Skip to content

A Study of TAK-660 in Surgical Procedures for People With Hemophilia A.

Adynovate Special Drug Use Result Survey (Perioperative Administration)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04941898
Enrollment
16
Registered
2021-06-28
Start date
2021-06-30
Completion date
2024-03-15
Last updated
2024-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemophilia A

Brief summary

This study is about a factor VIII medicine called Adynovate (TAK-660) used during surgery for people with hemophilia A who have low blood levels of factor VIII. The aims of this study are as follows: * To check for side effects from TAK-660. * To check how well TAK-660 controls bleeding when used routinely during surgery and other invasive procedures such as tooth extractions. The study sponsor will not be involved in how the participants are treated but will provide instructions on how the clinics will record what happens during the study. During the study, participants will receive infusions of TAK-660 during their hospital stay for surgery according to their clinic's standard practice. The study doctors will check for bleeds and side effects from TAK-660 from surgery until discharge.

Interventions

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-ylated full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII)

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency who received this drug during surgery or treatment after the start date of this survey.

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions Categorized as Inhibitor Development, Shock, or AnaphylaxisUp to 30 DaysAn adverse event (AE) is any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in a participant linked in time with the use of a pharmaceutical/ medicinal product. They are not limited to the events with clear causal relationship with treatment with concerned drug. Number of participants with adverse reactions categorized as inhibitor development, shock, or anaphylaxis was reported.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse EventsUp to 30 DaysA serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria.
Number of Participants With Adverse Drug ReactionUp to 30 DaysAn adverse event (AE) is any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in a participant linked in time with the use of a pharmaceutical/ medicinal product. They are not limited to the events with clear causal relationship with treatment with concerned drug. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Drug ReactionUp to 30 DaysA serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsUp to 30 DaysAn adverse event (AE) is any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in a participant linked in time with the use of a pharmaceutical/ medicinal product. They are not limited to the events with clear causal relationship with treatment with concerned drug. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion 1 Day After Surgery1 Day post-surgeryThe number of surgeries with each rating on hemostatic efficacy was counted and the percentage was reported. Postoperative hemostatic efficacy 1 day after surgery was assessed by following four rating and criteria. Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with study drug was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a nonhemophilic population, Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with study drug was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a nonhemophilic population, Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with study drug was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy, None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy.
Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion at Completion of Perioperative ManagementAt completion of perioperative management (approximately 30 days after surgery)Postoperative hemostatic efficacy at completion of perioperative management was assessed by following four rating and criteria. Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved after Day 1 with study drug was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population, Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved after Day 1 with study drug was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population, Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with study drug after Day 1 was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy, None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding after Day 1 that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy.
Intraoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionDay 1 (date of surgery)The number of surgeries with each rating on hemostatic efficacy was counted and the percentage was reported. Intraoperative hemostatic efficacy was assessed by following four rating and criteria. Excellent: Intraoperative blood loss was less than or equal to that expected for the type of procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population (≤100%)), Good: Intraoperative blood loss was up to 50% more than expected for the type: of procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population (101-150%), Fair: Intraoperative blood loss was more than 50% of that expected for the type of procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population (\>150%) None: Uncontrolled hemorrhage that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the survey at 10 investigative sites in Japan, from 30 June 2021 to 15 March 2024 .

Pre-assignment details

Participants with coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency who received Recombinant FVIII PEGylated (ADYNOVATE) for surgery/procedure were enrolled. Participants received ADYNOVATE Intravenous Infusion as part of a routine medical care.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion
Participants with coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency received Recombinant FVIII PEGylated (ADYNOVATE) Intravenous Infusion for surgery/procedure as part of a routine medical care.
15
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRecombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion
Age, Continuous41.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.13
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Drug Reaction

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in a participant linked in time with the use of a pharmaceutical/ medicinal product. They are not limited to the events with clear causal relationship with treatment with concerned drug. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.

Time frame: Up to 30 Days

Population: Safety Analysis Set, The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionNumber of Participants With Adverse Drug Reaction0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in a participant linked in time with the use of a pharmaceutical/ medicinal product. They are not limited to the events with clear causal relationship with treatment with concerned drug. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product.

Time frame: Up to 30 Days

Population: Safety Analysis Set, The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionNumber of Participants With Adverse Events2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions Categorized as Inhibitor Development, Shock, or Anaphylaxis

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward or undesirable medical occurrence in a participant linked in time with the use of a pharmaceutical/ medicinal product. They are not limited to the events with clear causal relationship with treatment with concerned drug. Number of participants with adverse reactions categorized as inhibitor development, shock, or anaphylaxis was reported.

Time frame: Up to 30 Days

Population: Safety Analysis Set, The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionNumber of Participants With Adverse Reactions Categorized as Inhibitor Development, Shock, or Anaphylaxis0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Drug Reaction

A serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.

Time frame: Up to 30 Days

Population: Safety Analysis Set, The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Drug Reaction0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

A serious AE is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria.

Time frame: Up to 30 Days

Population: Safety Analysis Set, The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the survey.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events1 Participants
Secondary

Intraoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion

The number of surgeries with each rating on hemostatic efficacy was counted and the percentage was reported. Intraoperative hemostatic efficacy was assessed by following four rating and criteria. Excellent: Intraoperative blood loss was less than or equal to that expected for the type of procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population (≤100%)), Good: Intraoperative blood loss was up to 50% more than expected for the type: of procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population (101-150%), Fair: Intraoperative blood loss was more than 50% of that expected for the type of procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population (\>150%) None: Uncontrolled hemorrhage that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy.

Time frame: Day 1 (date of surgery)

Population: Efficacy analysis set: all participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment without major protocol deviation. The number analyzed was the number of participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionIntraoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionExcellent93.3 percentage in total surgeries
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionIntraoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionGood6.7 percentage in total surgeries
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionIntraoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionFair0 percentage in total surgeries
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionIntraoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionPoor0 percentage in total surgeries
Secondary

Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion 1 Day After Surgery

The number of surgeries with each rating on hemostatic efficacy was counted and the percentage was reported. Postoperative hemostatic efficacy 1 day after surgery was assessed by following four rating and criteria. Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with study drug was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a nonhemophilic population, Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved with study drug was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a nonhemophilic population, Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with study drug was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy, None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy.

Time frame: 1 Day post-surgery

Population: Efficacy analysis set: all participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment without major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionPostoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion 1 Day After SurgeryExcellent56.3 percentage in total surgeries
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionPostoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion 1 Day After SurgeryGood37.5 percentage in total surgeries
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionPostoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion 1 Day After SurgeryFair6.3 percentage in total surgeries
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionPostoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion 1 Day After SurgeryPoor0 percentage in total surgeries
Secondary

Postoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion at Completion of Perioperative Management

Postoperative hemostatic efficacy at completion of perioperative management was assessed by following four rating and criteria. Excellent: Postoperative hemostasis achieved after Day 1 with study drug was as good or better than that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population, Good: Postoperative hemostasis achieved after Day 1 with study drug was probably as good as that expected for the type of surgical procedure performed in a non-hemophilic population, Fair: Postoperative hemostasis with study drug after Day 1 was clearly less than optimal for the type of procedure performed but was maintained without necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy, None: Participant experienced uncontrolled bleeding after Day 1 that was the result of inadequate therapeutic response despite proper dosing, necessitating rescue therapy with study drug or other replacement therapy.

Time frame: At completion of perioperative management (approximately 30 days after surgery)

Population: Efficacy analysis set: all participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment without major protocol deviation. The number analyzed was the number of participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionPostoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion at Completion of Perioperative ManagementExcellent50.0 percentage in total surgeries
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionPostoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion at Completion of Perioperative ManagementGood43.8 percentage in total surgeries
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionPostoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion at Completion of Perioperative ManagementFair6.3 percentage in total surgeries
Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous InfusionPostoperative Hemostatic Efficacy of Recombinant FVIII PEGylated Intravenous Infusion at Completion of Perioperative ManagementPoor0 percentage in total surgeries

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026