Skip to content

Percutaneous Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture With Assistance of Intraoperative Ultrasound

Percutaneous Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture With Assistance of Intraoperative Ultrasound: Does it Improves the Results of Repair?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04935281
Enrollment
91
Registered
2021-06-22
Start date
2016-05-31
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2021-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Rupture of Achilles Tendon

Brief summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled study carried out between May 2016 and December 2020. It included 98 patients presented with acute rupture of Achilles tendon The patients were randomly distributed by closed envelop technique (49 in each group). Group A included those managed with the assistant of an intra-operative ultrasound. Group B included those done without ultrasound assistant

Detailed description

A preoperative prophylactic dose of antibiotic was given intravenously in the form of 2gm of cephalosporin one hour before operation. Under general or regional anesthesia, the patient laid in prone position without a tourniquet and both feet out of the table for easily mobilization of the ankle joint. In group A, an intraoperative ultrasound was done by a radiologist before the repair for identification the course of sural nerve and outline the medial and lateral edges of torn tendon. Then ultrasound was repeated after repair for confirmation of adequate contact of both stumps and satisfactory strength of the repair by visualization of the tendon with passive motion of the ankle. For patients in group B, the course of the sural nerve was determined according to the technique described by Blackmon et al. This technique depends on the leg length for location the point where the nerve crosses the lateral edge of the tendon. The medial and lateral borders of both stumps were outlined by palpation with identification of the gap in-between. The technique of repair was standardized for all patients in both groups. We used the technique described by Maffulli et al

Interventions

OTHERpercutaneous repair with an intraoperative assisted ultrasound

Under general or regional anesthesia, the patient laid in prone position In group A, an intraoperative ultrasound was done by a radiologist before the repair .

OTHERpercutaneous repair without an intraoperative assisted ultrasound

For patients in group B, the course of the sural nerve was determined according to the technique described by Blackmon et al.The medial and lateral borders of both stumps were outlined by palpation with identification of the gap in-between. We used the technique described byMaffulli et al with six stab incisions, one cm each. Four incisions were on medial and lateral edge of the proximal stump and the other two were around distal stump.

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age between 18 and 50 years * acute ( not more than two weeks) closed complete injury * injury of Achilles tendon in zone 2 (the area between 3 and 6 cm from the insertion) according to Langergran and Lindholm

Exclusion criteria

* incomplete injury * recurrent injury * associated fracture ankle or foot * previous history of local corticosteroids injection * patients with neurovascular problem (e.g. diabetic, autoimmune …etc), smoking, and alcoholics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
American Orthopedic Foot and An¬kle Society score4 yearsscore from 0 to 100 with highest score is better
single leg rising3 yearsability to stand on one leg
magnetic resonance imageone yearassessment of healing of torn tendon

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026