Skip to content

Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Two Different Types of Video Laryngoscope Blades

Comparison of the Intubation Condition Between Using Two Types of Blade in Patients Receiving Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope: Channeled Blade vs. Non-channeled Blade

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04948294
Enrollment
118
Registered
2021-07-01
Start date
2018-08-22
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2023-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation Complication

Brief summary

The present study compares two different types of videolaryngoscope blade, which is a channeled and non-channeled blade. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of the type of videolaryngoscope blade on the intubation condition.

Detailed description

In tracheal intubation for general anesthesia, one of the two types of the blade during a video laryngoscopy can be used, one is a channeled blade that has a channel for tracheal tube launching, the other is a non-channeled blade. In the present study, the outcomes by using two types of the videolaryngoscope blade such as the intubation condition, intubation time, first-pass rate, and the incidence of intubation-related complications were compared.

Interventions

In the present group, a tracheal tube was launched in the channel of the blade before tracheal intubation

DEVICENon-channeled blade

In the present group, a tracheal tube was not launched in the videolaryngoscope blade before tracheal intubation

Sponsors

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Patients requiring tracheal intubation for general anesthesia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients receiving tracheal intubation for general anesthesia * Patients with physical status 1, 2, or 3 by American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status.

Exclusion criteria

* Body mass index \<18.5 kg/m2 or \>35 kg/m2 * Patients with a history of airway surgery * Patients with increased risk of aspiration * Patients who have any pathology (polyp, tumor, or inflammation) in the upper airway and larynx

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation timeImmediately after tracheal intubation completedthe time for tracheal intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First-pass rateImmediately after tracheal intubation completedthe success rate of tracheal intubation with one attempt
Intubation-related complicationswithin 24 hours after surgerythe incidence of overall complications related with tracheal intubation

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026