Ambulation Difficulty, Hemiplegia, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Rehabilitation, Functional electrical stimulation, Walking, Stroke
Brief summary
The purpose of this project is to investigate the effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) for recovery of dorsiflexion after stroke. It will be led from the University Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at Danderyd Hospital (RMDS) in collaboration with the MoveAbility Lab at KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Patients referred to RMDS for inpatient rehabilitation early after hemiparetic stroke will be included. The overall aim is to explore how 4 weeks of training incorporating the FES-system (L300 Go System ® Bioness, Ottobock) effect function of the lower extremity, gait function and mobility when compared to conventional training only, in the subacute stage after stroke.
Detailed description
Participants will be included and allocated to either experimental group with training incorporating the FES-system and conventional training or to control group with conventional training only. Data will be collected before and after the intervention at RMDS and at the MoveAbility Lab. Physical tests and self-scored questionnaires of self-perceived aspects of functioning and disability will be performed at RMDS and gait analysis with 3D cameras and assessment of muscle function with EMG will be performed at the MoveAbilityLab. In addition, a short assessment of body function and activity will be performed weekly at RMDS by the therapist responsible for the rehabilitation intervention. The experimental group will wear the FES-system L300 Go at all times when the patient is taking part in rehabilitation interventions involving the lower extremity led or instructed by a physiotherapist. The settings will be adjusted by the employee from the technical company and/or the physiotherapist continuously during the intervention if needed. The system will register the distance and time accomplished during each session. Due to risk of skin irritation, if the system is overused in the beginning the experimental group will have access to an ankle-foot-orthosis too. The control group will wear an ankle-foot-orthosis (AFO) and receive conventional training. The control group will wear a FES-system too, to record the distance and time accomplished during each session, but the system will not be active for stimulation.
Interventions
DEVICEFES and Conventional training
The experimental group will be fitted with the Functional electrical stimulation system L300 Go to be used during 4 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation in the subacute phase after hemiplegic stroke. Settings will be adjusted continuously to enhance dorsiflexion of the affected foot during walking and mobility training.
DEVICEAFO and Conventional training
The control group will be fitted with an ankle-foot-orthosis (AFO) according to clinical practice to enhance dorsiflexion of the foot while taking part in conventional rehabilitation interventions during 4 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation including walking and mobility training in the subacute phase after hemiplegic stroke
Sponsors
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Danderyd Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The assessor will be blinded to the patients´ allocation in terms of intervention
Intervention model description
Randomized controlled trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Eligible will be patients who have suffered a stroke, verified by CT or MRI examination and are admitted to inpatient care at the University Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Stockholm, Danderyd Hospital in Sweden where approximately 220 patients are treated annually (Stroke (50%)). Inclusion criteria: * 20 participants with hemiplegia * Dependence in ambulation (0- 4 according to the Functional Ambulation Categories) * \>= 50 points on the Trunc Control Test. * Impaired dorsiflexion manifested as impaired voluntarily dorsiflex and to hold the ankle in a dorsiflexed position while sitting and for ambulatory participants: during swing phase and heel strike while walking as demonstrated by visual inspection during gait analysis performed by the physiotherapist. * Recommended to be fitted with an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) by an experienced physiotherapist. * Able to understand study information and to give informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Contracture severely restricting gait movements at any lower limb joint * Cardiovascular or other somatic condition incompatible with intensive gait training * Notifiable infectious disease, contagious infections (e.g. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) or Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase bacteria (ESBL)). - Not able to participate in the rehabilitation intervention due to behavioral disorder or psychiatric disease. * The FES-system L300 Go ® should not be used if a the patient has a pacemaker, defibrillator or any electrical implant, a metallic implant in the affected leg, a cancerous lesion in the affected leg, a fracture or dislocation in the affected leg or if the affected leg is swollen, infected, or has inflamed areas or skin eruptions, such as phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, and varicose veins in the affected leg or if the patient is pregnant.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Gait Profile Score (GPS) | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | GPS is a single index measure that summarises the overall deviation of kinematic gait data relative to normative data. The GPS can be decomposed to provide the Gait Variable Score (GVS) (an index that measures single gait variable deviation), for nine key relevant kinematic variables. A larger GPS indicates greater deviation from normal gait |
| Ankle Sagittal range (degrees) | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses range of motion in the ankle (plantarflexion from 0-50 degrees, dorsiflexion from 0-20 degrees) |
| Ankle Positive work | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses the force at the ankle joint (J/kg) detected in gait laboratory |
| Step length | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Step length will be assessed in the gait laboratory with 3D gait analyses |
| 6 minutes walk test | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses walking endurance in meters walked |
| Rated Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Ratings (min 6, max 20) according to the RPE scale are made at the end of the 6 minutes walk test. A higher score indicates a higher degree of perceived exertion. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Balance evaluation systems test (BEST-test) | At baseline, weekly during the intervention and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses postural control, incorporating bio-mechanical systems, limits of stability, anticipatory postural adjustment, automatic postural responses, sensory orientation, stability in gait (0p max impairment summed up to 108p no impairment) |
| The 10 meter walk test | At baseline, weekly during the intervention and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses gait speed |
| 6 minutes walk test | At baseline, weekly during the intervention and after the intervention to assess change | Assesses walking endurance in meters walked |
| Rated Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale | At baseline, weekly during the intervention and after the intervention to assess change | Ratings (min 6, max 20) according to the RPE scale are made at the end of the 6 minutes walk test. |
| Indirect Calorimetries | At baseline and after the intervention to assess change | To assess energy expenditure based on respiratory gas exchange. Will be performed during the 6 minutes walk test. |
| Electromyography (EMG) | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | EMG is used to measure muscle activation patterns during gait. |
| Walking impact scale (MSWS-12 S) | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses self-perceived limitations in walking (12p no impairments summed up to 60p max impairment) |
| The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses mental function (0p max impairment summed up to 30p no detected impairment) |
| Falls Efficacy Scale (FES-S) | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses self perceived balance in every day life activities rated on a 11 point scale (0p not safe at all 10p completely safe). Total score: 0- 130 p |
| Barthel Index | At baseline, weekly during the intervention and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses independence in mobility and personal care (0p dependent 10/15p independent) Total score 0-100p |
| Eq-5d-5l | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses self perceived health related quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) and on a vertical visual analogue scale. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Responses are coded as single-digit numbers expressing the severity level selected in each dimension (1 = no problem, 5 = extreme problems). The vertical visual analogue scale is graded from 0-100 (0 = the worst health you can imagine 100 = the best health you can imagine). |
| A study specific questionnaire - a questionnaire for the experimental group | After completion of the 4 week intervention | A questionnaire with 11 questions assessing the patients experience of participating in the study and the use of the FES-system. The patient rates on a 10 graded scale (0 = not at all, 10 = very much): the information given about the study, the experience, usability and comfort of using the system, eventual pain, skin problems and technical problems with the system and experience of eventual benefits from having used the system. |
| Distance accomplished during each training session | Daily during the intervention | The FES-system will collect this data to assess training intensity |
| Time accomplished during each training session | Daily during the intervention | The FES-system will collect this data to assess training intensity |
| The Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) | At baseline, weekly during the intervention and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses independence in walking (0p nonfunctional, 5p independent) Total score 0-5p |
| Fugl-Meyer score (FMA-LE) | At baseline, weekly during the intervention and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Assesses sensory and movement related functions in the lower extremity (0p max impairment summed up to 86p max no detected impairment) |
| Neuroflexor | At baseline, weekly during the intervention, and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Medical technology device. Assesses spasticity by identifying the neural, viscous and elastic components during passive movement using a biomechanical algorithm (presented in Newton) |
| Modified Ashworth scale 0-5 | At baseline, weekly during the intervention and after completion of the 4 week intervention, to assess change. | Assesses spasticity on a 6 point scale/muscle (0p no impairment, 5p max impairment/muscle) |
| Passive range of motion in the lower extremity | At baseline, weekly during the intervention and after completion of the 4 week intervention to assess change. | Clinical assessment of range of motion with a goniometer |
| Medical Research Council scale | At baseline and after completion of the 4 week intervention | Assesses muscle strength on a 6 point scale/muscle (0p max impairment summed up to 5p no impairment/muscle) |
Countries
Sweden
Contacts
Primary ContactSusanne Palmcrantz, PhD
Outcome results
None listed