Skip to content

Rehabilitation After Acute Coronary Syndrome: a New Telemonitoring Strategy

Prevention and Rehabilitation After Acute Coronary Syndrome: a New Telemonitoring Strategy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04942977
Enrollment
67
Registered
2021-06-29
Start date
2019-05-28
Completion date
2020-12-07
Last updated
2021-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angina, Unstable, Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI), ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

Keywords

mobile health, monitoring, cardiac rehabilitation, telerehabilitation, secondary prevention

Brief summary

Cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome is recognised in the latest guidelines and recommendations published by the major scientific societies as a class I indication. Despite this evidence, the number of patients entering such programmes in Europe is still around 30%. The present study aims to validate a new comprehensive Telerehabilitation System to provide support for cardiac rehabilitation, to optimize it and to test its usefulness in terms of improving adherence to physical exercise and cardiovascular risk parameters.

Detailed description

To validate this approach, a clinical trial was designed to compare a 10-month program of cardiac telerehabilitation with a conventional 8-week centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Seventy patients will be randomized 1:1 to cardiac telemonitoring or centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. The characteristics of the interventions do not allow the study to be blinded to the patient or the professional. However, the analyses, stress tests and questionaires will be carried out in a masked form without the assigned group being identified by the researchers carrying out the examinations. Assessment for primary and main secondary outcomes will be performed at baseline and at ten months of follow-up, and will include self-reported physical activity (IPAQ), VO2max, blood test, general emotional distress, Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, quality of life, vital signs, returning to work. The hypothesis is that patients randomised to prolonged telemonitoring will demonstrate higher levels of physical activity at 10-month follow-up, compared to patients in the centre-based cardiac rehabilitation programme, as well other positive changes in the cardiovascular risk profile.

Interventions

DEVICEtelemonitoring

The system consists of the following elements: 1. Professional website at the hospital, which allows: * To set up an individualised care plan * To establish the patient's risk profile and targets for improvement. * Long-term monitoring of the evolution of cardiovascular risk factors and events that occurred * Advise the patient on self-management strategies. 2. Mobile application software with the following functions: * Scheduled exercise sessions * Medication reminder * Measurement reminder (weight, blood pressure, heart rate, waist circumference, etc.) * Messages: Inbox folder for system messages and messages generated by professionals for a specific patient or video conference. * Training monitor: guides the patient in the performance of their exercise. * Access to certified health information for patients

The physical activity consisted of a workout routine and aerobic cycling training. Patients are instructed to perform 150 minutes per week of moderate physical activity when the hospital phase finishes.

Sponsors

Catcronic Salut SL
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

The characteristics of the interventions do not allow the study to be blinded either for the patient or for the professional. However, the analyses, stress tests and shuttle tests will be performed in a masked manner without the assigned group being identified by the investigators who carry out the examinations.

Intervention model description

Phase III clinical trial, feasibility, controlled and randomized, with two arms: cardiac telerehabilitation (intervention group) and centre-based cardiac rehabilitation (control group)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 72 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent * Patients after uncomplicated acute coronary syndrome of both sexes. * Patients completing a maximal or symptom-limited CPET without angina or electrical ischaemia. * Age equal to or less than 72 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal of informed consent * Advanced biological age. * Kidney failure (GFR \< 30ml/min/1.73 m2). * Liver failure (GOT \>2 times normal value). * Ejection fraction less than 50%. * Uncontrolled blood pressure (\>140/90 mmHg). * Uncontrolled heart failure. * Dissecting aortic aneurysm. * Uncontrolled ventricular tachycardia or other dangerous ventricular arrhythmias. * Aortic or mitral valve disease. * Recent systemic or pulmonary embolism. * Active or recent thrombophlebitis. * Acute infectious diseases. * Uncontrolled supraventricular arrhythmias or tachycardia. * Repeated or frequent ventricular ectopic activity. * Moderate pulmonary hypertension. * Ventricular aneurysm. * Uncontrolled diabetes, thyrotoxicosis, myxedema, * Conduction disorders such as: complete atrioventricular block. Left bundle branch block. * Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome. * Fixed rate pacing. * Severe anaemia. * Psychoneurotic disorders. * Neuromuscular, musculoskeletal and arthritic disorders that may limit activity. may limit activity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical activity derived from the International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ)10 monthsself-reported physical activity measured in metabolic equivalents (MET-min/week) Minimum value: 0, maximum value 19,278. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal heart rate10 monthsMaximal heart rate at the end of the exercise testing (bpm)
Exercise time10 monthsstress test duration (minutes)
Lipid parameters10 monthsTotal cholesterol (mg/dL), HDL cholesterol (mg/dL), LDL cholesterol (mg/dL), Non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dL), Triglycerides (mg/dL), Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-I ratio
Glycosylated haemoglobin10 monthsPercentage
Weight4 and 10 monthsKg
Waist circumference4 and 10 monthswaist circumference change (cm)
Visceral fat4 and 10 monthsPercentage
energy expenditure obtained from the International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ) questionaire10 monthsKcal/week
High level of effort obtained from the International Physical Activity questionnaire (IPAQ) questionaire10 monthsPercentage
Total score of Adherence to Mediterranean Diet obtained from the Prevention with Mediterranean Diet questionnaire (PREDIMED).10 monthsUnits. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 14. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
High level of Adherence to Mediterranean Diet obtained from the Prevention with Mediterranean Diet questionnaire (PREDIMED)10 monthspercentage. Minimum value: 0%, maximum value: 100%. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Maximal oxygen uptake10 monthsMaximal oxygen uptake during the final 30 seconds of the cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) (ml/kg/min )
Anxiety subscale of emotional distress obtained from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)10 monthsUnits. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 7. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Depression subscale of Emotional distress obtained from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)10 monthsUnits. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 7. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Global index of the health-related quality of life obtained from the European Quality of Life questionnaire (EuroQol-5D)10 monthsUnits. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 1. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Health status obtained from the European Quality of Life questionnaire (EuroQol-5D)10 monthsUnits. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
smoking cessation10 monthspercentage
Time to start the rehabilitation programme after discharge from hospital10 monthsdays
Returning to work10 monthsdays
Pulse wave velocity10 monthsm/s
User's experience from the System Usability Scale (SUS) score10 monthsUnits. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Cost-effectiveness analysis10 monthsnet cost divided by changes in health outcomes
Global score of emotional distress obtained from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)10 monthsUnits. Minimum value: 0, maximum value: 14. Lower scores mean a better outcome.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026