. Baseline is the last assessment prior to the first dose of randomized treatment for Part A (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as the post dose value minus baseline value. LS means and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported by taking average of LS means of change from baseline in PGI-S obtained over 24 weeks using equal weighting for all time points, analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.
Part A: Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scores Over 24 WeeksWeek 4 up to Week 24Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) was assessed using a 7-level response scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher score indicates higher level of change. LS means and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported by taking average of LS means of PGI-C obtained over 24 weeks using equal weighting for all timepoints, analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) at Week 24Baseline and Week 24Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for evaluation of ALP. Change from Baseline in ALP at Week 24 was evaluated. Baseline was established using an average of two sets of laboratory values obtained at least 4 weeks apart within 56 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as Week 24 value minus Baseline value.
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin at Week 24Baseline and Week 24Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for evaluation of Bilirubin. Change from Baseline in total bilirubin at Week 24 was evaluated. Baseline was established using an average of two sets of laboratory values obtained at least 4 weeks apart within 56 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as Week 24 value minus Baseline value.
Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Baseline up to Week 24PBC-40 is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire validated for use in participants with PBC. It consists of 40 questions, which are grouped into 6 domains with 3 to 11 questions per domain. Each question is scored from 1 (least impact) to 5 (greatest impact). For all questions, an answer of Does/Did not apply was scored 0. All questions within a domain are summed to obtain individual domain score. Domains were: Symptoms (7 questions) with score range 6 to 35, Itch (3 questions) with score range 0 to 15, Fatigue (11 questions) with score range 11 to 55 , Cognitive (6 questions) with score range 6 to 30 , Emotional (3 questions) with score range 3 to 15 and Social (10 questions) with score range 8 to 50 . Higher scores for individual domains represent poorer quality of life. Baseline is the last assessment prior to the first dose of randomized treatment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as Week 24 value minus Baseline value.

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 238 participants from Europe, North America, Latin America and Asia were enrolled and randomized.

Pre-assignment details

This study was conducted in 2 parts: Part A and Part B. Participants were randomized in 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive either: linerixibat 40 milligram (mg) twice a day (BID) in Part A and Part B, linerixibat 40mg twice a day (BID) in Part A and placebo in Part B, placebo in Part A and Part B, or placebo in Part A and linerixibat 40mg twice a day (BID) in Part B.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)
Participants were randomized to receive linerixibat 40 mg tablet orally twice a day (BID) in Part A (up to Week 24).
119
Part A: Placebo
Participants were randomized to receive Placebo orally twice a day (BID) in Part A (up to Week 24).
119
Total238

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Part A (Day 1 to Week 24)Adverse Event420000
Part A (Day 1 to Week 24)Physician Decision320000
Part A (Day 1 to Week 24)Withdrawal by Subject970000
Part B (Week 24 to Week 32)Physician Decision000001
Part B (Week 24 to Week 32)Withdrawal by Subject000004

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: PlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
18-49 Years
42 Participants30 Participants72 Participants
Age, Customized
50-64 Years
52 Participants54 Participants106 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 Years
25 Participants35 Participants60 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
HISPANIC OR LATINO
33 Participants21 Participants54 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO
85 Participants95 Participants180 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
UNKNOWN
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
113 Participants113 Participants226 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1180 / 1190 / 530 / 520 / 460 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
54 / 11896 / 1195 / 5316 / 523 / 467 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 11814 / 1190 / 530 / 522 / 460 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Itch Scores Over 24 Weeks Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Itch Scores were assessed using a NRS twice daily, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The worst daily itch score was defined as the worst of the two scores recorded daily. The weekly itch score was defined as the average of the worst daily itch scores in one week. The monthly itch score was defined as the worst weekly itch score for the month (4 weeks). Higher monthly itch scores indicate worse itching. Baseline is the worst weekly itch score in the 28 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as the post dose value minus baseline value. Least-squares (LS) means and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported by taking average of LS means of change from baseline in monthly itch scores obtained over 24 weeks using equal weighting for all time points. Analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed on the Intent to Treat (ITT) set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Itch Scores Over 24 Weeks Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)-2.86 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Itch Scores Over 24 Weeks Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)-2.15 Scores on a scale
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline Monthly Itch score (MIS), Visit\*Baseline MIS interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1.15, -0.28]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for evaluation of ALP. Change from Baseline in ALP at Week 24 was evaluated. Baseline was established using an average of two sets of laboratory values obtained at least 4 weeks apart within 56 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as Week 24 value minus Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Only participants with data at baseline and at least one post-baseline time point were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) at Week 2410.61 International units per liter (IU/L)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) at Week 24-8.03 International units per liter (IU/L)
Secondary

Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin at Week 24

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for evaluation of Bilirubin. Change from Baseline in total bilirubin at Week 24 was evaluated. Baseline was established using an average of two sets of laboratory values obtained at least 4 weeks apart within 56 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as Week 24 value minus Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Only participants with data at baseline and at least one post-baseline time point were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin at Week 241.77 Micromoles per Liter (mmol/L)
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Bilirubin at Week 24-0.31 Micromoles per Liter (mmol/L)
Secondary

Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Sleep Score Over 24 Weeks Using NRS

Sleep Scores were assessed using an NRS scale, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no sleep interference and 10 is complete sleep interference. The weekly sleep scale is the average of the daily sleep scores for each week. The monthly sleep score was defined as the worst weekly sleep score for the month (4 weeks). Higher monthly sleep scores indicate higher impact on sleep. Baseline is the worst Weekly Sleep Score in the 28 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as the post dose value minus baseline value. LS means and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported by taking average of LS means of change from baseline in monthly sleep scores obtained over 24 weeks using equal weighting for all time points analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method. Mean Change from Baseline in Monthly Sleep Score over 24 weeks was the second endpoint tested in the hierarchical analysis.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Only participants with data at baseline and at least one post-baseline time point were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Sleep Score Over 24 Weeks Using NRS-2.77 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Monthly Sleep Score Over 24 Weeks Using NRS-2.24 Scores on a scale
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline Monthly sleep score (MSS), Visit\*Baseline MSS interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: 0.02495% CI: [-0.98, -0.07]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Over 24 Weeks

The Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a patient-reported outcome measure used to assess the severity of symptoms from the participant's perspective. The PGI-S asks participant to rate the severity of their itch in the past 7 days on a single item, using a scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 5 (very severe). Higher score indicates higher severity. Baseline is the last assessment prior to the first dose of randomized treatment for Part A (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as the post dose value minus baseline value. LS means and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported by taking average of LS means of change from baseline in PGI-S obtained over 24 weeks using equal weighting for all time points, analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.

Time frame: Baseline and up to Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Only participants with data at baseline and at least one post-baseline time point were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Over 24 Weeks-1.22 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Over 24 Weeks-0.84 Scores on a scale
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline PGI-S score, Visit\*Baseline PGI-S score interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.55, -0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24

PBC-40 is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire validated for use in participants with PBC. It consists of 40 questions, which are grouped into 6 domains with 3 to 11 questions per domain. Each question is scored from 1 (least impact) to 5 (greatest impact). For all questions, an answer of Does/Did not apply was scored 0. All questions within a domain are summed to obtain individual domain score. Domains were: Symptoms (7 questions) with score range 6 to 35, Itch (3 questions) with score range 0 to 15, Fatigue (11 questions) with score range 11 to 55 , Cognitive (6 questions) with score range 6 to 30 , Emotional (3 questions) with score range 3 to 15 and Social (10 questions) with score range 8 to 50 . Higher scores for individual domains represent poorer quality of life. Baseline is the last assessment prior to the first dose of randomized treatment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as Week 24 value minus Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: ITT population set included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Number of Participants Analyzed (N) was the maximum number of participants analyzed for any domain, while Number analyzed (n) was the number of participants included in the model for each domain.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Itch (score range: 0 to 15)-3.47 Scores on a scale
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Emotional (score range: 3 to 15)-1.07 Scores on a scale
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Social (score range: 8 to 50)-2.57 Scores on a scale
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Fatigue (score range: 11 to 55)-2.94 Scores on a scale
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Symptoms (score range: 6 to 35)0.54 Scores on a scale
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Cognitive (score range: 6 to 30)-0.71 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Symptoms (score range: 6 to 35)0.08 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Cognitive (score range: 6 to 30)-1.47 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Fatigue (score range: 11 to 55)-4.54 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Itch (score range: 0 to 15)-2.89 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Social (score range: 8 to 50)-2.42 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Domain Scores at Week 24Emotional (score range: 3 to 15)-1.34 Scores on a scale
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline PBC-40 domain scores, Visit\*Baseline PBC-40 domain scores interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: 0.17695% CI: [-0.34, 1.86]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline PBC-40 domain scores, Visit\*Baseline PBC-40 domain scores interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: 0.40395% CI: [-0.36, 0.89]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline PBC-40 domain scores, Visit\*Baseline PBC-40 domain scores interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: 0.13295% CI: [-0.48, 3.67]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline PBC-40 domain scores, Visit\*Baseline PBC-40 domain scores interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: 0.13295% CI: [-1.34, 0.18]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline PBC-40 domain scores, Visit\*Baseline PBC-40 domain scores interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: 0.83695% CI: [-1.57, 1.27]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline PBC-40 domain scores, Visit\*Baseline PBC-40 domain scores interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: 0.31895% CI: [-0.44, 1.34]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Score at Week 2 Using NRS

Itch Score was assessed using a twice daily NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The worst daily itch score was defined as the worst of the two scores recorded daily. The weekly itch score was defined as the average of the worst daily itch scores in one week. Higher weekly itch scores indicate worse itching. Baseline is the average of the Worst Daily Itch scores in the 7 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Change from Baseline is defined as the Week 2 value minus baseline value. Key secondary endpoints were tested in a step-down/hierarchical approach. Mean Change from Baseline in Weekly Itch Score at Week 2 was the first endpoint tested in the hierarchical analysis. LS mean and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.

Time frame: Baseline and at Week 2

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Only participants with data at baseline and at least one post-baseline time point were included

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Score at Week 2 Using NRS-1.78 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Score at Week 2 Using NRS-1.07 Scores on a scale
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Week, Week\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline Weekly Itch score (WIS), Visit\*Baseline WIS interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.07, -0.34]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Part A: Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scores Over 24 Weeks

Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) was assessed using a 7-level response scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Higher score indicates higher level of change. LS means and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals are reported by taking average of LS means of PGI-C obtained over 24 weeks using equal weighting for all timepoints, analyzed using Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) method.

Time frame: Week 4 up to Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Only participants with data for at least one time point were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scores Over 24 Weeks1.97 Scores on a scale
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Scores Over 24 Weeks2.46 Scores on a scale
Comparison: The mixed model repeated measures analysis includes Treatment Group, Visit, Visit\*Treatment Group interaction, Baseline Concomitant Itch Medication.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.76, -0.21]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Part A: Percentage of Responders Achieving >=3-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24

Monthly Itch Score was assessed using an NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The Monthly Itch Score was determined from the worst weekly itch score for the month (4 weeks). Baseline is the worst weekly itch score in the 28 days prior to randomization. Responders were defined as participants achieving \>=3-point reduction (improvement) from baseline in the Monthly Itch Score. Percentage of Responders achieving \>= 3-point Reduction from Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24 was the fourth endpoint to be tested in the hierarchical analysis.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Percentage values were rounded to the nearest whole number.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Percentage of Responders Achieving >=3-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 2456.0 Percentage of participants
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Responders Achieving >=3-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 2443.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) stratified analysis adjusted for baseline factors: Baseline Itch Severity (Moderate: \>=4 and \<7, Severe: \>=7); Concomitant cholestatic pruritus treatment regimen (Regimen contains BABR, Regimen does not contain BABR, No defined treatment). Multiple imputation of missing Monthly itch scores was done before deriving responder definitions. Imputed datasets were analyzed using the CMH method and combined.p-value: 0.04395% CI: [0, 27]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Part A: Percentage of Responders as Achieving a >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24

Monthly Itch Score was assessed using an NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The Monthly Itch Score was determined from the worst weekly itch score for the month (4 weeks). Baseline is the worst weekly itch score in the 28 days prior to randomization. Responders were defined as participants achieving \>=4-point reduction (improvement) from baseline in the Monthly Itch Score. Percentage of Responders achieving \>= 4-point Reduction from Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24 was the fifth endpoint to be tested in the hierarchical analysis.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Percentage values were rounded to the nearest whole number.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Percentage of Responders as Achieving a >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 2441.0 Percentage of participants
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Responders as Achieving a >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 2429.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) stratified analysis adjusted for baseline factors: Baseline Itch Severity (Moderate: \>=4 and \<7, Severe: \>=7); Concomitant cholestatic pruritus treatment regimen (Regimen contains BABR, Regimen does not contain BABR, No defined treatment). Multiple imputation of missing Monthly itch scores was done before deriving responder definitions. Imputed datasets were analyzed using the CMH method and combined.p-value: 0.05895% CI: [0, 24]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Part A: Percentage of Responders Defined as Achieving More Than or Equal to (>=) 2-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24

Monthly Itch Score was assessed using an NRS, ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no itching and 10 the worst imaginable itching. The Monthly Itch Score was determined from the worst weekly itch score for the month (4 weeks). Baseline is the worst weekly itch score in the 28 days prior to randomization (Day 1). Responders were defined as participants achieving \>=2-point reduction (improvement) from baseline in the Monthly Itch Score. Percentage of Responders achieving \>= 2-point Reduction from Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 24 was the third endpoint tested in the hierarchical analysis.

Time frame: At Week 24

Population: The analysis was performed on the ITT set that included all randomized participants. Participants in the ITT Population were classified according to the treatment as randomized. Percentage values were rounded to the nearest whole number.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A: Linerixibat 40 Milligrams (mg)Part A: Percentage of Responders Defined as Achieving More Than or Equal to (>=) 2-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 2468.0 Percentage of participants
Part A: PlaceboPart A: Percentage of Responders Defined as Achieving More Than or Equal to (>=) 2-point Reduction From Baseline in the Monthly Itch Score at Week 2464.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) stratified analysis adjusted for baseline factors: Baseline Itch Severity (Moderate: \>=4 and less than \[\<\]7, Severe: \>=7); Concomitant cholestatic pruritus treatment regimen (Regimen contains Bile Acid Binding Resin \[BABR\], Regimen does not contain BABR, No defined treatment). Multiple imputation of missing Monthly itch scores was done before deriving responder definitions. Imputed datasets were analyzed using the CMH method and combined.p-value: 0.53995% CI: [-9, 17]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026