Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Snow-plowTechnique Versus Bulk Fill Technique in Restorations of Class II Cavities

Clinical Evaluation of Snow-Plow Technique Versus Bulk Fill Technique in Restoration of Class II Cavities: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04943120
Enrollment
32
Registered
2021-06-29
Start date
2021-08-30
Completion date
2023-02-27
Last updated
2024-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Class II Dental Caries

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to assess the performance of snow-plow technique as compared to Bulk Fill technique in restoration of class II cavities.

Detailed description

1. With limited evidence-based information about the clinical performance of resin composite in class II cavities. it is beneficial to compare the newly introduced snow-plow' technique using a randomized clinical trial to test the null hypothesis that this new technique has the same clinical performance. 2. The comparator will be the bulk fill technique as an alternative to the conventional layering technique. This is because it has shown lower polymerization shrinkage when comparing it to the conventional composite. Bulk fill has reduced the chair time for the patient. It is done by the application of 4mm increment and cured at once. 3. Patients are selected according to the eligibility criteria discussed in the following section. 4. local anesthesia will be administered and the operative field will be isolated before starting the restorative procedure. A standard class II cavity will be prepared at the two-surface cavities. 5. The preparation will be performed using rotary instrumentation for cavity preparation by a water-cooled high-speed hand-piece by the same operator. 6. The teeth are then restored using one of the two techniques according to their allocation with the same steps discussed in the different arms. 7. The restorations are assessed using the modified USPHS criteria at the time intervals stated in the outcome measures.

Interventions

PROCEDURESnow-plow technique

In class II cavities, application of X-tra Base bulk fill flowable composite (VOCO) in 1 mm thickness without curing followed by X-tra Fill bulk fill packable composite (VOCO) to restore the proximal wall. Polymerization as one unit for 20 seconds.

PROCEDUREBulk fill technique

In class II cavities, application of 4 mm increment of X-tra Fill bulk fill packable composite (VOCO) to restore the proximal wall. then the restoration id fully polymerized.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

1:1

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* class II carious lesions in premolars and molars. * Vital upper or lower teeth with no signs of irreversible pulpitis. * Presence of favorable occlusion and teeth are in normal contact with the adjacent teeth.

Exclusion criteria

* Deep carious defects (close to pulp, less than 1 mm distance). * Periapical pathology or signs of pulpal pathology. * Endodontically treated teeth * Tooth hypersensitivity. * Possible prosthodontic restoration of teeth. * Heavy occlusion or occlusal contacts or history of bruxism. * Severe periodontal affection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical performanceday 1USPHS Criteria

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026