Skip to content

Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Investigation of the Effects of Noninvasive Neuromodulation in Patients With Acute Ischemic Infarction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04938076
Acronym
DAS
Enrollment
172
Registered
2021-06-24
Start date
2020-04-16
Completion date
2024-02-01
Last updated
2024-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Stroke

Brief summary

Non-invasive brain stimulation (tDCS) such as transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) has been reported to be effective in improving motor performance and safe in participants with cerebral infarction. However, few studies have been done in participants with acute cerebral infarction. In this study, the investigators want to see the effect of tDCS in acute cerebral infarction. the investigators perform tDCS in participants with acute ischemic stroke within 48 hours after stroke onset and the investigators measure motor weakness and function at early phase as well as at 3 months.

Detailed description

Cerebral infarction is a major cause of death, a disease that is socially and nationally burdensome, leaving disabilities and dementia behind. In participants with cerebral infarction, non-invasive brain stimulation (tDCS) such as transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) has been reported to be effective in improving motor performance and safe. However, few studies have been done in participants with acute cerebral infarction, and previous studies in participants with acute cerebral infarction have not verified the effect in mild cerebral infarction, and previous studies in acute cerebral infarction mainly stimulate lesions to anode. So in this study, the investigators want to see the effect of stimulating tDCS to both hemispheres in acute cerebral infarction against this backdrop. Study Objective: To see if tDCS is effective in improving motor paralysis in participants with acute cerebral infarction. Expected effectiveness: stability of tDCS has already been demonstrated in many studies. Since tDCS itself is a non-invasive treatment, if the efficacy of the tDCS prove to be effective in patients with acute cerebral infarction, it can be widely implemented without significant risk to many patients. Intervention : In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators perform tDCS in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 48 hours after stroke onset with sham control. Outcome : the investigators measure motor weakness and function at early phase as well as at 3 months.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial direct current stimulation

Transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortex

DEVICEsham control

sham control

Sponsors

The Catholic University of Korea
CollaboratorOTHER
Incheon St.Mary's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double blinded randomized control trial

Intervention model description

Double blinded randomized control trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ischemic stroke patients within 2 days stroke onset * 18-85 of age * corticospinal tract involvement stroke (primary motor cortex, corona radiata, internal capsule, midbrain crus cerebri, basis pontis, anterior medulla)

Exclusion criteria

* pre-stroke disability (defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) \>=2) * Intravenous r-tPA thrombolysis or EVT (endovascular thrombectomy) * history of epilepsy * advanced systemic disease or coexisting neurological/psychiatric disease * severe contact dermatitis or skin lesions interfering with the applying the electrode of tDCS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer (FM) motor scale, short format admissionThe Fugl-Meyer motor scale (FM) is widely used in clinical trials to quantify motor deficits after stroke. FM short form consists 12 items ranging from 0 (worst motor deficit) to 24 (no motor deficit).
NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale)at admissionNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) as a Neurologic. Assessment Tool in Stroke Patients ranging from 0 (no neurologic deficit) to 42 (severe neurologic deficit).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
modified Rankin scaleat 3 monthThe modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It has become the most widely used clinical outcome measure for stroke clinical trials.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026