Skip to content

Effects of Music and Maternal Voice on Sedation Depth and Sedative Use During Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Effects of Music and Maternal Voice on Sedation Depth and Sedative Use During Pediatric

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04944875
Enrollment
210
Registered
2021-06-30
Start date
2019-05-01
Completion date
2021-05-01
Last updated
2021-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pediatric Brain Tumor, Pediatric Cancer, Pediatric Solid Tumor

Keywords

Magnetic Resonance, sedation, maternal voice, sedative effects

Brief summary

To evaluate the effects of music and maternal voice in children on sedation depth and sedative use during pediatric magnetic resonance imaging.

Detailed description

When the patients and their parents arrived in the magnetic resonance unıt about 30 minutes before the procedure, the anesthetist is obtained a medical history and carried out a physical examination and clinical assesment. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: music, maternal voice and isolation. During the procedures,the patients in the music group listened to Vivaldi's The Four Seasons violin concertos by sound isolating headphones, whereas the patients in the isolation group wore the headphones but did not listen to music. All patients were sedated by midazolam and propofol. During the procedure, an additional propofol was administered as required

Interventions

PROCEDUREGroup headphone

The patients in the first group wore the headphones but did not listen the music or maternal voice. The standard sedation method was applied to all patients.

PROCEDUREGroup music

The patients in the second group listened to classical music (Vivaldi's The Four Seasons violin concertos) by sound- isolating headphones through the procedure.The standard sedation method was applied to all patients.

PROCEDUREGroup maternal voice

The patients in the third group listened to maternal voice by sound- isolating headphones through the procedure.The standard sedation method was applied to all patients.

Sponsors

TC Erciyes University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with hearing impairment, distorted ear anatomy, recent organ or system deficiency, severe pulmonary and/or cardiovascular problems, intolerance to propofol, airway ab-normalities, or known psychiatric or mental problems were ex-cluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
amount of propofol dose used in sedationduring the MRI procedureThe total propofol dosage were recorded in during procedure.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026