Skip to content

Video Images About Decisions for Ethical Outcomes in the Emergency Department (VIDEO-ED)

Using the Emergency Department Visit to Promote Advance Care Planning

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04931797
Acronym
VIDEO-ED
Enrollment
900
Registered
2021-06-18
Start date
2022-04-25
Completion date
2026-05-30
Last updated
2025-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emergencies

Brief summary

A randomized controlled trial of a video decision aid in the Emergency Department Setting to improve advance care planning documentation.

Detailed description

A randomized controlled trial of a video decision aid in the Emergency Department setting shown to patients followed by a brief advance care planning discussion and then relay that discussion to the patient's primary care provider and/or admitting clinical team and look at rates of advance care planning documentation in the electronic health record over time. Primary outcome is advance care planning documentation in the EHR at 3 months.

Interventions

advance care planning video decision aid

BEHAVIORALcontrol arm ACP information sheet

control arm ACP information sheet

Sponsors

University of California, Davis
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Primary outcome will be obtained through natural language processing (NLP) from the EHR, in which the RA conducting the NLP will not know which arm of the study the patient was in.

Intervention model description

RCT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* anyone aged 65 and over or anyone aged over 50-64 with an indicator of serious illness

Exclusion criteria

* non english or spanish speakers those with a POLST legally blind medically non stable requiring ICU level care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EHR documentation of advance care planning3 monthsEHR documentation of advance care planning

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
concordance between stated and documented preferencesat 3 and 6 monthsconcordance between stated and documented preferences
ACP documentation in the EHRat 6 monthsACP documentation in the EHR
hospitalizationat 3 and 6 monthshospitalization
differential intervention effects of the ACP video intervention on patient ACP documentation based on race and ethnicityat baseline, 3 and 6 monthsWe will look at ACP documentation in the intervention and control arms to see if there are differential intervention effects based on race and ethnicity. We will look at the ACP documentation rate in Whites in both arms, and compare them to African Americans and Latinx populations. We will be able to see if the intervention had a greater or lesser effect on ACP rates in sub groups of our population by race and ethnicity.
quality of clinician ACP communication using an ACP quality communication surveyquality of communication at the time of the survey interview (baseline), and then at 3 and 6 monthsquality of ACP communication using an ACP quality communication survey
place of deathat 3 and 6 monthsplace of death
enrollment in hospiceat 3 and 6 monthsenrollment in hospice
ED visitsat 3 and 6 monthsED visits
patient reported conversations with health care providers and familyat 3 and 6 monthspatient reported conversations with health care providers and family
ICU daysat 3 and 6 monthsICU days
patient CPR and breathing machine preferencesat time of survey (baseline) and then after 3 and 6 monthswe will ask the patient whether or not they want CPR attempted and whether they would wish to be placed on a breathing machine
patient preferences for goals of careat time of survey (baseline) and then after 3 and 6 monthsWe will ask patient if they wish to receive life prolonging care, limited care or comfort care.
decisional certainty regarding decision making for ACP preferencesat baseline survey interviewwe will ask patients how certain they are about their decisions for the goals of care
patient knowledge of ACPat baseline survey interviewWe will ask patients knowledge questions about their understanding of advance care planning
patient confidence in health care delivery that is aligned with patient preferencesat time of survey (baseline) and then after 3 and 6 monthsWe will ask patients how confident they are in that they will receive the type of medical care they wish in their health care system
patient ACP engagement with ACP topicsat baseline survey interviewWe will ask patients how ready and engaged they are with the topic of advance care planning
mortalityat 3 and 6 monthsmortality

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 19, 2026