Cognitive Decline, Health Behaviors, Self Efficacy, Social Isolation
Conditions
Keywords
Cognitive Health, Older Adults, Socialization
Brief summary
About 11% of the U.S. older adult population is at risk for or suffers from subjective cognitive decline. While some factors such as genetics and habitual physiological changes that affect brain health cannot be changed, research has shown that lifestyle changes such as participation in regular physical activity, staying socially engaged, and managing stress and diet can help to delay or reduce cognitive decline. Yet few brain health promotion programs exist and those that do fail to focus on global health and wellness as a strategy to improve brain health. Wits Workout is a holistic, 12-session, 60-minute per session, multi-modal workshop series that offers adults ages 50 and older facilitated, interactive dialogue and activities about behaviors that promote brain health. Each week includes a different themed module which has four activities and a training component.
Detailed description
While research has shown that lifestyle changes such as participation in regular physical activity, staying socially engaged, and managing stress can help to delay or reduce cognitive decline, few cognitive brain health programs exist. Those that do are targeted to a specific audience (i.e., Alzheimer's and related dementias) and primarily focus on one health domain (i.e. physical activity, diet) without the additional focus on multi-dimensions of health, which can also include intellectual engagement, social isolation, stress, sleep, and self-efficacy. Thus, there is a need for a more holistic cognitive health program aimed toward the general older adult population and particularly those that are underserved due to geographic location. Wits Workout, is a multi-modal 12-session (60 min/week) workshop series designed to enhance brain health among people ages 50 and older. Wits Workout addresses multiple factors that affect cognitive health such as physical activity, diet, intellectual engagement, social isolation, stress, sleep, and self-efficacy. The holistic workshop series is designed to be lay-leader led, interactive, and experiential. Preliminary evaluations demonstrate that this educational series serves a need in reducing isolation, increasing physical activity, promoting intellectual engagement, and enhancing overall brain health in older participants, all of which complement current aging brain health research. The researchers propose to conduct a two-arm randomized controlled trial with a treatment (workshop) group (n=120) and wait-list control group (n=120) who will receive the program after the 6-month study period is completed.
Interventions
12 week, one hour per week multi-modal, interactive training.
The control group will not receive the intervention during study period but will take baseline, 3 mos and 6 mos surveys. They will complete the workshop after the study period is over.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Two-arm, randomized trial with a treatment group and a waitlist control group.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 50 years or older * English-speaking and/or able to understand English * Have no diagnosis of Alzheimer's or related dementia * Score 28 or higher on the TICS cognitive screening * Able to participate in the 12 week program * Have not previously participated in a Wits Workout program
Exclusion criteria
* Under age 50, * Unable to speak or understand English, * Have a diagnosis of Alzheimer's or related dementia, * Score lower than 28 on TICS * Plan to miss more than two weeks of the program (i.e. traveling during that time period) * Have previously participated in a Wits Workout program.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Cognitive Function | Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline | The PROMIS Cognitive Function measure used to measure cognitive functioning. Raw score is converted into the T-score, with 50 being the mean score. 10 T-score is one standard deviation. Therefore, score above 50 means that a person is better than the average population in mental ability, and lower score meaning worse or disability. The score changing over time can indicate decline in cognitive function (lower score) or improved cognitive function (higher score) or no decline or improvement (same score). |
| Change in Cognitive Status | Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline | Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS). Used to measure cognitive status. For TICS - the minimum = 0 maximum = 50. Higher scores mean better cognition. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stress | Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline | Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Total scores range from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher stress. |
| Change in Social Satisfaction | Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline | Social Provisions Scale. Range of total score should be 24-96 with higher scores being a better outcome. |
| Self-efficacy | Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline | PROMIS general self efficacy short-form. Survey scores are changed into a T score, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The higher the score the greater the self-efficacy. |
| Change in Sleep | Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline | Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI has 7 sections which are scored. The seven component scores are then summed to yield a global PSQI score, which has a range of 0-21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. |
| Change in Physical Activity Levels | Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline | Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Scores range from 0 to 793, with higher scores indicating greater physical activity |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| WW Treatment Group Individuals will receive the 12-week Wits Workout Program. Individuals will take the baseline, 3 mos and 6 mos follow-up surveys. They will also take the Wits Workout satisfaction survey and participate in the 6 mos focus-groups.
Wits Workout Program: 12 week, one hour per week multi-modal, interactive training. | 152 |
| WW Control Group Individuals will be on a waitlist and will take the baseline, 3 mos and 6 mos. assessments. They will receive the Wits Workout workshop after the 6 month study period is completed.
Control Group that receives intervention after the study: The control group will not receive the intervention during study period but will take baseline, 3 mos and 6 mos surveys. They will complete the workshop after the study period is over. | 133 |
| Total | 285 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | WW Treatment Group | Total | WW Control Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 66.05921053 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.24936345 | 65.58246 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.607676 | 65.03759398 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.82438599 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 6 Participants | 13 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 146 Participants | 272 Participants | 126 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 14 Participants | 22 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 134 Participants | 253 Participants | 119 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 152 participants | 285 participants | 133 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 136 Participants | 257 Participants | 121 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 16 Participants | 28 Participants | 12 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 152 | 0 / 133 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 152 | 0 / 133 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 152 | 0 / 133 |
Outcome results
Change in Cognitive Function
The PROMIS Cognitive Function measure used to measure cognitive functioning. Raw score is converted into the T-score, with 50 being the mean score. 10 T-score is one standard deviation. Therefore, score above 50 means that a person is better than the average population in mental ability, and lower score meaning worse or disability. The score changing over time can indicate decline in cognitive function (lower score) or improved cognitive function (higher score) or no decline or improvement (same score).
Time frame: Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline
Population: Loss to follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Cognitive Function | 3 Months | 0.28 T score | Standard Deviation 4.27 |
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Cognitive Function | 6 Months | 1.84 T score | Standard Deviation 7.93 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Cognitive Function | 3 Months | .65 T score | Standard Deviation 4.08 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Cognitive Function | 6 Months | -.73 T score | Standard Deviation 6.97 |
Change in Cognitive Status
Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS). Used to measure cognitive status. For TICS - the minimum = 0 maximum = 50. Higher scores mean better cognition.
Time frame: Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline
Population: Loss to follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Cognitive Status | 3 Months | .96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.02 |
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Cognitive Status | 6 Months | 1.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.15 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Cognitive Status | 3 Months | .92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.17 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Cognitive Status | 6 Months | 1.22 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.21 |
Change in Physical Activity Levels
Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Scores range from 0 to 793, with higher scores indicating greater physical activity
Time frame: Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline
Population: Number analyzed changes due to loss to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Physical Activity Levels | Baseline | 68.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 50.3 |
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Physical Activity Levels | 3 Months | 57.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 43.05 |
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Physical Activity Levels | 6 Months | 68.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 48.37 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Physical Activity Levels | Baseline | 71.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 63.85 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Physical Activity Levels | 3 Months | 64.84 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 60.41 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Physical Activity Levels | 6 Months | 66.95 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 35 |
Change in Sleep
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI has 7 sections which are scored. The seven component scores are then summed to yield a global PSQI score, which has a range of 0-21; higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Time frame: Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline
Population: Loss to follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Sleep | 3 Months | 0.21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.82 |
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Sleep | 6 Months | 7.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.51 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Sleep | 3 Months | -.17 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Sleep | 6 Months | -6.37 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.38 |
Change in Social Satisfaction
Social Provisions Scale. Range of total score should be 24-96 with higher scores being a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline
Population: Loss to follow-up
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Social Satisfaction | 3 Months | .30 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.72 |
| WW Treatment Group | Change in Social Satisfaction | 6 Months | 0.23 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.69 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Social Satisfaction | 3 Months | -.72 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.86 |
| WW Control Group | Change in Social Satisfaction | 6 Months | -.43 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.79 |
Self-efficacy
PROMIS general self efficacy short-form. Survey scores are changed into a T score, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The higher the score the greater the self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline
Population: Sample size varies by time point due to drop out/loss to follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW Treatment Group | Self-efficacy | Baseline | 46.89 T-score | Standard Deviation 8 |
| WW Treatment Group | Self-efficacy | 3 Months | 48.10 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.47 |
| WW Treatment Group | Self-efficacy | 6 Months | 50.49 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.48 |
| WW Control Group | Self-efficacy | Baseline | 49.61 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.93 |
| WW Control Group | Self-efficacy | 3 Months | 50.22 T-score | Standard Deviation 8.33 |
| WW Control Group | Self-efficacy | 6 Months | 49.28 T-score | Standard Deviation 7.97 |
Stress
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Total scores range from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate higher stress.
Time frame: Baseline prior to the workshop, at 3 months after baseline and at 6 months after baseline
Population: Sample sizes change by time point due to loss to follow-up.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW Treatment Group | Stress | Baseline | 21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.89 |
| WW Treatment Group | Stress | 3 Months | 19.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.31 |
| WW Treatment Group | Stress | 6 Months | 19.65 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.26 |
| WW Control Group | Stress | Baseline | 20.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| WW Control Group | Stress | 3 Months | 20.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.34 |
| WW Control Group | Stress | 6 Months | 20.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.89 |