COVID-19 Treatment Using Methylene Blue and Photodynamic Therapy

SARS-CoV-2

COVID-19, photodynamic therapy, methylene blue

According to the epidemiological situation worldwide and the number of vaccinations made, there is little success in the fight against COVID-19. For many reasons, methylene blue is a promising drug for an active treatment against SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Since methylene blue can work as a photosensitizer, photodynamic therapy as an antiviral treatment has great potential in the treatment of COVID-19. This clinical study investigated the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 infected people treatment using methylene blue and the following photodynamic therapy on the base of the L.L. Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology (Department of Infectious Diseases №13) of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University.

This is a randomized, parallel, single masking clinical study 60 participants aged 18-90 with one positive COVID-19 quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction test and any severity of pneumonia (checked by computer tomography scans) were recruited. The experimental and control samples included 30 participants. Randomization was performed using the Random Number Table generated in STATISTICA Advanced 13.3. The physiological parameters including oxygen saturation, severity of pneumonia using computer tomography scans, heart rate, symptoms, and physical examination were collected. Participants in the experimental sample received methylthioninium chloride, Methylene Blue (SamaraMedProm, Russia, Registration number: MP-001834, 13.09.2012) orally in concentration 1 mg/kg in addition to the current therapy of the participant (e.g., azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, aminodihydrophthalazinedione sodium, levofloxacin, etc.), if any. After 3 hours, photodynamic therapy of the participant's chest by a 650 nm laser source (UFPh-675-01-BIOSPEC, BIOSPEC, Russia, Registration number: 2009/04648, 26.03.2009) with 18 J/cm\^2 energy dose was performed for 50 minutes. If the participant is in a critical state, inhalation by 0.2 mg Methylene Blue 10 ml water solution and following photodynamic therapy of pharynx and nasal cavity using 650 nm laser source with 36 J/cm\^2 energy dose during 10 minutes were performed. Participants in the control sample received only standard medical supportive therapy (e.g., azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, aminodihydrophthalazinedione sodium, levofloxacin, etc.). All next steps were performed for p participants from the experimental sample: 12 and 24 hours after photodynamic therapy, blood saturation were measured. 2 days after - participants will take a quantitative polymerase chain reaction test. 14 days after - computer tomography Aquilion One 640 (Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Registration Certificate FSZ 2008/01304, 02.07.2018) scans were performed. The participant's status scale (EQ-5D-3L, SHOCS-COVID score, validated) was checked on day 84. On 24 and 84 days all participants were checked whether they are alive or not by phone call. For participants in the control sample continuous check of blood saturation, quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction tests after 2 and 14 days of treatment, and computer tomography scans were performed. The primary outcome of this study is to calculate the percentage of participants with negative quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction test on SARS-CoV-2 by 2 days after methylene blue administration and photodynamic therapy. Experimental and control samples were comparable in gender, age, and severity of the disease. Z-test was used to analyze results on quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction tests within control and experimental samples. For each sample paired Student t-test was used to analyze individual saturation changes. Wilcoxon criterion was used for data on severity of pneumonia and status scale.

No related papers found yet.

Russia