Enteral Feeding Intolerance, Feeding Behavior, Preterm
Conditions
Keywords
Preterm, Feeding Readiness, Oral feeding, sensorimotor intervention, neonatal nursing
Brief summary
To examine the effects of sensorimotor interventions applied to in preterm infants on readiness for feeding and oral feeding success.
Detailed description
The preterm neonate population cannot potentially be fed orally for a long time in the postnatal period. However, the inability of preterm infants to be fed orally as soon as they are born is not a disease, their adaptation to the external environment of the uterus is more complicated because their physiological functions are not yet mature. This also means long hospital stays for premature babies. Therefore, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has determined that oral feeding is one of the main criteria for the discharge of the preterm infant from the hospital. Many studies have been conducted on preterm infants on optimizing oral feeding performance. Studies improve oral feeding skills of preterm infants by applying various sensorimotor interventions and cue-based feeding protocols to improve oral feeding performance. These sensorimotor interventions; non-nutritive sucking (pacifier), sucking-swallowing exercises, oral support, oral stimulation, tactile stimulation, kinesthetic stimulation, sound, smell, audio-visual stimulations, etc. methods were used alone or in combination with these methods. It has been shown in studies that sensorimotor interventions increase the success of oral feeding in preterms, increase the daily feeding volume, increase weight gain, reduce the cost by shortening the hospital stay, shorten the transition time from gastric feeding to oral/breastfeeding and help mother-infant bonding. This thesis study was conducted using evidence-based interventions that can facilitate the development of oral feeding skills in preterm infants, the feeding problems they encounter, and their transition from gastric feeding to oral feeding.
Interventions
OTHERSensorimotor Interventions (Tactile/Kinesthetic Stimulation+Nonnutritive Sucking)
Sensorimotor interventions were applied to in preterm infants between 30-33 weeks of age for 10 days. After that, preterms were included in the Six-phase feeding progression protocol.
Sponsors
Pamukkale University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The stratified block randomization method was used to determine which group the preterm infants to be included in the study would be in. Stratification was based on gestational age. The phase of inclusion in the study and control groups was carried out by another investigator in order to avoid study bias with block randomization.
Intervention model description
This research is a randomized controlled study with a control group design with pre-test and post-test measurements from experimental research designs.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Weeks to 33 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* The mother's milk * Preterm babies with a gestational age of 30-33 weeks * No facial deformity, * No respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and neurological disorders or syndromes that would prevent or complicate oral feeding, * No need for oxygen support, * There will be preterm infants who are not fed orally, but who are started with tube (Orogastric) feeding.
Exclusion criteria
* Transferred to another center during the research, * Unexpected complication development during the research, * Occurrence of a pathology that will prevent or complicate oral feeding, * In cases where there is no voluntary consent of the parent * The mother is Covid positive
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Oral Feeding Readiness | 10 days change in T-POFRAS (feeding readiness) after sensorimotor intervention. | Turkish version of the Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale (T-POFRAS):It was administered to in preterm infants before and after 10 days of intervention by a neonatal nurse independent of the researcher. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Oral Feeding Success | Change in oral feeding success level according to the 12-day six-phase feeding progression protocol | Six-phase feeding progression protocol |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed