Skip to content

Exenatide for Treating Cocaine Use Disorder

Feasibility of Exenatide, a GLP-1R Agonist, for Treating Cocaine Use Disorder: A Case Series Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04941521
Enrollment
3
Registered
2021-06-28
Start date
2021-06-24
Completion date
2021-11-17
Last updated
2022-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cocaine Use Disorder

Keywords

Cocaine use, Exenatide, Cocaine treatment

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to collect information about whether exenatide (Bydureon) may be safe and helpful as a medication treatment for individuals who want to stop using cocaine. Although exenatide (Bydureon) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, it has not been approved by the FDA to treat cocaine use; therefore, it is called an investigational drug.

Detailed description

Cocaine use continues to be a significant public health problem with limited treatment options and no approved pharmacotherapies. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptors are located in brain areas important for reward and, as such, appear to play a significant role in modulating addictive-like behaviors and drug use (Eren-Yazicioglu et al. 2020). Extended-release exenatide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In preclinical studies, exenatide reduces cocaine-seeking and cocaine-taking behavior (Brunchmann et al. 2019). The effect of extended-release exenatide on cocaine use in patients with a cocaine use disorder (CUD) has not yet been investigated. A series of four case studies are being proposed to collect preliminary data on the feasibility, safety, and clinical effects of exenatide in treatment-seeking patients with CUD. The U.S. is facing a re-emergence of cocaine as an epidemic drug, indicated by increases in availability, use, and overdose deaths following a previous period of decline (Maxwell 2020). Although significant strides have been made in medication development for the treatment of cocaine use disorder (CUD), no FDA-approved pharmacotherapies are currently available. NIDA's current strategic plan prioritizes efforts to accelerate CUD medication development by rigorously testing novel molecular targets based on a translational research approach. Emerging evidence supports the potential clinical utility of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor stimulation for the treatment of substance use disorders, including CUD. GLP-1 is an incretin hormone that promotes insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells. Current evidence shows that GLP-1 receptors are widely expressed in areas of the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway where they regulate the rewarding value of food and drugs of abuse, including cocaine. Preclinical literature suggests that activation of GLP-1 receptors reduces the rewarding effects of cocaine and cocaine self-administration (e.g., Hernandez et al. 2018; Hernandez et al. 2019). In the human laboratory, acute cocaine administration decreases GLP-1 concentrations, with changes associated with subjective reinforcing responses to cocaine (feeling high, anxious) (Bouhlal et al. 2017). Thus, there is compelling evidence to hypothesize that exenatide treatment will decrease cocaine use in individuals with CUD. In preparation for conducting a full-scale efficacy trial, the goal of the current proposal is to collect preliminary feasibility, safety, and clinical data on the effects of exenatide in series of four case studies.

Interventions

Exenatide will be purchased commercially as Bydureon® for subcutaneous (SC) injection and administered at a dose of 2 mg once a week for a total of 6 weeks. Each single-dose, dual-chamber pen contains 0.65 mg of diluent and 2 mg of exenatide, which remains isolated until mixed.

BEHAVIORALDrug Counseling

Once weekly drug counseling sessions for cocaine use with trained masters-level therapists.

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Case series design run as a single-arm open-label pilot

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* between 18 and 60 years of age. * meet DSM-5 criteria for current cocaine use disorder as measured by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID). * have at least 1 cocaine-positive urine specimen (≥ 150 ng/mL) during intake. * be in acceptable health on the basis of interview, medical history and physical exam. * have hematology and chemistry laboratory tests that are within reference limits (±10%), with the following exception: pancreatic tests (lipase and amylase) must be within normal limits. * consent to use an acceptable method of birth control during study participation and for one month after discontinuation of the study medication. Non-hormonal methods of contraception are recommended, including barrier contraceptives (e.g., diaphragm, cervical cap, male condom) or intrauterine device (IUD). Steroid contraceptives if used with non-hormonal methods are acceptable. * be able to understand the consent form and provide written informed consent. * be able to provide the names of at least 2 persons who can generally locate their whereabouts.

Exclusion criteria

* current DSM-5 diagnosis for substance use disorder (of at least moderate severity) other than cocaine, marijuana, alcohol, or nicotine. * current alcohol use that meets for physiological dependence requiring detoxification or makes participation medically unsafe as determined by the medical director. * have a DSM-5 axis I psychiatric disorder, or anorexia nervosa, or neurological disease or disorder requiring ongoing treatment and/or making study participation unsafe (e.g., psychosis, dementia). * significant current suicidal or homicidal ideation. * Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (previously diagnosed or indicated by HbA1C level of ≥6.5%). * have medical conditions contraindicating exenatide pharmacotherapy (e.g., personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, severe gastrointestinal disease (severe gastroparesis), previous history of pancreatitis or risk of pancreatitis, creatinine clearance \<45 or end stage renal disease, previous medically adverse reaction to exenatide or other GLP-1 receptor agonists). * taking medications that could adversely interact with exenatide (e.g., oral or injectable blood glucose lowering medications). * having conditions of probation or parole requiring reports of drug use to officers of the court. * impending incarceration. * pregnant or nursing for female patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed TreatmentWeek 6Treatment completion will be assessed by attendance at the end-of-treatment timepoint.
Drug Safety as Assessed by Total Number of Adverse Events Reported During TreatmentFrom Week 1 to Week 6Adverse events (AEs) will be reported to study nurse during the course of treatment.
Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen ResultsFrom Week 1 to Week 6Urine drug screens were performed weekly. For a cocaine-negative urine drug screen result, benzoylecgonine levels must be under 300 ng/mL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility as Indicated by Overall Acceptability as Reported on the Satisfaction SurveyWeek 6The Satisfaction Survey includes a 9-point likert scale that ranges from 1 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater acceptability.
Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the WeekFrom Week 1 to Week 6Timeline Followback (TLFB) administered once weekly.
Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Reported a Reduction in Craving by Week 6 as Indicated by Cocaine Craving on the Brief Substance Craving ScaleFrom Week 0 to Week 6The brief substance craving scale (BSCS) is a 16-item, self-report instrument that assesses craving for cocaine and other substances of abuse over a 24 hour period. The domains of intensity, frequency, and duration are recorded on a five-point Likert scale. The range of scores for each domain is 0 to 4, and the total score is the sum of all three domains. The total score range is 0 to 12, and higher scores indicate higher craving (worse outcome.)
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants EnrolledWeek 0Enrollment will be assessed by the number of participants signing the informed consent.
Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Were Below the Clinical Range for Depression by Week 6 as Indicated by the Beck Depression InventoryWeek 6The Beck Depression Inventory score ranges from 0 to 63, with a higher score indicating greater depressive symptoms. The scores from each timepoint will be plotted as a trend line.
Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had an Increase in Positive Affect Symptoms by Week 6 as Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect ScheduleFrom Week 0 to Week 6The Positive/Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item questionnaire divided into 10 positive affect items and 10 negative affect items. The score for the positive affect items ranges from 10 to 50, with a higher score indicating higher levels of positive affect. The scores from each timepoint will be plotted as a trend line.
Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Negative Affect Symptoms Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect ScheduleFrom Week 0 to Week 6The Positive/Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item questionnaire divided into 10 positive affect items and 10 negative affect items. The score for the negative affect items ranges from 10 to 50, with a lower score indicating lower levels of negative affect. The scores from each timepoint will be plotted as a trend line.
Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Drug Demand by Week 6From Week 0 to Week 6Drug demand will be measured by the computerized Cocaine Purchasing Task (CPT). The CPT asks participants how much cocaine they would purchase at the beginning of a hypothetical day as the cost of cocaine increases from $0 to $1,000. The CPT simulates changes in price and consumption of drug in order to assess demand curves associated with drug consumption. The CPT will assess both cocaine reward value as well as motivation to consume cocaine.
Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Study Visits AttendedFrom Week 1 to Week 6There were 6 study visits planned.
Feasibility as Assessed by Retention as Indicated by Total Number of Completed Study VisitsFrom Week 1 to Week 6Retention will be assessed by the total number of completed study visits. A completed study visit is a visit in which the participant attended and received the study treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exenatide and Drug Counseling
Participants will receive once weekly exenatide injections and drug counseling sessions. Exenatide 2 mg \[Bydureon\]: Exenatide will be purchased commercially as Bydureon® for subcutaneous (SC) injection and administered at a dose of 2 mg once a week for a total of 6 weeks. Each single-dose, dual-chamber pen contains 0.65 mg of diluent and 2 mg of exenatide, which remains isolated until mixed. Drug Counseling: Once weekly drug counseling sessions for cocaine use with trained masters-level therapists.
3
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExenatide and Drug Counseling
Age, Continuous50.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.08
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
number of days of use of cocaine in the past 30 days18 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
number of days use of alcohol in the past 30 days8 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29
number of days use of marijuana in the past 30 days8.33 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21
Number of Years of Education13.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
number of years use of alcohol9.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.38
number of years use of cocaine17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.52
number of years use of Marijuana3.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.77
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
Tobacco Dependency assessed by the Fagerstrom Test
High Dependence
1 Participants
Tobacco Dependency assessed by the Fagerstrom Test
Low Dependence
0 Participants
Tobacco Dependency assessed by the Fagerstrom Test
Medium Dependence
1 Participants
Tobacco Dependency assessed by the Fagerstrom Test
Very High Dependence
0 Participants
Tobacco Dependency assessed by the Fagerstrom Test
Very Low Dependence
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen Results

Urine drug screens were performed weekly. For a cocaine-negative urine drug screen result, benzoylecgonine levels must be under 300 ng/mL.

Time frame: From Week 1 to Week 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen Resultsweek 33 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen Resultsweek 42 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen Resultsweek 52 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen Resultsweek 62 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen Resultsweek 13 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen Resultsweek 23 Participants
Primary

Drug Safety as Assessed by Total Number of Adverse Events Reported During Treatment

Adverse events (AEs) will be reported to study nurse during the course of treatment.

Time frame: From Week 1 to Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingDrug Safety as Assessed by Total Number of Adverse Events Reported During Treatment7 adverse events
Primary

Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed Treatment

Treatment completion will be assessed by attendance at the end-of-treatment timepoint.

Time frame: Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingFeasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed Treatment3 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Drug Demand by Week 6

Drug demand will be measured by the computerized Cocaine Purchasing Task (CPT). The CPT asks participants how much cocaine they would purchase at the beginning of a hypothetical day as the cost of cocaine increases from $0 to $1,000. The CPT simulates changes in price and consumption of drug in order to assess demand curves associated with drug consumption. The CPT will assess both cocaine reward value as well as motivation to consume cocaine.

Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Drug Demand by Week 61 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the Week

Timeline Followback (TLFB) administered once weekly.

Time frame: From Week 1 to Week 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the Weekweek 12 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the Weekweek 22 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the Weekweek 31 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the Weekweek 42 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the Weekweek 51 Participants
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the Weekweek 62 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Were Below the Clinical Range for Depression by Week 6 as Indicated by the Beck Depression Inventory

The Beck Depression Inventory score ranges from 0 to 63, with a higher score indicating greater depressive symptoms. The scores from each timepoint will be plotted as a trend line.

Time frame: Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Were Below the Clinical Range for Depression by Week 6 as Indicated by the Beck Depression Inventory3 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Negative Affect Symptoms Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect Schedule

The Positive/Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item questionnaire divided into 10 positive affect items and 10 negative affect items. The score for the negative affect items ranges from 10 to 50, with a lower score indicating lower levels of negative affect. The scores from each timepoint will be plotted as a trend line.

Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Negative Affect Symptoms Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect Schedule1 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had an Increase in Positive Affect Symptoms by Week 6 as Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect Schedule

The Positive/Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item questionnaire divided into 10 positive affect items and 10 negative affect items. The score for the positive affect items ranges from 10 to 50, with a higher score indicating higher levels of positive affect. The scores from each timepoint will be plotted as a trend line.

Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had an Increase in Positive Affect Symptoms by Week 6 as Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect Schedule1 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Reported a Reduction in Craving by Week 6 as Indicated by Cocaine Craving on the Brief Substance Craving Scale

The brief substance craving scale (BSCS) is a 16-item, self-report instrument that assesses craving for cocaine and other substances of abuse over a 24 hour period. The domains of intensity, frequency, and duration are recorded on a five-point Likert scale. The range of scores for each domain is 0 to 4, and the total score is the sum of all three domains. The total score range is 0 to 12, and higher scores indicate higher craving (worse outcome.)

Time frame: From Week 0 to Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingClinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Reported a Reduction in Craving by Week 6 as Indicated by Cocaine Craving on the Brief Substance Craving Scale2 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants Enrolled

Enrollment will be assessed by the number of participants signing the informed consent.

Time frame: Week 0

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Exenatide and Drug CounselingFeasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants Enrolled3 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Study Visits Attended

There were 6 study visits planned.

Time frame: From Week 1 to Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exenatide and Drug CounselingFeasibility as Assessed by Number of Study Visits Attended6 study visitsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Feasibility as Assessed by Retention as Indicated by Total Number of Completed Study Visits

Retention will be assessed by the total number of completed study visits. A completed study visit is a visit in which the participant attended and received the study treatment.

Time frame: From Week 1 to Week 6

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exenatide and Drug CounselingFeasibility as Assessed by Retention as Indicated by Total Number of Completed Study Visits6 completed study visitsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Feasibility as Indicated by Overall Acceptability as Reported on the Satisfaction Survey

The Satisfaction Survey includes a 9-point likert scale that ranges from 1 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater acceptability.

Time frame: Week 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Exenatide and Drug CounselingFeasibility as Indicated by Overall Acceptability as Reported on the Satisfaction Surveytreatment helpfulness7.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Exenatide and Drug CounselingFeasibility as Indicated by Overall Acceptability as Reported on the Satisfaction Surveytreatment usefulness6.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Exenatide and Drug CounselingFeasibility as Indicated by Overall Acceptability as Reported on the Satisfaction Surveylikelihood of treatment recommendation7.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Exenatide and Drug CounselingFeasibility as Indicated by Overall Acceptability as Reported on the Satisfaction Surveydesire to continue treatment7.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026