Skip to content

Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mulligan Technique for Treating Neck Pain in Breast Feeding Women

Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mulligan Technique for Treating Neck Pain in Breast Feeding Women

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04930575
Enrollment
32
Registered
2021-06-18
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2021-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain, Breast Feeding

Brief summary

The purpose of this study will determine the effect of muscle energy technique versus mulligan technique on neck pain in breastfeeding women.

Detailed description

Conservative treatments used to manage neck pain are numerous and include usual medical care ( face to face interview, education, reassurance, medication, ergonomic and stay active advice), various forms of exercise, massage, and acupuncture among others, but a lack of evidence regarding their relative efficacy was found. More research is needed to determine specific exercise programs that can decrease neck pain in breastfeeding women. So, this study will be conducted to determine clinical evidence of the effectiveness of muscle energy technique versus mulligan technique on neck pain, which constituted a great problem facing the mother during the breastfeeding period.

Interventions

OTHERMuscle Energy Technique

A biomechanical correction approach can lead to the normalization of spinal curvatures and a decrease in the compressional and tensional stress on joints and soft tissues of the body.

* The patient will be in a supportive low back chair, thus cervical region will be in a vertical position (Weight-bearing position) with the therapist position will be behind the patient. * Then the therapist will move the spinous process up in the direction that must follow the apophyseal joint plane under treatment, that is, toward the eye ball. While sustaining this pain-free accessory glide, the patient will be instructed to actively perform the physiological movement gradually until the end ROM with over pressure at the end of the range.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients will be examined by a physician before the study and will be chosen according to the following criteria: * All patients will be in the breastfeeding period at least 6 weeks after delivery. * All patients will be clinically diagnosed with neck pain (with no neurological or rheumatological problem). * Their ages will range from 25-35years. * Their BMI will be less than 30 kg/m². * Their parity will not be more than 3 times.

Exclusion criteria

* The patients will be excluded if they have any of the followings: 1. Any contraindication to spinal mobilization (e.g., inflammation, infection, advanced degeneration, congenital malformation, trauma, cerebrovascular abnormalities). 2. Positive neurological examination (presence of positive motor reflex, or sensory abnormalities indicating spinal root compression). 3. Cervical spine surgery or stenosis, metabolic or systemic disorder, or cancer. 4. Associated pathology of the upper cervical region or upper limb that may cause overlapping with the clinical finding as referred pain from the costotransverse joint, rotator cuff tendonitis, and cervical rib syndrome.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessing the change in Cervical pain levelBaseline and 4 weeks post-interventionAssessment via using Visual Analogue Scale that continuous data analysis and uses a 10 cm long with 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst pain). Patient will be asked to place a mark along the line to denote their level of pain.
Assessing the change in Functional disabilityBaseline and 4 weeks post-interventionAssessment via using Neck pain disability index questionnaire consists of 10 items each of them is scored from 0 to 5. The total maximum score is therefore 50.The original report provided scoring interval for interpretation, as; (0-4) = no disability, (5-14) mild, (15-24) moderate, (25-34) sever, (above34) complete disability.
Assessing the change in Cervical Range Of MotionBaseline and 4 weeks post-interventionAssessment via using Digital goniometer is valid and has good reliability for measuring cervical spine range of motion.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactHeba Elbasiony, Physical Therapist
mheba7033@gmail.com+201007065666

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026