Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Conditions
Keywords
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, ALS, CK-2127107, Reldesemtiv, COURAGE-ALS
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of reldesemtiv versus placebo on functional outcomes in ALS.
Detailed description
COURAGE-ALS is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of reldesemtiv in patients aged 18 to 80 with ALS. The screening and qualification period for the trial will be no more than 21 days in duration. Approximately 555 eligible ALS patients will be randomized (2:1) to receive the following dose of reldesemtiv or placebo (stratified by riluzole use/non-use and edaravone use/non-use) for the first 24 weeks (double-blind, placebo-controlled period): * 300 mg reldesemtiv twice a day for a 600 mg total daily dose (TDD) * Placebo twice daily At the end of the 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period, patients will transition to the active drug period, where all patients will receive the following dose of reldesemtiv for the next 24 weeks: * 300 mg reldesemtiv twice a day for a 600 mg TDD for patients who were not down titrated during the 24 weeks of blinded dosing * 150 mg reldesemtiv twice a day for a 300 mg TDD for patients who were down titrated during the 24 weeks of blinded dosing
Interventions
Reldesemtiv Oral Tablet
Placebo Oral Tablet
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: * Males or Females between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age, inclusive * Diagnosis of familial or sporadic ALS (defined as meeting the laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite criteria for ALS according to the World Federation of Neurology El Escorial criteria). Patients who meet the possible criteria are eligible if they have lower motor neuron findings; those who have purely upper motor neuron findings are ineligible. * First symptom of ALS ≤ 24 months prior to screening. The qualifying first symptoms of ALS are limited to manifestations of weakness in extremity, bulbar, or respiratory muscles. * ALSFRS-R total score ≤ 44 at screening. Patients with a total score of 45 or higher may be rescreened 60±7 days following the original screening date. * Upright FVC ≥ 65.0% of predicted for age, height, sex and ethnicity at screening according to Global Lung Initiative equation * Must be either on riluzole for ≥ 30 days prior to screening or have not taken it for at least 30 days prior to screening * Must have completed at least 2 cycles of edaravone at the time of screening or have not received it for at least 30 days prior to screening * Able to swallow whole tablets
Exclusion criteria
* eGFRCysC \< 45.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 at screening * Urine protein/creatinine ratio \> 1 mg/mg (113 mg/mmol) at screening * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 3-times the upper limit of normal (ULN) * Total bilirubin (TBL), direct or indirect bilirubin above the ULN. * Cognitive impairment, related to ALS or otherwise that impairs the patient's ability to understand and/or comply with study procedures and provide informed consent * Other medically significant neurological conditions that could interfere with the assessment of ALS symptoms, signs or progression. * Has a tracheostomy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Functional Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) | Baseline to Week 24 | Change from baseline to Week 24 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score using MMRM without multiple imputation; rating scale 0 to 48; higher scores indicate better functional status |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Combined Functional and Survival Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) | Baseline to Week 24 | Composite Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) compares ranked outcomes based on change from baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score (0-48; higher scores indicate better function), time in months to dependence on assisted ventilation (DOAV) and time in months to death. Deceased participants are ranked by time-to-death; earliest deaths ranked the lowest. DOAV survivors are ranked more favorably than those who have died but lower than those alive and not DOAV. Non-DOAV survivors are ranked based on change in ALSFRS-R (largest decline in ALSFRS-R ranked lower than less decline or improvement in ALSFRS-R). Unitless ranked scores range from 1-482 (Full Analysis Set) with larger rank scores associated with a better outcome. Ranks were analyzed using stratified Wilcoxon test comparing the ranked scores between reldesemtiv and placebo, adjusting for baseline riluzole and edaravone use. The win probability and the ratio (reldesemtiv vs placebo) are presented. |
| Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Ventilatory Function | Baseline to Week 24 | Change from baseline in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) using an in-clinic spirometer; a negative number for change from baseline indicates respiratory function decline relative to baseline |
| Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Quality of Life | Baseline to Week 24 | Change from baseline in ALSAQ-40 total score. ALSAQ-40 = Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire; summary scores range from 0 (best health status) to 100 (worst health status); ALSAQ-40 total score is calculated as the sum of the summary scores from the 5 domains; lower score corresponds to better health-related quality of life. |
| Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Handgrip Strength | Baseline to Week 24 | Change from baseline in maximum handgrip strength (average of both hands) measured bilaterally by an electronic hand dynamometer |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Three participants were randomized but never dosed in the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind Period Participants in this arm take 2 reldesemtiv 150 mg oral tablets twice a day for a 600 mg total daily dose from Day 1 until Week 24.
Reldesemtiv: Reldesemtiv Oral Tablet | 325 |
| Placebo Group, Double-Blind Period Participants in this arm take 2 placebo oral tablets twice a day from Day 1 until Week 24.
Placebo: Placebo Oral Tablet | 161 |
| Total | 486 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Drug Period | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Active Drug Period | Death | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Active Drug Period | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Active Drug Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Active Drug Period | Participant Choice | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Active Drug Period | Planned Medical Assistance in Dying | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Active Drug Period | Progressive Disease | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Active Drug Period | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 0 | 0 | 49 | 92 |
| Active Drug Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| Double-blind Period | Adverse Event | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period | Death | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period | Participant Choice | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period | Physician Decision | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period | Planned Medical Assistance in Dying | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period | Progressive Disease | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period | Sponsor Request | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 96 | 46 | 0 | 0 |
| Double-blind Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo Group, Double-Blind Period | Total | Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79 | 59.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.92 | 59.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 |
| ALSAQ-40 Total Score | 31.6 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8 | 29.9 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 | 29.1 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.56 |
| ALSFRS-R total score | 36.6 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.44 | 37.0 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.14 | 37.2 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.97 |
| Average Maximum Handgrip Strength | 38.28 pounds STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.439 | 39.58 pounds STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.216 | 40.22 pounds STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.122 |
| Body Mass Index | 26.4 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.41 | 26.8 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29 | 26.9 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.67 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 12 Participants | 27 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 132 Participants | 410 Participants | 278 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 17 Participants | 49 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Forced vital capacity (FVC) percent predicted | 85.8 percent predicted STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.19 | 84.9 percent predicted STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.53 | 84.5 percent predicted STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.69 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 3 Participants | 9 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 5 Participants | 14 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 149 Participants | 457 Participants | 308 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 5 Participants | 27 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 1 Participants | 7 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 24 Participants | 72 Participants | 48 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Denmark | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 14 Participants | 38 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 11 Participants | 46 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ireland | 2 Participants | 8 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 11 Participants | 32 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 7 Participants | 12 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 7 Participants | 16 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Portugal | 3 Participants | 15 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 10 Participants | 39 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Sweden | 7 Participants | 15 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 56 Participants | 153 Participants | 97 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 64 Participants | 177 Participants | 113 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 97 Participants | 309 Participants | 212 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 9 / 325 | 6 / 161 | 5 / 96 | 8 / 180 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 258 / 325 | 125 / 161 | 65 / 96 | 122 / 180 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 41 / 325 | 25 / 161 | 14 / 96 | 33 / 180 |
Outcome results
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Functional Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Change from baseline to Week 24 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score using MMRM without multiple imputation; rating scale 0 to 48; higher scores indicate better functional status
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Functional Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) | -5.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.307 |
| Placebo Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Functional Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) | -4.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.42 |
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Combined Functional and Survival Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
Composite Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) compares ranked outcomes based on change from baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score (0-48; higher scores indicate better function), time in months to dependence on assisted ventilation (DOAV) and time in months to death. Deceased participants are ranked by time-to-death; earliest deaths ranked the lowest. DOAV survivors are ranked more favorably than those who have died but lower than those alive and not DOAV. Non-DOAV survivors are ranked based on change in ALSFRS-R (largest decline in ALSFRS-R ranked lower than less decline or improvement in ALSFRS-R). Unitless ranked scores range from 1-482 (Full Analysis Set) with larger rank scores associated with a better outcome. Ranks were analyzed using stratified Wilcoxon test comparing the ranked scores between reldesemtiv and placebo, adjusting for baseline riluzole and edaravone use. The win probability and the ratio (reldesemtiv vs placebo) are presented.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Combined Functional and Survival Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) | 232.5 unitless |
| Placebo Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Combined Functional and Survival Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) | 264.0 unitless |
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Handgrip Strength
Change from baseline in maximum handgrip strength (average of both hands) measured bilaterally by an electronic hand dynamometer
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Handgrip Strength | -10.134 pounds | Standard Deviation 9.6821 |
| Placebo Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Handgrip Strength | -7.370 pounds | Standard Deviation 9.7733 |
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Quality of Life
Change from baseline in ALSAQ-40 total score. ALSAQ-40 = Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire; summary scores range from 0 (best health status) to 100 (worst health status); ALSAQ-40 total score is calculated as the sum of the summary scores from the 5 domains; lower score corresponds to better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Quality of Life | 11.426 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.2102 |
| Placebo Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Quality of Life | 9.766 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.3662 |
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Ventilatory Function
Change from baseline in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) using an in-clinic spirometer; a negative number for change from baseline indicates respiratory function decline relative to baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Ventilatory Function | -10.562 percent predicted | Standard Deviation 12.8178 |
| Placebo Group, Double-Blind Period | Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Ventilatory Function | -9.677 percent predicted | Standard Deviation 13.1073 |