Skip to content

Oxbryta® Product Registry An Observational Study Designed to Evaluate the Effect of Oxbryta in Individuals With SCD

An Open Label, Observational, Prospective Registry of Participants With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Treated With Oxbryta® (Voxelotor)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04930445
Acronym
PROSPECT
Enrollment
265
Registered
2021-06-18
Start date
2022-02-04
Completion date
2024-10-10
Last updated
2025-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

Registry Sickle Cell Disease

Brief summary

This registry is an observational study designed to evaluate the effect of Oxbryta in individuals with SCD in a real-world setting.

Detailed description

The study will be conducted at approximately 45 sites in the United States. This registry is an observational study to evaluate the effects of Oxbryta in individuals with SCD. Any participant who is currently taking Oxbryta, or has been prescribed and will initiate treatment with Oxbryta, is eligible to participate. Eligible participants will receive treatment with Oxbryta as prescribed by their physician, as part of their usual care. Participants will be treated and evaluated per standard of care (SOC) and at the physician's discretion. This study will collect data that are recorded in the participants' medical records and other secondary data sources. Study data will be collected at regular intervals and entered in case report forms (CRFs) via an electronic data capture (EDC) system by the study staff. Participants will be considered to be on study for up to 5 years after their first dose of Oxbryta treatment, or until they withdraw their consent to participate, or are discontinued from the study. Treatment, including interruptions and restarting treatment, will continue at the discretion of the treating physician, and there are no pre-defined treatment requirements. Participants may receive any additional medications prescribed by their treating physician, or have any medical interventions that are deemed appropriate by the treating physician or study doctor. The participant or treating physician may discontinue Oxbryta at any time. Participants who discontinue treatment with Oxbryta earlier than 5 years will continue to be followed on study to collect clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes for up to 5 years after their first dose of Oxbryta treatment. Participant safety and tolerability will be assessed throughout the study data collection period by the study doctor and reported to the Sponsor.

Interventions

DRUGOxbryta® (voxelotor) 500mg Tablets

Participants will receive treatment with Oxbryta as prescribed by their physician, as part of their usual care. Participants will be treated and evaluated per standard of care (SOC) and at the physician's discretion. There are no pre-defined treatment requirements.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants who meet all the following criteria will be eligible for enrollment: 1. Willing and able to provide written informed consent (aged ≥ 18 years), parental/ guardian consent and participant assent (aged ≥ 12 to \<18 years) per local regulations, or pediatric participants (aged 4 to \<12 years) with parental/guardian consent per Institutional Review Board (IRB) policy and requirements, consistent with ICH guidelines 2. Male or female participants with documented diagnosis of sickle cell disease (all genotypes) 3. Undergoing treatment with Oxbryta according to the Oxbryta USPI

Exclusion criteria

* Participants meeting any of the following criteria will not be eligible for study enrollment: 1. Current participation in an investigation clinical trial or expanded access program, in which the participant may be receiving voxelotor treatment. 2. Medical, psychological, or behavioral condition that, in the opinion of the study doctor, would confound or interfere with evaluation of safety and/or effectiveness of the study drug, prevent compliance with the study protocol; preclude informed consent; or render the participant unable/unlikely to comply with the study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Positive Pregnancy Test and Fertility ComplicationsFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment up to end of study (up to Month 60)Number of participants with positive pregnancy test and fertility complications were reported in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60PGIC was a single question that reflected a participant's or caregiver's belief about the effectiveness of treatment with Oxbryta on a 7-point scale depicting a participant's rating of overall improvement. Participants/caregivers rated their change as very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse.
Number of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60CGIC was a brief, stand-alone assessment of the clinician's view of the participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating Oxbryta. The CGI provided an overall clinician-determined summary measure that took into account all available information, including a knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. Participants rated their change as very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse, or not assessed.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) According to SeverityFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment up to end of study (up to Month 60)An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the following criteria - resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect and other important medical events. Severity was classified using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 5.0, where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe. Mild - SAEs does not interfere with participant's usual function b) moderate - SAEs interferes to some extent with participant's usual function c) severe - SAEs interferes significantly with participant's usual function.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeverityFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment up to end of study (up to Month 60)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Severity was classified using CTCAE, version 5.0, where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe. AEs are classified according to the severity in 3 categories a) mild - AEs does not interfere with participant's usual function b) moderate - AEs interferes to some extent with participant's usual function c) severe - AEs interferes significantly with participant's usual function. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Dose Modification or Discontinuation of OxbrytaFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment up to end of study (up to Month 60)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Number of participants with AEs leading to dose modification or discontinuation of Oxbryta were reported in this outcome measure.
Change in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-OxbrytaThe pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Change in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-OxbrytaThe pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Change in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-OxbrytaThe pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Change in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-OxbrytaThe pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used. Abbreviations used: overall number of participants analyzed=N and Number analyzed= n
Change in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-OxbrytaThe pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Change in Iron Overload as Measured by T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) up to 60 months post-OxbrytaThe pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Change in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-OxbrytaThe pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Change in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 months post-OxbrytaThe pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Number of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-OxbrytaHemoglobinuria was defined as urine dipstick results positive for blood +1 or greater and \<=2 red blood cells (RBC) by high power field. Number of participants according to hemoglobinuria results (none/negative, trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, other: large, moderate, small, small=0-3, hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin \[HPF\], missing) was reported in this outcome measure. Small corresponded to trace or 1+ on dipstick, medium indicated 2+, large indicated 3+ or higher on dipstick. The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Change in Serum Cystatin C Results From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 30 Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 months post-OxbrytaThe pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Number of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-OxbrytaEstimated GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Number of participants according to estimated GFR results (stage 1 \[G1\] - GFR \>=90 milliliter/minute \[mL/min\] per 1.73 square meters \[m\^2\], stage 2 \[G2\] - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2, stage 3a \[G3a\] - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2, stage 3b \[G3b\] - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2, stage 4 \[G4\] - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2, stage 5 \[G5\] - GFR \< 15 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 or treatment by dialysis, missing) was reported descriptively in this outcome measure. Stages 1 and 2 indicate mild damage, while stages 3 to 5 reflected progressive severity, leading to potential renal failure. The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.
Number of Participants With SCD ComplicationsFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)SCD complications included acute pain crisis, acute chest syndrome (ACS), priapism, stroke, chronic or end stage kidney disease iron overload, leg ulcers, cardiac malfunction and pulmonary hypertension (PH) and RBC transfusions.
Number of Participants With Treatment Initiation or Modification of SCD-related MedicationsFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)Number of participants with treatment initiation or modification of SCD related medications is reported in this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) TransfusionsFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)Number of participants with RBC transfusions is reported in this outcome measure.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Number of Emergency Department (ED) Visits From Pre-Oxbryta TreatmentFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)ED visits were planned to be analyzed in this outcome measure.
Change in Number of Hospitalizations From Pre-Oxbryta TreatmentFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)Number of hospitalizations were planned to be analyzed.
Change in Home Oxygen Supplementation From Pre-Oxbryta TreatmentFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)
Number of Participants With Renal DialysisFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)
Change in Number of Outpatient Visits From Pre-Oxbryta TreatmentFrom date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)Outpatient visits (including infusion center, acute care, or telemedicine visit) were planned to be analyzed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 24 sites in the United States. The study was terminated as emerging clinical data indicated that the risk profile of Oxbryta (voxelotor) in participants with sickle cell disease (SCD) exceeded the benefits observed in previously generated global research and required further assessment. Screen failure was defined as participants who did not start or restart Oxbryta within six months of informed consent.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 265 participants with SCD (all genotypes) aged greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 years were enrolled in this study. Data was collected from participants medical records and other secondary data sources such as insurance and pharmacy claims. Participants were followed for up to 5 years after their first dose of Oxbryta treatment (irrespective of how long participants were on Oxbryta when they were enrolled in the study), or until they withdrew consent or were discontinued from study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Participants with SCD who were treated with Oxbryta in study C5341018 (NCT04930328) or were prescribed Oxbryta by their physician as part of their usual care were included.
265
Total265

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event7
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyOther2
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudyScreen Failure8
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor245

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous32.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.78
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
240 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
246 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
154 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
111 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 260
other
Total, other adverse events
185 / 260
serious
Total, serious adverse events
150 / 260

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta

The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta-15.6 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 188.54
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta1.5 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 134.05
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta-4.1 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 137.59
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta2.4 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 130.76
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta-17.8 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 175.27
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta31.4 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 242.25
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta0.1 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 134.67
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta-15.3 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 228.15
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta2.7 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 142.52
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta4.4 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 119.59
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta3.3 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 140.03
All ParticipantsChange in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta21.7 10^9 cells/LiterStandard Deviation 93.55
Primary

Change in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta

The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta80.3 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 164.48
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta67.5 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 451.66
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta-42.1 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 137.7
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta59.6 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 129.88
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta-32.1 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 158.67
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta125.2 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 330.7
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta7.7 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 178.23
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta14.4 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 130.58
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta38.2 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 96.87
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta273.3 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 599.99
All ParticipantsChange in Albumin Creatinine Ratio (ACR) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 54 Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta873.3 Milligram per gramStandard Deviation 1488.6
Primary

Change in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta

The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used. Abbreviations used: overall number of participants analyzed=N and Number analyzed= n

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of inform consent date). Here, 'N'=number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n'=participants evaluable for specified time-points. Indirect bilirubin data for month 54 and 60 was not collected as data collection was not mandatory for laboratory parameters since it is a non-interventional study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.22
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.62
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct0.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.57
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct-0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.46
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct0.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.35
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.57
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.01
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct0.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.81
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct-0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.31
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct-0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.37
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct-0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.28
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta: Direct-0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.37
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect-0.4 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.19
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect-0.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.28
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect0.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.23
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect-0.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.22
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect0.4 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.64
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect0.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.23
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect0.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.4
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect0.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.97
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect-0.4 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.78
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta: Indirect-0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.45
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.71
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.97
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.76
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.4 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.66
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.24
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.4 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.27
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.1
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.48
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.9
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.8 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.59
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.6 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 2.56
All ParticipantsChange in Bilirubin (Total, Direct and Indirect) Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta: Total-0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.33
Primary

Change in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta

The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta0.5 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.33
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta0.6 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.47
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta0.5 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.45
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta0.6 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.36
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta0.7 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.35
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta0.6 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.46
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta0.5 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.62
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta0.6 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.62
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta0.4 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.48
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta0.7 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.47
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta0.1 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.68
All ParticipantsChange in Hemoglobin From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta-0.2 Grams per deciliter (g/dL)Standard Deviation 1.36
Primary

Change in Iron Overload as Measured by T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta

The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) up to 60 months post-Oxbryta

Population: No data was not collected for this outcome measure as the information regarding iron overload as measured by T2-weighted MRI was not available in the medical record for any of the participants.

Primary

Change in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta

The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta74.0 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 1696.32
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta105.2 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 1995.71
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta-60.7 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 2200.7
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta136.9 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 1614.56
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta148.0 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 1973.6
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta94.0 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 2111.95
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta-248.1 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 1761.49
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta-220.5 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 1765.71
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta667.5 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 2577.61
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta896.7 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 3142.23
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta1672.8 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 3975.5
All ParticipantsChange in Iron Overload (Ferritin Levels) From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta4512.5 Micrograms per literStandard Deviation 5500.9
Primary

Change in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta

The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta-0.9 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 5.5
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta-1.1 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 6.01
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta-1.1 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 5.97
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta-1.2 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 6.34
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta-1.6 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 6.69
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta-0.7 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 6.32
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta-1.0 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 6.92
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta-1.3 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 7.04
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta-0.2 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 7.45
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta0.2 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 6.7
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta-0.3 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 6.59
All ParticipantsChange in Percent Reticulocyte Count From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta1.9 Percentage of reticulocytesStandard Deviation 3.84
Primary

Change in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta

The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.6
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta0.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.37
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta0.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.46
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta0.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.37
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.43
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.51
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta0.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.6
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta0.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.92
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta0.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.04
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.52
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta0.4 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 1.17
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Creatinine Level From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 60 Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta0.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Deviation 0.25
Primary

Change in Serum Cystatin C Results From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 30 Post-Oxbryta

The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Cystatin C Results From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 30 Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta-0.1 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.07
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Cystatin C Results From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 30 Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta0.1 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Cystatin C Results From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 30 Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta-0.1 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.07
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Cystatin C Results From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 30 Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta0.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.07
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Cystatin C Results From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 30 Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta-0.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.07
All ParticipantsChange in Serum Cystatin C Results From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment (Baseline) Through Month 30 Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta0.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.11
Primary

Number of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta

Estimated GFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Number of participants according to estimated GFR results (stage 1 \[G1\] - GFR \>=90 milliliter/minute \[mL/min\] per 1.73 square meters \[m\^2\], stage 2 \[G2\] - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2, stage 3a \[G3a\] - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2, stage 3b \[G3b\] - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2, stage 4 \[G4\] - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2, stage 5 \[G5\] - GFR \< 15 mL/min per 1.73 m\^2 or treatment by dialysis, missing) was reported descriptively in this outcome measure. Stages 1 and 2 indicate mild damage, while stages 3 to 5 reflected progressive severity, leading to potential renal failure. The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date).

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^263 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^224 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^247 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^221 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^22 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^28 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^22 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaMissing164 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^24 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaMissing189 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^251 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^217 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^22 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaMissing187 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^244 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^221 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^22 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaMissing193 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^250 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^222 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^22 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^22 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaMissing186 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^260 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^229 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^25 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^20 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaMissing165 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^255 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^222 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^22 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaMissing180 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^253 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^221 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^24 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaMissing184 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^239 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^215 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^24 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaMissing203 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^242 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^212 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^25 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^20 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^26 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaMissing202 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^233 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^210 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^24 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^25 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaMissing212 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^223 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^20 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^23 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaMissing228 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaG1 - GFR >=90 mL/min per 1.73 m^27 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaG2 - GFR 60 to 89 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaG3a - GFR 45 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m^21 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaG3b - GFR 30 to 44 mL/min per 1.73 m^20 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaG4 - GFR 15 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m^20 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaG5 - GFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 or treatment by dialysis0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaMissing256 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta

Hemoglobinuria was defined as urine dipstick results positive for blood +1 or greater and \<=2 red blood cells (RBC) by high power field. Number of participants according to hemoglobinuria results (none/negative, trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, other: large, moderate, small, small=0-3, hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin \[HPF\], missing) was reported in this outcome measure. Small corresponded to trace or 1+ on dipstick, medium indicated 2+, large indicated 3+ or higher on dipstick. The pre-Oxbryta (baseline) value was the latest measurement on or prior to the first dose of Oxbryta. Post-Oxbryta value was the measurement for multiple assessments at the same specific visit, the average was used.

Time frame: Pre-Oxbryta (baseline) 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months post-Oxbryta

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date).

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaTrace3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta1+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta2+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaMissing254 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaTrace2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative18 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta2+1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaTrace4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta1+3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta2+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaMissing239 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta1+1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta2+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaMissing246 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative13 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaTrace1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta1+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaTrace4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta1+1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta2+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaNone/Negative22 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaTrace7 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta1+3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta2+6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaOther: Large3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaOther: Moderate1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaOther: Small0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-OxbrytaPre-OxbrytaMissing223 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative7 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaTrace4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta1+2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta2+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta3 months Post-OxbrytaMissing251 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative12 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaTrace0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta1+2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta2+3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta6 months Post-OxbrytaMissing247 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta9 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative8 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative11 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta1+1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-Oxbryta2+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta12 months Post-OxbrytaMissing250 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaTrace6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-Oxbryta1+2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta18 months Post-OxbrytaMissing236 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative17 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta24 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative16 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaTrace2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta30 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta2+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-Oxbryta3+2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta36 months Post-OxbrytaMissing247 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative12 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta42 months Post-OxbrytaMissing245 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative12 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaTrace2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta1+1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta2+2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-Oxbryta3+1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta48 months Post-OxbrytaMissing247 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative8 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaTrace2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta1+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta2+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta54 months Post-OxbrytaMissing253 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaNone/Negative1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaTrace0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta1+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta2+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-Oxbryta3+0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Large0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Moderate0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaOther: Small- 0-3 HPF0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Hemoglobinuria Results Post-Oxbryta60 months Post-OxbrytaMissing264 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60

CGIC was a brief, stand-alone assessment of the clinician's view of the participant's global functioning prior to and after initiating Oxbryta. The CGI provided an overall clinician-determined summary measure that took into account all available information, including a knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. Participants rated their change as very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse, or not assessed.

Time frame: Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Much improved12 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Not assessed1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Very much improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Much improved7 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Minimally improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18No change9 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Minimally worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Not assessed0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Very much improved3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Much improved13 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Minimally improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24No change2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Minimally worse2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Not assessed1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Very much improved2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Much improved2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Minimally improved9 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30No change5 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Minimally worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Not assessed0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Very much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Much improved8 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Minimally improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36No change4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Very much worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Not assessed0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Very much improved0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Minimally improved10 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42No change8 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Not assessed0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Very much improved2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Minimally improved10 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48No change6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Minimally worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Not assessed1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Very much improved0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Much improved0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Minimally improved2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54No change4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Not assessed0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Very much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Minimally improved0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60No change0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Not assessed0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Very much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Minimally improved0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3No change2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Not assessed0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Very much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Minimally improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6No change5 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Minimally worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Not assessed0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Very much improved3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Much improved4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Minimally improved7 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9No change5 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Not assessed0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Very much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Much improved4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Minimally improved7 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12No change7 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60

PGIC was a single question that reflected a participant's or caregiver's belief about the effectiveness of treatment with Oxbryta on a 7-point scale depicting a participant's rating of overall improvement. Participants/caregivers rated their change as very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse.

Time frame: Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60

Population: FAS included all participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and signed the inform consent, including screen failures (participants who did not receive Oxbryta within 6 months of the inform consent date). Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified time-points.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Much worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Much improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Minimally improved8 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Very much improved4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Very much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Much improved2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Minimally improved3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3No change4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 3Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Very much improved4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Much improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Minimally improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6No change5 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 6Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Very much improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9No change10 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 9Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Very much improved2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Much improved12 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Minimally improved8 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12No change15 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 12Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Very much improved4 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Much improved17 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Minimally improved11 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18No change7 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Minimally worse2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 18Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Very much improved3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Much improved14 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Minimally improved9 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24No change13 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Minimally worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Much worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 24Very much worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Very much improved6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Much improved12 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Minimally improved11 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30No change11 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Minimally worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Much worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 30Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Much improved12 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Minimally improved16 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36No change5 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Minimally worse2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 36Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Very much improved8 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Much improved11 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Minimally improved17 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42No change11 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Minimally worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 42Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Very much improved1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Much improved17 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Minimally improved9 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48No change7 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Minimally worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 48Very much worse1 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Very much improved0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Much improved5 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Minimally improved3 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54No change6 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 54Very much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Very much improved0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Much improved2 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Minimally improved0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60No change0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Minimally worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Much worse0 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants According to Responses to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Month 3 Through Month 60Month 60Very much worse0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) According to Severity

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Severity was classified using CTCAE, version 5.0, where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe. AEs are classified according to the severity in 3 categories a) mild - AEs does not interfere with participant's usual function b) moderate - AEs interferes to some extent with participant's usual function c) severe - AEs interferes significantly with participant's usual function. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment up to end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: SAS included all participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of Oxbryta including participants who had received at least one dose of Oxbryta in C5341018 (NCT04930328) (RETRO) study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeverityMild28 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeverityModerate83 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) According to SeveritySevere99 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Dose Modification or Discontinuation of Oxbryta

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Number of participants with AEs leading to dose modification or discontinuation of Oxbryta were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment up to end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: SAS included all participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of Oxbryta including participants who had received at least one dose of Oxbryta in C5341018 (NCT04930328) (RETRO) study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With AEs Leading to Dose Modification or Discontinuation of Oxbryta7 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Positive Pregnancy Test and Fertility Complications

Number of participants with positive pregnancy test and fertility complications were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment up to end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: SAS included all participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of Oxbryta including participants who had received at least one dose of Oxbryta in C5341018 (NCT04930328) (RETRO) study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Positive Pregnancy Test and Fertility Complications7 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions

Number of participants with RBC transfusions is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: SAS included all participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of Oxbryta including participants who had received at least one dose of Oxbryta in C5341018 (NCT04930328) (RETRO) study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions172 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With SCD Complications

SCD complications included acute pain crisis, acute chest syndrome (ACS), priapism, stroke, chronic or end stage kidney disease iron overload, leg ulcers, cardiac malfunction and pulmonary hypertension (PH) and RBC transfusions.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: Safety analysis set (SAS) included all participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of Oxbryta including participants who had received at least one dose of Oxbryta in C5341018 (NCT04930328) (RETRO) study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With SCD Complications205 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) According to Severity

An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the following criteria - resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect and other important medical events. Severity was classified using common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 5.0, where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe. Mild - SAEs does not interfere with participant's usual function b) moderate - SAEs interferes to some extent with participant's usual function c) severe - SAEs interferes significantly with participant's usual function.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment up to end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: SAS included all participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of Oxbryta including participants who had received at least one dose of Oxbryta in C5341018 (NCT04930328) (RETRO) study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) According to SeveritySevere87 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) According to SeverityMild8 Participants
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) According to SeverityModerate55 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Initiation or Modification of SCD-related Medications

Number of participants with treatment initiation or modification of SCD related medications is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: Safety analysis set (SAS) included all participants in the FAS who received at least one dose of Oxbryta including participants who had received at least one dose of Oxbryta in C5341018 (NCT04930328) (RETRO) study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment Initiation or Modification of SCD-related Medications259 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Change in Home Oxygen Supplementation From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: Data for this outcome measure was not collected due to premature termination of the study. Only limited efficacy data to support the benefit-risk evaluation of Oxbryta was collected.

Other Pre-specified

Change in Number of Emergency Department (ED) Visits From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment

ED visits were planned to be analyzed in this outcome measure.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: Data for this outcome measure was not collected due to premature termination of the study. Only limited efficacy data to support the benefit-risk evaluation of Oxbryta was collected.

Other Pre-specified

Change in Number of Hospitalizations From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment

Number of hospitalizations were planned to be analyzed.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: Data for this outcome measure was not collected due to premature termination of the study. Only limited efficacy data to support the benefit-risk evaluation of Oxbryta was collected.

Other Pre-specified

Change in Number of Outpatient Visits From Pre-Oxbryta Treatment

Outpatient visits (including infusion center, acute care, or telemedicine visit) were planned to be analyzed.

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: Data for this outcome measure was not collected due to premature termination of the study. Only limited efficacy data to support the benefit-risk evaluation of Oxbryta was collected.

Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Renal Dialysis

Time frame: From date of first Oxbryta treatment through the end of study (up to Month 60)

Population: Data for this outcome measure was not collected due to premature termination of the study. Only limited efficacy data to support the benefit-risk evaluation of Oxbryta was collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 1, 2026