Skip to content

BurtVision™ for Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Survivors:

BurtVision™ for Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Survivors: a Comparison of Unimanual vs. Unimanual and Bimanual Tasks During Robot-assisted Arm Training

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04940403
Enrollment
38
Registered
2021-06-25
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

The focus of this study is to perform a preliminary assessment of the efficacy of the BurtVision system. While the Burt robotic-arm assists the patient's upper-limb in their movements, BurtVision will allow the patient to perform unimanual and bimanual activities while leveraging augmented reality games. The investigators will compare clinical outcomes when the BurtVisions ystem is used for training solely relying on unimanual tasks vs. when it is used for training relying on both unimanual and bimanual tasks.

Detailed description

The proposed study is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of using the BurtVistion on motor gains after robot-assisted upper-limb. Study participants (stroke survivors) will be recruited at the Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital - Boston. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the two different groups: unimanual or unimanual + bimanual arm therapy using a block-randomized allocation procedure to ensure important covariates, such as baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scores and chronicity, are balanced between groups.

Interventions

DEVICEBurt

18 one-hour sessions of unimanual upper-limb tasks during robot-assisted training with the Burt.

DEVICEBurt + BurtVision

18 one-hour sessions of combination of unimanual and bimanual upper-limb tasks during robot-assisted training with the BurtVision.

Sponsors

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessor will be blinded to the treatment allocation.

Intervention model description

Study participants will be randomized to either 1) manual robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation, and 2) unimanual+bimanual robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female, 18-80 years old; 2. Unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least 6 months and no more than 5 years prior to study enrollment; 3. Upper extremity hemiparesis as characterized by initial scores on upper limb subtest of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) between 12 and 40; 4. Some active pro-supination range of motion; 5. Some active metacarpal-phalangeal joint in the hemiparetic hand; 6. Intact cognitive function to understand the robotic therapy procedures (MMSE\>23 and able to follow 3 step command) during initial evaluation visit;

Exclusion criteria

1. Undergoing upper-limb rehabilitation therapy during the period of the study. 2. Severe spasticity (defined as a Modified Ashworth scale score of 3 or more) that would prevent safe use of the robotic system; 3. Visual impairments as assessed by the NIH Stroke Scale Visual Field subscale (only subjects with no visual loss will participate in the study); or hemispatial neglect that would impair the subject's ability to play the interactive games (as assessed with the line bisection test); 4. Severe proprioceptive deficits that impair the ability to process haptic or visual feedback, as assessed by physical examination during screening; 5. Communication impairments such aphasia that impair the subject's ability of providing feedback (as reported by a physician in his/her medical record); 6. Individuals with open wounds or recent fracture (\<3 months) in the upper extremity, fragile skin or active infection; 7. Upper-extremity orthopedic injuries or severe pain resulting in movement limitations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motor Activity Log- Amount of UseData will be collected at baseline and at 7-8 weeksSelf-reported measures of upper extremity activity performance in daily life (amount of use)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper-Extremity portionData will be collected at baseline and at 7-8 weeksAssessment of the severity of upper-limb motor impairments
Wolf Motor Function TestData will be collected at baseline and at 7-8 weeksAssessment of arm functional limitations
Stroke Impact ScaleData will be collected at baseline and at 7-8 weeksSelf-reported measure of quality of life after stroke
Motor Activity Log- Quality of UseData will be collected at baseline and at 7-8 weeksSelf-reported measures of upper extremity activity performance in daily life (quality of use)
Upper-Extremity AccelerometryData will be collected at baseline and at 7-8 weeksAmount of arm use over 72 hours recording with wrist-worn sensors

Contacts

CONTACTCatherine Adans-Dester, PhD
CADANS-DESTER@PARTNERS.ORG617-952-6321
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPaolo Bonato, PhD

Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026