Skip to content

A Study To Assess the Safety and Effects of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) Intramuscular Injection in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Platysma Prominence

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BOTOX® (Botulinum Toxin Type A) Purified Neurotoxin Complex for the Treatment of Platysma Prominence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04949399
Enrollment
408
Registered
2021-07-02
Start date
2021-07-08
Completion date
2022-12-20
Last updated
2024-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Platysma Prominence

Keywords

Platysma Prominence, OnabotulinumtoxinA, BOTOX

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effects of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) for the temporary improvement in the appearance of platysma prominence. Study doctors will randomize participants into 1 of the 2 groups, called treatment arms. There is a 1 in 2 chance that a participant will be assigned to placebo. Around 400 participants will be enrolled in the study in the United States and Canada. Participants will receive a single treatment of intramuscular injection of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) or placebo on Day 1 during this 4 month long study. Participants will attend regular monthly visits during the study at the study site.

Interventions

DRUGOnabotulinumtoxinA

Injection

DRUGPlacebo

Saline Injection

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent, approved by an independent ethics committee (IEC)/institutional review board (IRB), prior to the initiation of any screening or study specific procedures * Are willing and able to comply with procedures required in the protocol * Adult male or female, at least 18 years old at the time of signing the informed consent * Good health as determined by medical history, physical examination, vital signs, and investigator's judgment

Exclusion criteria

* Any medical condition that may put the participant at increased medical risk with exposure to BOTOX, including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other condition that might interfere with neuromuscular function * Participant has an anticipated need for treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any indication during the study (other than study intervention) * Anticipated need for surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study * Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding and are considering becoming pregnant or donating eggs during the study * Known immunization or hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin serotype * History of clinically significant (per investigator's judgment) drug or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months * Lower facial and neck hair, scarring (e.g., acne), or other abnormal variations that may interfere with photography (such that photograph is not acceptable) * Tattoos, jewelry, or clothing that cannot be removed, and that obscure the target area of interest

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsEnrollment to Day 120An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a casual relationship with this treatment.
Composite Achievement of Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS and Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS, at Maximum Contraction at Day 14Day 14The Clinician Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (C-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme. The Participant Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (P-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.
Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14Day 14The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.
Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self- Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14Day 14The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 14Day 14The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).
Change From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14Day 14The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact of the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher summary scores (range: 7-35) indicating greater negative psychosocial impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face. For change from baseline in the ANLFQ: Impacts summary score, positive values indicate worsening and negative values indicate improvement in the psychosocial impact.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.
Percentage of Participants With Responses of Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the ANLFQ: Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14Day 14The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14Day 14The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).
Change From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90Days 30, 60, and 90The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact of the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher scores indicating greater negative impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rating of Minimal or Mild According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14Day 14The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.
Percentage of Participants With Responses of Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14Day 14The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the Bother Assessment Scale - Platysma Prominence (BAS-PP) Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14Day 14The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 408 participants were enrolled and randomized in this study (199 subjects to BOTOX; 209 to placebo). A participant was considered to have completed the study if he/she had at least completed the treatment visit and the end of study visit.

Pre-assignment details

The ITT Population included all randomized participants (N=408); the modified ITT Population included all randomized participants with a baseline summary score ≥ 19 on the ANLFQ: Impacts questionnaire (N=367). The Safety Analysis Set included all participants who were treated with at least 1 dose of study drug (N=408).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo was injected into the platysma muscle on Day 1
209
BOTOX
BOTOX (OnabotulinumtoxinA) was injected into the platysma muscle on Day 1
199
Total408

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up116
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboBOTOXTotal
Age, Continuous49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.75
49.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.23
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.98
Age, Customized
40 - 54 years
106 Participants103 Participants209 Participants
Age, Customized
< 40 years
32 Participants32 Participants64 Participants
Age, Customized
55 - 64 years
61 Participants53 Participants114 Participants
Age, Customized
≥ 65 years
10 Participants11 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants33 Participants49 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
193 Participants166 Participants359 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants9 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
186 Participants180 Participants366 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
197 Participants187 Participants384 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2090 / 199
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 20911 / 199
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 2092 / 199

Outcome results

Primary

Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14

The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all randomized participants with a baseline summary score of ≥ 19 for the ANLFQ: Impacts questionnaire. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboAchievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 143.9 percentage of participants
BOTOXAchievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 1443.8 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [32, 47.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self- Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14

The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all randomized participants with a baseline summary score of ≥ 19 for the ANLFQ: Impacts questionnaire. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboAchievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self- Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 143.9 percentage of participants
BOTOXAchievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self- Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 1445.6 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [33.7, 49.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Composite Achievement of Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS and Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS, at Maximum Contraction at Day 14

The Clinician Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (C-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme. The Participant Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (P-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboComposite Achievement of Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS and Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS, at Maximum Contraction at Day 141.9 percentage of participants
BOTOXComposite Achievement of Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS and Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS, at Maximum Contraction at Day 1432.3 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [23.5, 37.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a casual relationship with this treatment.

Time frame: Enrollment to Day 120

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events45 Participants
BOTOXNumber of Participants With Adverse Events47 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90

The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact of the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher scores indicating greater negative impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face.

Time frame: Days 30, 60, and 90

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all randomized participants with a baseline summary score of ≥ 19 for the ANLFQ: Impacts questionnaire. Least squares mean, its standard error (SE), and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90Day 30-2.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90Day 60-2.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90Day 90-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
BOTOXChange From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90Day 30-8.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
BOTOXChange From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90Day 60-7.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
BOTOXChange From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90Day 90-6.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Comparison: Day 30p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6.7, -4.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Day 60p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6, -3.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: Day 90p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-4.9, -2.8]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14

The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact of the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher summary scores (range: 7-35) indicating greater negative psychosocial impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face. For change from baseline in the ANLFQ: Impacts summary score, positive values indicate worsening and negative values indicate improvement in the psychosocial impact.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all randomized participants with a baseline summary score of ≥ 19 for the ANLFQ: Impacts questionnaire. Least squares mean, its standard error (SE), and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
BOTOXChange From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14-7.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6.8, -4.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14

The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact of the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher summary scores (range: 7-35) indicating greater negative psychosocial impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face. For change from baseline in the ANLFQ: Impacts summary score, positive values indicate worsening and negative values indicate improvement in the psychosocial impact.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Least squares mean, its standard error (SE), and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14-1.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
BOTOXChange From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14-7.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6.7, -4.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rating of Minimal or Mild According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14

The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all randomized participants with a baseline summary score of ≥ 19 for the ANLFQ: Impacts questionnaire. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rating of Minimal or Mild According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 145.2 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rating of Minimal or Mild According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 1451.4 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000196% CI: [38.1, 54.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

Time frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 3021.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 9015.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1206.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1419.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 6019.8 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 12021.5 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1480.1 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 6058.5 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 9043.6 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 3075.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 3023.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 12014.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 9020.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 6022.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1423.2 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 6069.7 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1480.5 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 3078.2 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 9049.4 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 12025.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

Time frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 306.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 606.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 904.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1201.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 145.8 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1203.7 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1456.9 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 6023.8 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 3044.1 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 9011.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 307.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1201.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 606.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 904.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 145.1 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 9014.7 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1451.7 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 3045.1 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 6033.4 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120Day 1205.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 14

The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 147.4 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 1452.1 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [36.8, 52.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 14

The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all randomized participants with a baseline summary score of ≥ 19 for the ANLFQ: Impacts questionnaire. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 145.4 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 1450.6 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [37.1, 53.2]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14

The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all randomized participants with a baseline summary score of ≥ 19 for the ANLFQ: Impacts questionnaire. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 1411.3 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 1451.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [31.3, 49]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the Bother Assessment Scale - Platysma Prominence (BAS-PP) Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14

The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the Bother Assessment Scale - Platysma Prominence (BAS-PP) Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 1414.7 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the Bother Assessment Scale - Platysma Prominence (BAS-PP) Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 1453.9 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [30.5, 47.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Responses of Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the ANLFQ: Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14

The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all randomized participants with a baseline summary score of ≥ 19 for the ANLFQ: Impacts questionnaire. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Responses of Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the ANLFQ: Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 1411.7 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants With Responses of Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the ANLFQ: Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 1463.6 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [43.3, 60.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Responses of Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14

The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).

Time frame: Day 14

Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized participants. Responder rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated after using multiple imputation for missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Responses of Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 1411.1 percentage of participants
BOTOXPercentage of Participants With Responses of Satisfied or Very Satisfied on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 1465.9 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [46.8, 62.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026