Skip to content

Use of Rhythmic Auditory Cueing During Bilateral Training of the Upper Extremities in Stroke Patients

Use of Rhythmic Auditory Cueing During Bilateral Training of the Upper Extremities in Stroke Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04939493
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-06-25
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2021-06-15
Last updated
2021-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegia, Spastic

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of rhythmic auditory cueing with bilateral arm training on upper limb functions in stroke patients.

Detailed description

Arm and hand movement problems are major contributors to disability in patients after stroke. In fact, only 5% of adults regain full arm function after stroke, and 20% regain no functional use. Hence, alternative strategies are needed to reduce the long-term disability and functional impairment from upper limb hemiparesis. To solve problems concerning upper limb dysfunction related to stroke, various treatment methods have been used in several previous studies. Rhythmic auditory stimulation has been reported as an effective intervention for improving movement in the affected extremities of stroke patients. To the best of our knowledge, no mentioned previous studies evaluating the effect of rhythmic auditory cueing with bilateral arm training using functional exercises on upper extremity impairment in patients with stroke in Egypt are reported. So, this study aims to determine the effect of rhythmic auditory cueing with bilateral arm training on upper limb functions in patients with stroke.

Interventions

OTHERRhythmic Auditory Cueing

Patients will perform the same movement sequence in time with the metronome beat. The frequency of the rhythmic auditory stimulation will be matched to the participants preferred movement speed, which will be assessed prior to the start of the trial, and participants typically started moving after they had heard the metronome beat two to three times. Participants will be given sufficient practice trials to ensure full understanding before the actual recording of data, and will be given 3-minutes break between trials. On the 3rd and 5th week, the rhythm frequency was increased by 5%.

Training will consist of 20 minutes of bilateral arm training In each session, patients will be seated comfortably at a table in the following limb positions: ankles in neutral dorsiflexion, knees and hips placed at 90°, shoulders in 0° flexion, elbows in 60° flexion, and wrists in neutral position of flexion/extension

OTHERConventional physical therapy program

Scapular mobilization. Thoracic spine mobilization. Mechanical assisted (active and passive) exercises. Therapeutic positioning as weight bearing on the paretic arm. Opening and closing closed fist. Strengthening exercise. Stretching of spastic muscles.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Thirty patients with ischemic stroke from both sexes will be included. 2. Patients will have stroke for the first time. 3. The age of patients will range from 45 to 60 years. 4. Duration of illness will be from six months to eighteen months. 5. The degree of spasticity will ranged from 1 to 1 + grade according to the modified Ashworth scale. 6. Patients will have moderate arm motor impairment (between 30 and 49 scores) according to Fugl-Meyer (FM) arm section scale. 7. The affected upper extremity will be the dominant side. 8. Patients will be able to sit and maintain balance in a sitting position.

Exclusion criteria

* The patients will be excluded if they have: 1. Visual or auditory deficits. 2. Perceptual disorders. 3. Any surgical interventions in the upper extremities limiting the range of motion. 4. Aphasia or apraxia. 5. Musculoskeletal or neurological impairment of the unaffected upper extremity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing the change in Upper Extremity Motor PerformanceBaseline and 6 weeks post-interventionAssessment via using Upper Extremity Motor Performance scale. This scale has been shown to be valid and reliable, and it correlates well with inter joint upper extremity coordination. It has a maximum score of 66
Assessing the change in upper limb Motor FunctionBaseline and 6 weeks post-interventionAssessment via using Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) The final time score will be the median time required for all timed tasks executed. One hundred twenty seconds is the maximum time allowed for each task attempted Timing is carried out using a stopwatch.
Assessing the change in gross manual dexterityBaseline and 6 weeks post-interventionAssessment via using Box and Block Test Involves moving 1-inch cube blocks from a rectangular box container to another container, and the number of blocks moved by each hand in 60 seconds is determined using stop watch

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026