Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reldesemtiv in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reldesemtiv in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04944784
Acronym
COURAGE-ALS
Enrollment
489
Registered
2021-06-30
Start date
2021-08-16
Completion date
2023-07-18
Last updated
2024-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, ALS, CK-2127107, Reldesemtiv, COURAGE-ALS

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of reldesemtiv versus placebo on functional outcomes in ALS.

Detailed description

COURAGE-ALS is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of reldesemtiv in patients aged 18 to 80 with ALS. The screening and qualification period for the trial will be no more than 21 days in duration. Approximately 555 eligible ALS patients will be randomized (2:1) to receive the following dose of reldesemtiv or placebo (stratified by riluzole use/non-use and edaravone use/non-use) for the first 24 weeks (double-blind, placebo-controlled period): * 300 mg reldesemtiv twice a day for a 600 mg total daily dose (TDD) * Placebo twice daily At the end of the 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period, patients will transition to the active drug period, where all patients will receive the following dose of reldesemtiv for the next 24 weeks: * 300 mg reldesemtiv twice a day for a 600 mg TDD for patients who were not down titrated during the 24 weeks of blinded dosing * 150 mg reldesemtiv twice a day for a 300 mg TDD for patients who were down titrated during the 24 weeks of blinded dosing

Interventions

Reldesemtiv Oral Tablet

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo Oral Tablet

Sponsors

Cytokinetics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Males or Females between the ages of 18 and 80 years of age, inclusive * Diagnosis of familial or sporadic ALS (defined as meeting the laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite criteria for ALS according to the World Federation of Neurology El Escorial criteria). Patients who meet the possible criteria are eligible if they have lower motor neuron findings; those who have purely upper motor neuron findings are ineligible. * First symptom of ALS ≤ 24 months prior to screening. The qualifying first symptoms of ALS are limited to manifestations of weakness in extremity, bulbar, or respiratory muscles. * ALSFRS-R total score ≤ 44 at screening. Patients with a total score of 45 or higher may be rescreened 60±7 days following the original screening date. * Upright FVC ≥ 65.0% of predicted for age, height, sex and ethnicity at screening according to Global Lung Initiative equation * Must be either on riluzole for ≥ 30 days prior to screening or have not taken it for at least 30 days prior to screening * Must have completed at least 2 cycles of edaravone at the time of screening or have not received it for at least 30 days prior to screening * Able to swallow whole tablets

Exclusion criteria

* eGFRCysC \< 45.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 at screening * Urine protein/creatinine ratio \> 1 mg/mg (113 mg/mmol) at screening * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 3-times the upper limit of normal (ULN) * Total bilirubin (TBL), direct or indirect bilirubin above the ULN. * Cognitive impairment, related to ALS or otherwise that impairs the patient's ability to understand and/or comply with study procedures and provide informed consent * Other medically significant neurological conditions that could interfere with the assessment of ALS symptoms, signs or progression. * Has a tracheostomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Functional Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)Baseline to Week 24Change from baseline to Week 24 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score using MMRM without multiple imputation; rating scale 0 to 48; higher scores indicate better functional status

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Combined Functional and Survival Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)Baseline to Week 24Composite Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) compares ranked outcomes based on change from baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score (0-48; higher scores indicate better function), time in months to dependence on assisted ventilation (DOAV) and time in months to death. Deceased participants are ranked by time-to-death; earliest deaths ranked the lowest. DOAV survivors are ranked more favorably than those who have died but lower than those alive and not DOAV. Non-DOAV survivors are ranked based on change in ALSFRS-R (largest decline in ALSFRS-R ranked lower than less decline or improvement in ALSFRS-R). Unitless ranked scores range from 1-482 (Full Analysis Set) with larger rank scores associated with a better outcome. Ranks were analyzed using stratified Wilcoxon test comparing the ranked scores between reldesemtiv and placebo, adjusting for baseline riluzole and edaravone use. The win probability and the ratio (reldesemtiv vs placebo) are presented.
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Ventilatory FunctionBaseline to Week 24Change from baseline in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) using an in-clinic spirometer; a negative number for change from baseline indicates respiratory function decline relative to baseline
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Quality of LifeBaseline to Week 24Change from baseline in ALSAQ-40 total score. ALSAQ-40 = Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire; summary scores range from 0 (best health status) to 100 (worst health status); ALSAQ-40 total score is calculated as the sum of the summary scores from the 5 domains; lower score corresponds to better health-related quality of life.
Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Handgrip StrengthBaseline to Week 24Change from baseline in maximum handgrip strength (average of both hands) measured bilaterally by an electronic hand dynamometer

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Three participants were randomized but never dosed in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind Period
Participants in this arm take 2 reldesemtiv 150 mg oral tablets twice a day for a 600 mg total daily dose from Day 1 until Week 24. Reldesemtiv: Reldesemtiv Oral Tablet
325
Placebo Group, Double-Blind Period
Participants in this arm take 2 placebo oral tablets twice a day from Day 1 until Week 24. Placebo: Placebo Oral Tablet
161
Total486

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Active Drug PeriodAdverse Event0036
Active Drug PeriodDeath0034
Active Drug PeriodLack of Efficacy0022
Active Drug PeriodLost to Follow-up0001
Active Drug PeriodParticipant Choice0001
Active Drug PeriodPlanned Medical Assistance in Dying0001
Active Drug PeriodProgressive Disease0044
Active Drug PeriodStudy Terminated by Sponsor004992
Active Drug PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0047
Double-blind PeriodAdverse Event20400
Double-blind PeriodDeath7200
Double-blind PeriodLack of Efficacy0100
Double-blind PeriodParticipant Choice1100
Double-blind PeriodPhysician Decision2100
Double-blind PeriodPlanned Medical Assistance in Dying0300
Double-blind PeriodProgressive Disease2200
Double-blind PeriodSponsor Request2100
Double-blind PeriodStudy Terminated by Sponsor964600
Double-blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject15400

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo Group, Double-Blind PeriodTotalReldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind Period
Age, Continuous59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.79
59.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.92
59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
ALSAQ-40 Total Score31.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8
29.9 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
29.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.56
ALSFRS-R total score36.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.44
37.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.14
37.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.97
Average Maximum Handgrip Strength38.28 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.439
39.58 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.216
40.22 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.122
Body Mass Index26.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.41
26.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29
26.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.67
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants27 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
132 Participants410 Participants278 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
17 Participants49 Participants32 Participants
Forced vital capacity (FVC) percent predicted85.8 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.19
84.9 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.53
84.5 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.69
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
149 Participants457 Participants308 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
5 Participants27 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
1 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
24 Participants72 Participants48 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
14 Participants38 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
11 Participants46 Participants35 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
11 Participants32 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
7 Participants12 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
7 Participants16 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
3 Participants15 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
10 Participants39 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
7 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
56 Participants153 Participants97 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants177 Participants113 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
97 Participants309 Participants212 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
9 / 3256 / 1615 / 968 / 180
other
Total, other adverse events
258 / 325125 / 16165 / 96122 / 180
serious
Total, serious adverse events
41 / 32525 / 16114 / 9633 / 180

Outcome results

Primary

Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Functional Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Change from baseline to Week 24 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score using MMRM without multiple imputation; rating scale 0 to 48; higher scores indicate better functional status

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Functional Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)-5.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.307
Placebo Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Functional Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)-4.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.42
Secondary

Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Combined Functional and Survival Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Composite Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) compares ranked outcomes based on change from baseline in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score (0-48; higher scores indicate better function), time in months to dependence on assisted ventilation (DOAV) and time in months to death. Deceased participants are ranked by time-to-death; earliest deaths ranked the lowest. DOAV survivors are ranked more favorably than those who have died but lower than those alive and not DOAV. Non-DOAV survivors are ranked based on change in ALSFRS-R (largest decline in ALSFRS-R ranked lower than less decline or improvement in ALSFRS-R). Unitless ranked scores range from 1-482 (Full Analysis Set) with larger rank scores associated with a better outcome. Ranks were analyzed using stratified Wilcoxon test comparing the ranked scores between reldesemtiv and placebo, adjusting for baseline riluzole and edaravone use. The win probability and the ratio (reldesemtiv vs placebo) are presented.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Combined Functional and Survival Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)232.5 unitless
Placebo Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Combined Functional and Survival Outcomes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)264.0 unitless
Secondary

Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Handgrip Strength

Change from baseline in maximum handgrip strength (average of both hands) measured bilaterally by an electronic hand dynamometer

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Handgrip Strength-10.134 poundsStandard Deviation 9.6821
Placebo Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Handgrip Strength-7.370 poundsStandard Deviation 9.7733
Secondary

Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Quality of Life

Change from baseline in ALSAQ-40 total score. ALSAQ-40 = Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire; summary scores range from 0 (best health status) to 100 (worst health status); ALSAQ-40 total score is calculated as the sum of the summary scores from the 5 domains; lower score corresponds to better health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Quality of Life11.426 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2102
Placebo Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Quality of Life9.766 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3662
Secondary

Effect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Ventilatory Function

Change from baseline in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) using an in-clinic spirometer; a negative number for change from baseline indicates respiratory function decline relative to baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reldesemtiv Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Ventilatory Function-10.562 percent predictedStandard Deviation 12.8178
Placebo Group, Double-Blind PeriodEffect of Reldesemtiv Versus Placebo on Ventilatory Function-9.677 percent predictedStandard Deviation 13.1073

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026