Skip to content

A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effect of an Inclisiran First Implementation Strategy Compared to Usual Care in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated LDL-C Despite Receiving Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (VICTORION-INITIATE)

A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inclisiran First Implementation Strategy to Usual Care on LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated LDL-C (≥70 mg/dL) Despite Receiving Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy (VICTORION-INITIATE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04929249
Acronym
V-INITIATE
Enrollment
450
Registered
2021-06-18
Start date
2021-06-25
Completion date
2023-09-15
Last updated
2025-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Keywords

Hyperlipidemia, Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD), Hypercholesterolemia, Lipid lowering therapies, Inclisiran

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an inclisiran first implementation strategy (addition of inclisiran to maximally tolerated statin therapy immediately upon failure to achieve acceptable LDL-C with maximally tolerated statin therapy alone) compared to usual care in an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) population.

Detailed description

The study design was a randomized, two-arm, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter, clinical trial comparing an inclisiran first implementation strategy to usual care (1:1 randomization) with established ASCVD and elevated LDL-C (or non-HDL-C) despite treatment with maximally tolerated statin therapy. Eligible patients had established ASCVD and elevated LDL-C levels ≥ 70 mg/dL (or non-HDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL) despite treatment with maximally tolerated statin therapy. In the inclisiran first implementation strategy group post-randomization, addition of other non-statin LDL-C lowering therapies (e.g., ezetimibe or bempedoic acid, excluding PCSK9 inhibiting monoclonal antibodies) were allowed to reach acceptable LDL-C levels. In the inclisiran first implementation strategy group, inclisiran was administered initially at randomization, 90 days later, and six months, thereafter.

Interventions

DRUGInclisiran

Inclisiran sodium 300 mg/1.5 ml (equivalent to 284 mg inclisiran liquid) in prefilled syringe (PFS).

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

randomized, two-arm, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants eligible for inclusion in this study must meet all of the following criteria: 1. Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation in the study 2. Males and females ≥18 years of age 3. History of ASCVD, documented by hospital records, claims data and/or prior laboratory/imaging assessments a Coronary heart disease (CHD): * Prior myocardial infarction * Prior coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) * Angiographic or CT-imaging (e.g., MDCT/CTA) evidence of coronary atherosclerosis (\>70% stenosis in at least one major epicardial coronary artery) b Cerebrovascular disease: * Prior ischemic stroke confirmed by a brain imaging study, CT or MRI; thought not to be caused by atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease or mural thrombus * Carotid artery stenosis \>70% on prior angiography or ultrasound * History of prior percutaneous or surgical carotid artery revascularization c Peripheral arterial disease (PAD): * Prior documentation of a resting ankle-brachial index ≤0.85 * History of prior percutaneous or surgical revascularization of an iliac, femoral, or popliteal artery or aortic aneurysm * Prior non-traumatic amputation of a lower extremity due to peripheral artery disease 4. Serum LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL 5. Fasting triglyceride \<5.65 mmol/L (\<500 mg/dL) at screening 6. Calculated glomerular filtration rate \>30 mL/min by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using standardized local clinical methodology 7. Participants should be on maximally tolerated statin therapy, as determined by the investigator, with no immediate plans to modify lipid lowering therapies. Statin intolerant patients are eligible if they had documented side effects on at least 2 different statins, including one at the lowest standard dose 8. Participants must be willing and able to give informed consent before initiation of any study related procedures and willing to comply with all required study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Participants meeting any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study. 1. Any uncontrolled or serious disease, or any medical or surgical condition, that may either interfere with participation in the clinical study, and/or put the participant at significant risk (according to investigator's \[or delegate\] judgment) if he/she participates in the clinical study 2. An underlying known disease, or surgical, physical, or medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator (or delegate) might interfere with interpretation of the clinical study results 3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure or last known left ventricular ejection fraction \<30% 4. Significant cardiac arrhythmia within 3 months prior to randomization that is not controlled by medication or via ablation at the time of screening 5. Major adverse cardiovascular event within 6 months prior to randomization 6. Uncontrolled severe hypertension: systolic blood pressure \>180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \>110 mmHg prior to randomization despite antihypertensive therapy 7. Severe concomitant non-cardiovascular disease that carries the risk of reducing life expectancy to less than 2 years 8. History of malignancy that required surgery (excluding local and wide-local excision), radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy during the two years prior to randomization 9. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using basic methods of contraception during dosing of investigational drug. Basic contraception methods include: 1. Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception 2. Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking investigational drug. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment 3. Male sterilization (at least 6 m prior to screening). For female participants in the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that participant 4. Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) 5. Use of oral (estrogen and progesterone), injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate \<1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS) In case of use of oral contraception, women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking investigational drug. Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential. 10. Known history of alcohol and/or drug abuse within the last 5 years (occasional casual users of illicit drugs in the opinion of the investigators are not excluded) 11. Treatment with other investigational products or devices within 30 days or five half-lives of the screening visit, whichever is longer 12. History of hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments or its excipients or to drugs of similar chemical classes 13. Planned use of other investigational products or devices during the course of the study 14. Any condition that according to the investigator could interfere with the conduct of the study, such as but not limited to: 1. Participants who are unable to communicate or to cooperate with the investigator 2. Unable to understand the protocol requirements, instructions and study-related restrictions, the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study (including participants whose cooperation is doubtful due to drug abuse or alcohol dependency) 3. Unlikely to comply with the protocol requirements, instructions, and study-related restrictions (e.g., uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and improbability of completing the study - including potential participants who indicate that their participation is contingent on receiving inclisiran) 4. Have any medical or surgical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator would put the participant at increased risk from participating in the study 5. Persons directly involved in the conduct of the study 15. Previous or current treatment (within 90 days of screening) with monoclonal antibodies directed towards PCSK9 or ezetimibe 16. Active liver disease defined as any known current infectious, neoplastic, or metabolic pathology of the liver or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation \>3x ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation \>3x ULN, or total bilirubin elevation \>2x ULN (except patients with Gilbert's syndrome) at screening confirmed by a repeat measurement at least one week apart

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-CBaseline, Day 330Percent change from baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Statin TherapyDay 330Percentage of patients who discontinued statin therapy ≥ 30 days before the end-of-study visit of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care, for patients in the FAS excluding those with a medical history of statin intolerance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across VisitsUp to 330 daysAverage absolute change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care across visits. Calculated by averaging the observed post-baseline values (absolute change) for each participant across analysis visits.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in LDL-CBaseline, Day 330Percentage of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330. Missing data is imputed using non-responder (i.e., negative outcome) imputation.
Percentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 100 mg/dL.Day 330Percentage of participants achieving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) \< 100 mg/dL (among the subset of participants with LDL-C \>=100 mg/dL at baseline) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330. Missing data is imputed using non-responder (i.e., negative outcome) imputation.
Percentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 70 mg/dLDay 330Percentage of participants achieving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) \< 70 mg/dL of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330. Missing data is imputed using non-responder (i.e., negative outcome) imputation.
Percentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 55 mg/dLDay 330Percentage of participants achieving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) \< 55 mg/dL of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330. Missing data is imputed using non-responder (i.e., negative outcome) imputation.
Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-CBaseline, Day 330Absolute change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330
Absolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineBaseline, Day 330Absolute change in plasma lipids, lipoproteins and triglycerides in participants receiving an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330
Percentage of Participants by Intensity of Lipid Lowering TherapyBaseline, Day 330Percentage of participants with decrease in dose, no change in dose or increase in dose to assess changes in background lipid-lowering therapy in participants receiving an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330
Proportion of Days Covered by MedicationUp to 330 DaysProportion of days covered refers to the total number of days on either statin, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibiting monoclonal antibody therapies taken during the study divided by total number of study days, calculated for each participant; If a participant did not take any of the four medications then the total number of days will be assumed to be zero.
LDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 90, Day 180, Day 270 and Day 330Visit-to-visit LDL-C variability from Day 90 until Day 330 of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care. It was assessed using two measures of variability: standard deviation and coefficient of variation.
LDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 90, Day 180, Day 270 and Day 330Visit-to-visit LDL-C variability from Day 90 until Day 330 of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care. It was assessed using two measures of variability: standard deviation and coefficient of variation.
Percent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineBaseline, Day 330Percent change in plasma lipids, lipoproteins and triglycerides in participants receiving an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330
Average Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across VisitsUp to 330 DaysAverage percent change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care across visits. Calculated by averaging the observed post-baseline values (percent change) for each participant across analysis visits.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted in 43 centers in the United States

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Inclisiran First
Inclisiran sodium 300 mg 1.5 ml (equivalent to 284 mg of inclisiran) + usual care
225
Usual Care
Treating physicians were recommended to treat patients in accordance with the 2018 ACC/AHA guidelines
225
Total450

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21
Overall StudyDeath21
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up311
Overall StudySubject decision68
Overall StudyTechnical problems01
Overall StudyWithdrew consent08

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInclisiran FirstUsual CareTotal
Age, Continuous66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.01
66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.84
66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.43
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
27 Participants29 Participants56 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
186 Participants187 Participants373 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
67 Participants72 Participants139 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
158 Participants153 Participants311 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 2341 / 216
other
Total, other adverse events
64 / 23453 / 216
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 23429 / 216

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Statin Therapy

Percentage of patients who discontinued statin therapy ≥ 30 days before the end-of-study visit of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care, for patients in the FAS excluding those with a medical history of statin intolerance.

Time frame: Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Participants with Medical History of Statin Intolerance were excluded from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Inclisiran FirstPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Statin Therapy6.0 Percentage of participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Statin Therapy16.7 Percentage of participants
97.5% CI: [-18.3, -3]Normal approx. to binomial distribution
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C

Percent change from baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of subjects who had LDL-C values at baseline and Day 330.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Inclisiran FirstPercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C-60.0 percent change in LDL-C
Usual CarePercent Change From Baseline in LDL-C-7.0 percent change in LDL-C
p-value: <0.00197.5% CI: [-60, -46]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C

Absolute change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330

Time frame: Baseline, Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of subjects who had LDL-C values at baseline and Day 330.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Inclisiran FirstAbsolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C-58.0 mg/dL
Usual CareAbsolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C-10.5 mg/dL
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-52.8, -42.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Absolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From Baseline

Absolute change in plasma lipids, lipoproteins and triglycerides in participants receiving an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330

Time frame: Baseline, Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of subjects who had values at baseline and Day 330

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Inclisiran FirstAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineNon-HDL Cholesterol-63.0 mg/dL
Inclisiran FirstAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineTriglycerides-25.4 mg/dL
Inclisiran FirstAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineHDL Cholesterol3.5 mg/dL
Inclisiran FirstAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineApolipoprotein B-43.6 mg/dL
Inclisiran FirstAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineVLDL Cholesterol-4.6 mg/dL
Inclisiran FirstAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineLipoprotein(a)-9.8 mg/dL
Inclisiran FirstAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineTotal Cholesterol-59.6 mg/dL
Usual CareAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineLipoprotein(a)-1.0 mg/dL
Usual CareAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineTotal Cholesterol-9.7 mg/dL
Usual CareAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineHDL Cholesterol0.3 mg/dL
Usual CareAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineNon-HDL Cholesterol-10.5 mg/dL
Usual CareAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineVLDL Cholesterol0.0 mg/dL
Usual CareAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineTriglycerides-0.1 mg/dL
Usual CareAbsolute Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineApolipoprotein B-7.3 mg/dL
Comparison: Total Cholesterolp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-56, -43.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: HDL Cholesterolp-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.8, 4.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Non-HDL Cholesterolp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-58.1, -46.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: VLDL Cholesterolp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-6.5, -2.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Triglyceridesp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-34.8, -15.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Apolipoprotein Bp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-39.7, -32.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Lipoprotein(a)p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-10.7, -6.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Average Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across Visits

Average absolute change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care across visits. Calculated by averaging the observed post-baseline values (absolute change) for each participant across analysis visits.

Time frame: Up to 330 days

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of subjects who had LDL-C average change from baseline values.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Inclisiran FirstAverage Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across Visits-55.0 mg/dL
Usual CareAverage Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across Visits-6.0 mg/dL
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-52.9, -44.9]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Average Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across Visits

Average percent change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care across visits. Calculated by averaging the observed post-baseline values (percent change) for each participant across analysis visits.

Time frame: Up to 330 Days

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of subjects who had LDL-C average change from baseline values.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Inclisiran FirstAverage Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across Visits-57.2 Average percent change in LDL-C
Usual CareAverage Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C Levels Across Visits-2.8 Average percent change in LDL-C
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-59, -49.8]Regression, Linear
Secondary

LDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of Variation

Visit-to-visit LDL-C variability from Day 90 until Day 330 of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care. It was assessed using two measures of variability: standard deviation and coefficient of variation.

Time frame: Day 90, Day 180, Day 270 and Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of subjects who had available values at each timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inclisiran FirstLDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 9063.90 Coefficient of Variation
Inclisiran FirstLDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 18069.00 Coefficient of Variation
Inclisiran FirstLDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 27067.56 Coefficient of Variation
Inclisiran FirstLDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 33065.34 Coefficient of Variation
Usual CareLDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 33040.89 Coefficient of Variation
Usual CareLDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 9040.65 Coefficient of Variation
Usual CareLDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 27036.38 Coefficient of Variation
Usual CareLDL-C Measures of Variability - Coefficient of VariationDay 18034.67 Coefficient of Variation
Secondary

LDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard Deviation

Visit-to-visit LDL-C variability from Day 90 until Day 330 of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care. It was assessed using two measures of variability: standard deviation and coefficient of variation.

Time frame: Day 90, Day 180, Day 270 and Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of subjects who had available values at each timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Inclisiran FirstLDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 9042.6 mg/dLStandard Deviation 27.21
Inclisiran FirstLDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 27046.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.22
Inclisiran FirstLDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 18041.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 28.39
Inclisiran FirstLDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 33038.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 25.33
Usual CareLDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 18091.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 31.61
Usual CareLDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 9094.3 mg/dLStandard Deviation 38.33
Usual CareLDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 33086.8 mg/dLStandard Deviation 35.47
Usual CareLDL-C Measures of Variability - Standard DeviationDay 27088.4 mg/dLStandard Deviation 32.16
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in LDL-C

Percentage of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330. Missing data is imputed using non-responder (i.e., negative outcome) imputation.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Inclisiran FirstPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in LDL-C69.8 Percentage of participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in LDL-C5.3 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [22.07, 81.16]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 100 mg/dL.

Percentage of participants achieving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) \< 100 mg/dL (among the subset of participants with LDL-C \>=100 mg/dL at baseline) of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330. Missing data is imputed using non-responder (i.e., negative outcome) imputation.

Time frame: Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Only a subset of participants with LDL-C \>=100 mg/dL at baseline were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Inclisiran FirstPercentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 100 mg/dL.80.5 Percentage of participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 100 mg/dL.32.1 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.72, 44.66]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 55 mg/dL

Percentage of participants achieving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) \< 55 mg/dL of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330. Missing data is imputed using non-responder (i.e., negative outcome) imputation.

Time frame: Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Inclisiran FirstPercentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 55 mg/dL71.6 Percentage of participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 55 mg/dL8.9 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [19.51, 63.24]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 70 mg/dL

Percentage of participants achieving Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) \< 70 mg/dL of an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330. Missing data is imputed using non-responder (i.e., negative outcome) imputation.

Time frame: Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Inclisiran FirstPercentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 70 mg/dL81.8 Percentage of participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants Achieving LDL-C < 70 mg/dL22.2 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [14.18, 42.19]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Intensity of Lipid Lowering Therapy

Percentage of participants with decrease in dose, no change in dose or increase in dose to assess changes in background lipid-lowering therapy in participants receiving an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330

Time frame: Baseline, Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of subjects who had values at baseline and Day 330.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Inclisiran FirstPercentage of Participants by Intensity of Lipid Lowering TherapyDecrease in statin intensity2.3 Percentage of participants
Inclisiran FirstPercentage of Participants by Intensity of Lipid Lowering TherapyNo change in statin intensity97.2 Percentage of participants
Inclisiran FirstPercentage of Participants by Intensity of Lipid Lowering TherapyIncrease in statin intensity0.5 Percentage of participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants by Intensity of Lipid Lowering TherapyDecrease in statin intensity4.5 Percentage of participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants by Intensity of Lipid Lowering TherapyNo change in statin intensity93.0 Percentage of participants
Usual CarePercentage of Participants by Intensity of Lipid Lowering TherapyIncrease in statin intensity2.5 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.89995% CI: [0.43, 2.61]proportional odds model
Secondary

Percent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From Baseline

Percent change in plasma lipids, lipoproteins and triglycerides in participants receiving an inclisiran first implementation strategy compared to usual care at Day 330

Time frame: Baseline, Day 330

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Number of participants analyzed corresponds to the number of subjects who had values at baseline and Day 330.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Inclisiran FirstPercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineNon-HDL Cholesterol-49.3 Percent change
Inclisiran FirstPercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineTriglycerides-10.6 Percent change
Inclisiran FirstPercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineHDL Cholesterol8.5 Percent change
Inclisiran FirstPercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineApolipoprotein B-46.4 Percent change
Inclisiran FirstPercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineVLDL Cholesterol-10.1 Percent change
Inclisiran FirstPercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineLipoprotein(a)-19.6 Percent change
Inclisiran FirstPercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineTotal Cholesterol-34.1 Percent change
Usual CarePercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineLipoprotein(a)2.3 Percent change
Usual CarePercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineTotal Cholesterol-4.1 Percent change
Usual CarePercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineHDL Cholesterol2.0 Percent change
Usual CarePercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineNon-HDL Cholesterol-5.1 Percent change
Usual CarePercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineVLDL Cholesterol6.8 Percent change
Usual CarePercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineTriglycerides7.2 Percent change
Usual CarePercent Change in Lipids and Other Lipoproteins From BaselineApolipoprotein B-3.8 Percent change
Comparison: Total Cholesterolp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-33.8, -26.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: HDL Cholesterolp-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.6, 9.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Non-HDL Cholesterolp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-49.1, -39.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: VLDL Cholesterolp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-23.8, -10]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Triglyceridesp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-24.7, -10.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Apolipoprotein Bp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-47.5, -37.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Lipoprotein(a)p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-25.8, -18]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Proportion of Days Covered by Medication

Proportion of days covered refers to the total number of days on either statin, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid or PCSK9 inhibiting monoclonal antibody therapies taken during the study divided by total number of study days, calculated for each participant; If a participant did not take any of the four medications then the total number of days will be assumed to be zero.

Time frame: Up to 330 Days

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all randomized patients. Participants with missing baseline LDL-C are excluded from the regression analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Inclisiran FirstProportion of Days Covered by Medication0.894 proportion of days coveredStandard Error 0.0169
Usual CareProportion of Days Covered by Medication0.902 proportion of days coveredStandard Error 0.0169
p-value: 0.72795% CI: [-0.055, 0.039]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026