Skip to content

Low Dose ICG for Biliary Tract and Tumor Imaging

Low Dose ICG for Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Biliary Tract and Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04942665
Acronym
ICG
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-06-28
Start date
2021-09-15
Completion date
2023-04-01
Last updated
2023-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholecystitis, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Metastases

Keywords

Biliary Tract, Indocyanine Green (ICG), Tumors, Near-infrared Fluorescence

Brief summary

Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging after an intravenous injection of indocyanine green (ICG) allows for the intraoperative identification of liver anatomy. The investigators have new data that a much lower dose improves this visualization. Confirmation of this hypothesis would mean that ICG can be administered on the same day of surgery in order to augment real-time intraoperative visualization, thereby providing a safe, feasible, and cost-effective strategy for the surgical treatment of liver disease.

Detailed description

The investigators have a series of surgical cases in which the investigators have been able to achieve excellent intraoperative biliary visualization with a greatly decreased (50-200 fold lower) dose of ICG than the previously published dose. Furthermore, this decreased dose was visible in about 15-20 minutes from the time of injection with low liver background fluorescence, a significant improvement that would make its utilization in the operating room more practical. The investigators hypothesize that a lower dose will: 1) allow adequate visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree, including the cystic, common hepatic, and common bile ducts. Confirmation of hypotheses would mean that a lower dose of ICG can be administered on the same day of surgery in order to augment real-time intraoperative localization of the extrahepatic biliary tree, thereby providing a safe, feasible, and cost-effective strategy for the surgical treatment of liver disease. The investigators intend to test our hypothesis with the following specific aims: Aim 1: To compare the efficacy and utility of a low dose ICG (0.05 mg) protocol with a previously published dose (2.5 mg) in imaging the extrahepatic biliary tract.

Interventions

DRUGIndocyanine green

Low dose or standard dose ICG will be administered by the anesthesiologist as guided by the study coordinator at the beginning of the case, at two points during the operation (1- prior to the dissection of the biliary tract and 2- upon completion of the dissection and establishment of the critical view of safety).

DEVICEPINPOINT Endoscopic Fluorescence

The PINPOINT Endoscopic Fluorescence Imaging System (Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan) will be used. This device enables the surgeon to simultaneously see real-time, high-definition visible-range and NIR fluorescence videos and to superimpose them. It is currently approved by the FDA for intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Sponsors

Society of University Surgeons
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

To mask the investigator randomization will be done with envelopes for this study and the dose given to the patient prior to surgery with the investigator not being aware of the amount given.

Intervention model description

Adult patients scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic hepatic or biliary operation will be randomized to two groups 1) low dose (0.05 mg) or 2) standard dose (2.5 mg) of ICG preoperatively on the day of surgery. Patients with a history of adverse reactions or known allergy to ICG, iodine, or iodine dyes will be excluded.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing standard of care laparoscopic hepatic or biliary operations or Patients undergoing standard of care laparoscopic resection for hepatic tumors: hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic tumor

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a history of adverse reactions or known allergy to ICG, iodine, or iodine dyes and Pregnant and/or lactating patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative Assessment - Bile Duct-to-liver Fluorescence Intensity Ratiointraoperative, average of 2 hoursMeasurement is performed by dividing the fluorescence intensity signal of the common bile duct by that of the liver

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree - NIRFC Versus White Lightintraoperative, average of 2 hoursA qualitative assessment will be made based on the quality of the intraoperative visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = no improvement/identification not confirmed; 2 = marginally improved; 3 = sufficiently improved; 4 = well improved; 5 = greatly improved/exceeds expectations).
Quantitative Assessment - Bile Duct-to-background Fat Fluorescence Intensity Ratiointraoperative, average of 2 hoursMeasurement is performed by dividing the fluorescence intensity signal of the common bile duct by that of the background fat
Qualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)intraoperative, average of 2 hoursA qualitative assessment will be made based on the quality of the intraoperative visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = no improvement/identification not confirmed; 2 = marginally improved; 3 = sufficiently improved; 4 = well improved; 5 = greatly improved/exceeds expectations).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients undergoing a planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy were approached between September 2021 to August 2022 in pre-surgical clinic and consented for a randomized ICG dose administration.

Pre-assignment details

No enrolled patients were excluded from the study prior to group assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low Dose
Prior to surgery these patients will be given a ICG dose of 0.05 mg IV. Indocyanine green: Low dose or standard dose ICG will be administered by the anesthesiologist as guided by the study coordinator at the beginning of the case, at two points during the operation (1- prior to the dissection of the biliary tract and 2- upon completion of the dissection and establishment of the critical view of safety).
32
Standard Dose
Prior to surgery these patients will be given a ICG dose of 2.5 mg IV. Indocyanine green: Low dose or standard dose ICG will be administered by the anesthesiologist as guided by the study coordinator at the beginning of the case, at two points during the operation (1- prior to the dissection of the biliary tract and 2- upon completion of the dissection and establishment of the critical view of safety).
28
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalLow DoseStandard Dose
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants6 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
46 Participants26 Participants20 Participants
Age, Continuous57 years53 years60 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
8 participants6 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
46 participants26 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants32 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants23 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants9 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Quantitative Assessment - Bile Duct-to-liver Fluorescence Intensity Ratio

Measurement is performed by dividing the fluorescence intensity signal of the common bile duct by that of the liver

Time frame: intraoperative, average of 2 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Low DoseQuantitative Assessment - Bile Duct-to-liver Fluorescence Intensity Ratio2.7 ratio
Standard DoseQuantitative Assessment - Bile Duct-to-liver Fluorescence Intensity Ratio0.7 ratio
Secondary

Qualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)

A qualitative assessment will be made based on the quality of the intraoperative visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = no improvement/identification not confirmed; 2 = marginally improved; 3 = sufficiently improved; 4 = well improved; 5 = greatly improved/exceeds expectations).

Time frame: intraoperative, average of 2 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)Common Hepatic Duct3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Low DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)Cystic Duct3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Low DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)Common Bile Duct3.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Low DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)Aberrant Duct2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Standard DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)Aberrant Duct2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Standard DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)Common Hepatic Duct2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Standard DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)Common Bile Duct3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Standard DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree (Common Hepatic Duct, Cystic Duct, Common Bile Duct, Aberrant Ducts)Cystic Duct3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Qualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree - NIRFC Versus White Light

A qualitative assessment will be made based on the quality of the intraoperative visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = no improvement/identification not confirmed; 2 = marginally improved; 3 = sufficiently improved; 4 = well improved; 5 = greatly improved/exceeds expectations).

Time frame: intraoperative, average of 2 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree - NIRFC Versus White Light3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Standard DoseQualitative Assessment of Overall Intraoperative Visualization of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree - NIRFC Versus White Light3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Quantitative Assessment - Bile Duct-to-background Fat Fluorescence Intensity Ratio

Measurement is performed by dividing the fluorescence intensity signal of the common bile duct by that of the background fat

Time frame: intraoperative, average of 2 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Low DoseQuantitative Assessment - Bile Duct-to-background Fat Fluorescence Intensity Ratio6.1 ratio
Standard DoseQuantitative Assessment - Bile Duct-to-background Fat Fluorescence Intensity Ratio2.7 ratio

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026