Skip to content

A Retrospective Observational Study to Describe Anaemia Management, Burden of Disease and Outcomes in Chinese Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis Using a Clinical Database

A Retrospective Observational Study to Describe Anaemia Management, Burden of Disease and Outcomes in Chinese Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis Using a Clinical Database

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04948424
Enrollment
2519
Registered
2021-07-02
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2022-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Brief summary

The overall objective is to describe the epidemiology, health care resource utilisation (HCRU) and selected clinical outcomes in patients initiating PD by anaemia status in real-world setting in China.

Detailed description

Real-world evidence for chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated anemia in China is scarce. This study aims to provide supporting novel evidence for the real-world management and treatment of patients on PD with CKD-associated anemia. This is an observational cohort study using secondary data. The data source is the PD Telemedicine-based Management Platform (PDTAP) database, which is a clinical database that prospectively collects data in patients receiving PD and evaluates PD management and clinical practice in China. The PDTAP database has enrolled around 7,000 patients receiving PD from 27 hospitals in 14 provinces located in all seven geographical regions (northwest, northeast, north, central, southwest, southeast and south) in China. The overall objective is to describe the epidemiology, patient characteristics, treatment patterns relevant to anemia and clinical outcomes in patients on PD in real-world practice in China. Specifically, the incidence and prevalence of anemia will be estimated. The patient characteristics, medication use, select laboratory values and clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) will be described in PD patients with and without anemia. The primary outcomes are 1) the incidence and prevalence of anemia, including the factors that predict the incidence of anemia; 2) the number and percentage of patients who experienced all-cause hospitalizations; 3) adverse clinical outcomes, such as mortality MACE and modified MACE+. The secondary outcomes are 1) hemoglobin levels or anemia, iron variables, medications on anemia management and clinical outcomes in patients with or without inflammation; 2) ESA responsiveness; 3) Other clinical outcomes, such as transfer to hemodialysis and peritonitis. Associations between anemia, anemia-relevant factors and above clinical outcomes can be analyzed in series of paper with specific aims. For example, 1) the relationship between hemoglobin levels or anemia and clinical outcomes (such as mortality, MACE, modified MACE+, hospitalization, transfer to hemodialysis and peritonitis); 2) prognostic factors that predict the incidence of anemia during the follow up; 3) hemoglobin levels or anemia, iron variables, medications on anemia management and clinical outcomes in patients with or without inflammation; 4) the relationship between hemoglobin levels or anemia, erythropoietin responsiveness and clinical outcomes; 5) prognostic factors that predict the hyporesponsiveness to erythropoietin; 6) determine cut-off values of the iron index (such as serum iron, ferritin, TIBC and TSAT) to predicting worse clinical outcomes. Each study could select hemoglobin relevant variables including clinical characteristics and treatment patterns at baseline and/or during the follow up, and explore their associations with specific clinical outcomes. Confounding, interaction or mediation effects could be evaluated. Subgroups, such as with or without diabetes, with or without CVD, with or without inflammation status et al could be analyzed as needed. Cox, competing risk models, Poisson or NegBin regression models may be used as needed.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Army Medical University, China
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Handan Central Hospital, Hebei
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Peking Haidian Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
People's Hospital of Qinghai Province
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Cangzhou Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shengjing Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of BaoTou Medical College
CollaboratorOTHER
The People's Hospital of Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Beijing miyun district hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
People's Hospital of Gansu
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Pingdingshan first people's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The first people's hospital of Xining
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The First Hospital of Jilin University
CollaboratorOTHER
Cangzhou People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Taiyuan central hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
People's hospital of Langfang
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
China Rehabilitation Research Center
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing
CollaboratorOTHER
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Peking University First Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-80 years old at the initiation of peritoneal dialysis * Patients with CKD with the first treatment/initiation of peritoneal dialysis between 1 June 2016 and 30 April 2019 with up to 2 years of follow-up data. * Receiving PD for\>3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with missing age or sex information (proportion of missingness to be assessed) * Patients with diagnosises of any cancer (except for non-melanoma skin cancer) within 12 months prior to and inclusive of the baseline date * Patients with evidence of active bleeding within 30 days and inclusive of the baseline date * Patients with peritoneal dialysis switched from hemodialysis or renal transplantation failure * Individuals receiving temporary PD (duration \< 30 days) because of acute kidney injury.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Select adverse clinical outcomesJune 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020Such as mortality, MACE, modified MACE+
AnemiaJune 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020the incidence and prevalence of anemia; factors that predict the incidence of anemia
Healthcare resource utilisationJune 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020the number and percentage of patients who experienced all-cause hospitalisations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the anemia-related index between patients with and without inflammationJune 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020Anemia-related index for participants with and without inflammation
ESA responsivenessJune 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020Such as describing trajectories of Hb level and ESA dose post-ESA initiation and explore the relationship among erythropoietin responsiveness, hemoglobin levels and clinical outcomes
Select adverse clinical outcomesJune 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020Such as transfer to hemodialysis and peritonitis

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026