Skip to content

The Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment

The Impact of Oral Cannabis Administration and Co-Administration of Alcohol on Impairment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04931095
Enrollment
70
Registered
2021-06-18
Start date
2022-02-17
Completion date
2025-08-15
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Intoxication, Cannabis Intoxication

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the individual and interactive effects of oral cannabis and alcohol on subjective and behavioral measures of impairment.

Detailed description

This clinical laboratory study will be double-blind, placebo-controlled and will utilize a within-subjects experimental design. Participants will complete 7 outpatient drug administration sessions that will consist of self-administration of oral cannabis (0, 10 or 25mg THC) and alcohol (either placebo or active; BAC of 0.05 percent); participants will always receive both an alcohol drink (active or placebo) and dose of cannabis (active or placebo). Participants will also complete a condition in which they administer alcohol (BAC: 0.08 percent) with placebo cannabis, as a positive control. Primary outcomes include performance on field sobriety tests, cognitive and psychomotor impairment, subjective drug effects, and simulated driving performance. Blood concentrations of THC and THC metabolites will also be determined.

Interventions

DRUGCannabis

Cannabis will be orally ingested via a brownie

DRUGAlcohol

Alcohol will be orally ingested via a flavored drink

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blind (Participant, Outcomes Assessor), placebo controlled, and double-dummy

Intervention model description

All participants will complete all dose conditions (study arms) in a randomized order

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Have provided written informed consent 2. Be between the ages of 21 and 55 3. Be in good general health based on a physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and screening urine and blood tests 4. Not be pregnant or nursing (if female). All females must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the screening visit and a negative urine pregnancy test at each study visit. 5. Have a body mass index (BMI) in the range of 19 to 36 kg/m2 6. Blood pressure at Screening Visit does not exceed a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 150 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 mmHg 7. Have not donated blood in the prior 30 days. 8. Report at least 2 days of binge drinking in the past 90 days (greater than 4 or 5 drinks on a single occasion for women and men, respectively) 9. Report ≥ 1 use of cannabis in the past year 10. Provide negative urine test for illicit drug use (excluding THC) and negative breath alcohol test (0% BAC) at screening and before study sessions 11. Report at least 1 instance of simultaneous alcohol and use in the past year.

Exclusion criteria

1. Psychoactive drug use (aside from cannabis, nicotine, alcohol, or caffeine) in past month 2. Current use of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements/vitamins, or prescription medications that, in the opinion of the investigator or medical staff, will impact the participant's safety 3. History of or current evidence of significant medical condition 4. Evidence of current psychiatric condition \[(MINI for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-V)\] 5. Meet criteria for severe alcohol use disorder (MINI for DSM-V) 6. Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar) score \> 9 7. Been in treatment previously for alcohol or cannabis use disorder 8. Use of cannabis, on average, more than 2 times/week over past 3 months 9. Liver function tests more than 2x normal range 10. Enrollment in another clinical trial or receiving of any drug as part of research within past 30 days 11. Shipley vocabulary score \<18 (corresponds to 5th grade reading level).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Peak Change From Baseline DRUID Application Global Impairment Score7.5 hours, assessed at baseline (prior to drug administration) and again 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours after oral cannabis ingestion.Acute cognitive and behavioral impairment will be assessed with global impairment score (range 0-100) on the DRUID app (higher scores indicate greater impairment). Results are mean change from baseline.
Cumulative Score on Field Sobriety Tests7.5 hoursImpairment will be assessed using a battery of standard field sobriety tests including: the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN), the Walk and Turn, the One Leg Stand, and the Modified Romberg Balance. We will report the cumulative amount of clues observed across these tasks (out of a possible 0-22 clues). Higher scores indicate greater/worse impairment. These assessments were completed once after 7.5 hours.
Mean Peak Change From Baseline Scores on the Drug Effect Questionnaire (DEQ) - Feel Drug Effect7.5 hours, assessed at baseline (prior to drug administration) and again 0.5, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hours after oral cannabis ingestionThe DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "feel drug effects". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Results are mean change from baseline and a higher score indicates a more extreme/worse drug effect.
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Feel High7.5 hoursThe DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "feel high". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score greater "feel high" rating.
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Confidence to Drive (Change From Baseline)7.5 hoursThe DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "confidence to drive". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher scores indicate higher confidence to drive. Results expressed as change from baseline
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Willingness to Drive7.5 hoursThe DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "willingness to drive". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score indicates higher willingness to drive.
Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Sedative ScoreBaseline, 7.5 hoursThe BAES is used to assess sedative and stimulant subjective effects of alcohol. There are 7 sedative-related questionnaire items, each presented on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely), which are integrated to produce an overall sedative score (0-70). Higher scores indicating greater sedative effects of alcohol. Scores presented show the change from baseline to 7.5 hours.
Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) - Stimulant Score7.5 hoursThe BAES is used to assess sedative and stimulant subjective effects of alcohol. There are 7 stimulant-related questionnaire items, each presented on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely), which are integrated to produce an overall stimulant score (0-70). Higher scores indicating greater stimulant effects of alcohol.
Subjective High Assessment Scale (SHAS)7.5 hoursFor the SHAS, participants are presented with 13 questionnaire items, displayed on a visual analog scale anchored from 0 (normal) to 10 (extremely), which assess subjective effects of alcohol. These items are integrated to produce an overall SHAS score (0-130). Higher score indicates greater effects of alcohol.
Driving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP)Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursThe STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. SDLP (measured in cm) was calculated across all drives to get a composite index of lateral control and reported as peak change from baseline. SDLP is the gold standard of quantifying the magnitude of driving impairment from drugs and alcohol and has excellent predictive validity to actual driving. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher magnitude of driving impairment.
Driving Performance as Assessed by Composite Drive ScoreBaseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursDriving impairment will be assessed via a composite drive score. The composite drive score is derived by integrating various driving outcomes (see primary and secondary driving outcomes). Higher z-score indicates worse performance. The score is on a z-score scale, meaning a score of 1 equates to 1 standard deviation outside of the participants' mean baseline performance and a Z-score of 0 represents the mean baseline performance. This was calculated across all drives and reported as peak change from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Driving Performance as Assessed by Standard Deviation of Speed (SDSP)Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursThe STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. SDSP will be calculated across all drives to get a composite index of the variability in speed (measured in MPH) and is reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher magnitude of driving impairment.
Total Run LengthBaseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursThe STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Total run length will be calculated across all drives and measured as peak change from baseline score (in seconds). Higher scores represent higher magnitude of driving impairment.
Driving Performance (Number of Speed Exceedances)Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursThe STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get a cumulative number of times participants exceed the allowable speed limit and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher numbers of speed exceedances.
Driving Performance (Number of Accidents)Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursThe STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get a cumulative number of accidents (including car collisions, pedestrians hit, etc.) and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher numbers of accidents.
Driving Performance (Total Rule Violations)Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursThe STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get a cumulative number of total rule violations (including number of missed stop signs, illegal turns, speed exceedances, etc.) and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent higher numbers of rule violations. All scores reported are relative to baseline, thus negative values represent a lower number of rule violations than at baseline.
Driving Performance (Distance to Lead Vehicles)Baseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursThe STISIM Drive® M4000-R Console system will be used to assess driving performance, a state-of-the-art technology that has been independently validated to reflect real-world driving conditions. Driving performance will be calculated across all drives to get the mean distance (in meters) maintained to lead vehicles during car-following segments and reported as peak change from baseline. Scores range from 0 to no upper limit. Higher scores represent greater distance maintained to lead vehicles. All scores reported are relative to baseline, thus negative values represent a shorter distance maintained than at baseline.
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus TestBaseline, 7.5 hoursImpairment will be assessed using performance on the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN). Total score will be recorded (out of possible 0-6 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Walk and Turn TestBaseline, 7.5 hoursImpairment will be assessed using performance on the the Walk and Turn. Total score will be recorded (out of a possible 0-8 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on One Leg StandBaseline, 7.5 hoursImpairment will be assessed using performance on the One Leg Stand test. Total score will be recorded (out of a possible 0-4 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported
Change in Field Sobriety Test - Score on Modified Romberg BalanceBaseline, 7.5 hoursImpairment will be assessed using performance on the Modified Romberg Balance test. Total score will be recorded (out of a possible 0-4 clues) with higher scores indicating higher impairment. Assessed at baseline and 7.5 hours, change from baseline to 7.5 hours reported
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Like Drug Effect7.5 hoursThe DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "like drug effect". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score indicating greater "liked drug effect" rating.
Drug Effect Questionnaire - Dislike Drug Effect7.5 hoursThe DEQ will be used to obtain subjective ratings of "dislike drug effect". Score range from 0 (none) to 100 (extreme) using a 100mm line anchored with none/extreme designation. Higher score indicating greater "dislike drug effect" rating.
Pharmacokinetics - CMax for THC and THC MetabolitesBaseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursWhole blood concentrations of THC, 11-OH-THC, and THCCOOH will be measured using quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis. The maximum concentration (Cmax) is determined as the highest concentration reached for each individual (ng/mL) across all timepoints.
Pharmacokinetics - AUC for THC and THC MetabolitesBaseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursWhole blood concentrations of THC, 11-OH-THC, and THCCOOH will be measured using quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) is calculated cumulative across all timepoints.
Pharmacokinetics - CMax for AlcoholBaseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursBAC will be measured using the Alco-Sensor IV. Measuring BAC is needed to confirm that participants reached the targeted BAC for a given session and to confirm adherence to pre-session alcohol abstinence requirements (g/210L). The maximum concentration (Cmax) is determined as the highest concentration reached for each individual (ng/mL) across all timepoints.
Pharmacokinetics - AUC for AlcoholBaseline, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 hoursWhole blood concentrations of Alcohol will be measured using quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) is calculated cumulative across all timepoints.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTory Spindle, PhD

Johns Hopkins University

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

70 participants were enrolled (consented) and 25 were considered eligible and went on to complete all study procedures.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants
Age, Continuous25.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 250 / 253 / 250 / 254 / 250 / 250 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 4, 2026