Skip to content

Effect of Various Processed Oat Bran in a Beverage Matrix on Glycaemic Health

A Randomised, Double-blind, Controlled, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Acute Effect on Glycemic Response and Related Biomarkers When Replacing Rapidly Digested Carbohydrates by β-glucan-rich Oat Bran Processed in Different Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04930250
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-06-18
Start date
2021-07-19
Completion date
2021-12-21
Last updated
2022-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

Whilst a cause-and-effect relationship between consumption of oat ß-glucans and reduction in PPGR has been demonstrated, little is understood about its: * Application to liquid matrices: There are few studies which looked into the effect of a dose of ß-glucan applicable to beverages. Previous studies have explored oat ß-glucan doses between 2g to 13g per serving of test product (Note: the oat ß-glucan dose for the proposed trial is \<2g). * Impact following processing: Collectively, oat processing, ß-glucan structure and its physiological impact on PPGR are closely linked. Some studies have investigated the effect of oat processing or dosage on PPGR, but to our knowledge, no study has systematically characterised the effect of processing on oat structure, and clinically measured its subsequent impact on PPGR.

Detailed description

The proposed study is a randomised, double blind, controlled, crossover trial to investigate the postprandial effects on glycemic response and related biomarkers/biological surrogates in five test product beverages: This study will investigate the post-prandial effects of five test products, including two controls: 1. Beverage powder with 12% oat bran processed with method A (Test Product: TP-1) 2. Beverage powder with 12% oat bran processed with method B (Test Product: TP-2) 3. Beverage powder with 12% oat bran processed with method C (Test Product: TP-3) 4. Beverage powder with 12% minimally-processed oat bran (Positive Control) (Test Product: TP-PC) 5. Beverage powder without oat bran (Negative Control) (Test Product: TP-NC)

Interventions

OTHERBeverage powder with 12% oat bran processed with method A

50g of beverage powder to be reconstituted with 330ml of water. Subjects will orally consume one of the five test products in a random order over the five test visits.

OTHERBeverage powder with 12% oat bran processed with method B

50g of beverage powder to be reconstituted with 330ml of water. Subjects will orally consume one of the five test products in a random order over the five test visits.

OTHERBeverage powder with 12% oat bran processed with method C

50g of beverage powder to be reconstituted with 330ml of water. Subjects will orally consume one of the five test products in a random order over the five test visits.

OTHERPlacebo Comparator: Minimally-processed oat bran (Positive Control)

50g of beverage powder to be reconstituted with 330ml of water. Subjects will orally consume one of the five test products in a random order over the five test visits.

OTHERPlacebo Comparator: Readily-digestible carbohydrate (negative control)

50g of beverage powder to be reconstituted with 330ml of water. Subjects will orally consume one of the five test products in a random order over the five test visits.

Sponsors

National University Hospital, Singapore
CollaboratorOTHER
National University of Singapore
CollaboratorOTHER
Société des Produits Nestlé (SPN)
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The test products are coded by group coding (A - E).

Intervention model description

Randomised controlled, double-blind, full crossover study conducted in an acute setting. 20 subjects will receive 5 test products, over 5 separate test visits in a crossover design.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
24 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female participants, age between 24 and 39 years 2. Healthy individuals with no comorbidities or on regular medication 3. BMI between 18.5-25 kg/m2 4. Able to understand and willing to sign an informed consent form in English 5. Regularly consume breakfast 6. Able and willing to consume 330ml of liquid in 10 minutes 7. For female participants, have a regular menstrual cycle

Exclusion criteria

1. Known food allergies or intolerances specifically to gluten, milk, lactose or any grains 2. Known drug allergies specifically paracetamol 3. Known sensitivity or has had an adverse reaction to paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in the past 4. Individuals with regular prescriptions or regularly consume medication (at least once a month), including alternative medicine (e.g. traditional Chinese medicine) 5. Had been diagnosed or with a history of any metabolic disease or disorders, including diabetes, gestational diabetes and hypertension 6. Had been diagnosed or with a history of gastrointestinal disorders e.g. irritable bowel syndrome, constipation, diverticulitis 7. Had been hospitalised in the 3 months prior to the study. 8. Pregnant or lactating women, or planning to conceive in the next 3 months 9. Consumes more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day i.e. one drink is defined as either 150ml of wine, 340ml of beer/cider or 45ml of distilled spirit. 10. Smokers 11. Poor peripheral venous access based on past experiences with blood draw 12. Significant change in weight (≥ 3 kg body weight) in the past 3 months 13. Significant exercise pattern over the past 3 months defined as high-intensity exercise of more than 3 hours per week 14. Currently on a specialised diet e.g. vegetarian, vegan, weight loss plan, high protein diet 15. Unwilling to refrain from consuming fibre or prebiotic supplements, high fibre ingredients and more than 5 servings of fruits and vegetables per day over the length of the study. 16. Has donated blood in the past one month 17. Hierarchical link with the research team members 18. Participating in another clinical study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postprandial glycemic response - Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)through study completion, an average of 7 monthsPostprandial glycemic response reflected by 3-hour area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) assessed over all cross-sectional blood glucose values (i.e. T0/T15/T30/T45/T60/T90/T120/T180).
Postprandial glycemic response - Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)through study completion, an average of 7 monthsPostprandial glycemic response by the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) assessed over a 3-hour period by all cross-sectional blood glucose values (i.e. T0/T15/T30/T45/T60/T90/T120/T180).
Postprandial glycemic response - Time to Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax)through study completion, an average of 7 monthsPostprandial glycemic response reflected by time to achieve the peak plasma concentration (Tmax) assessed over a 3-hour period by all cross-sectional blood glucose values (i.e. T0/T15/T30/T45/T60/T90/T120/T180).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postprandial insulin response (PPIR)through study completion, an average of 7 monthsPPIR over a 3-hour period
Postprandial blood gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)through study completion, an average of 7 monthsPostprandial blood GIP over a 3-hour period
Postprandial blood glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)through study completion, an average of 7 monthsPostprandial blood GLP-1 over a 3-hour period
Gastric emptying ratethrough study completion, an average of 7 monthsGastric emptying rate measured through postprandial blood paracetamol concentration over a 4-hour period
Satietythrough study completion, an average of 7 monthsSatiety assessed via a Visual Analogue Scale questionnaire from 0-10 over a 4-hour period, with 0 being least satiated and 10 being most satiated
Gastrointestinal comfortthrough study completion, an average of 7 monthsGastrointestinal comfort assessed via a Visual Analogue Scale questionnaire from 0-10 over a 4-hour period, with 0 being lowest discomfort and 10 being greatest discomfort
Ingredient fermentability by colonic bacteriathrough study completion, an average of 7 monthsFermentability by colonic bacteria will be assessed via breath hydrogen and methane (ppm) levels over a 4-hour period

Countries

Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026