Skip to content

Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of PF-06947386 in Japanese Adult Patients With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection

A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE-ARM STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM (PF-06947386) PLUS METRONIDAZOLE IN JAPANESE ADULT PATIENTS WITH COMPLICATED INTRA-ABDOMINAL INFECTION REQUIRING HOSPITALIZATION

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04927312
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-06-15
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2022-09-15
Last updated
2024-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection

Keywords

Ceftazidime-avibactam,, Metronidazole,, complicated intra-abdominal infection

Brief summary

Study C3591036 is a Phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of PF-06947386 in Japanese adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection requiring hospitalization. This is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. All eligible participants will receive intravenous infusion of PF-06947386 followed by intravenous infusion of metronidazole.

Interventions

DRUGPF-06947386

Ceftazidime-Avibactam powder for concentrate for solution for infusion 2.0 g/ 0.5 g. Dosage will be adjusted based on renal function after enrollment.

DRUGMetronidazole

Metronidazole 0.5 g solution for injection.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant who is capable of giving signed, dated and timed informed consent (or by their legally acceptable representative) * Participant aged 20 years or older * Participant who is willing and able to comply with all scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures * Confirmation of infection by surgical intervention within 24 hours of entry: evidence of systemic inflammatory response; physical findings consistent with intra-abdominal infection; supportive radiologic imaging findings of intra-abdominal infections * Intraoperative/postoperative enrollment with visual confirmation (presence of pus within the abdominal cavity) of an intra-abdominal infection associated with peritonitis

Exclusion criteria

* Participant will undergo surgery for traumatic bowel perforation within 12 hours or perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers within 24 hours. Other intra-abdominal processes that are not infectious. * Participant has abdominal wall abscess or bowel obstruction without perforation or ischemic bowel without perforation * Participant whose surgery will include staged abdominal repair, or open abdomen technique, or marsupialization. * Participant has evidence of sepsis with shock not responding to IV fluid challenge or anticipated to require the administration of vasopressors for \>24 hours * Participant has suspected intra-abdominal infections due to fungus, parasites (eg, amebic liver abscess), virus, or tuberculosis * Participant is considered unlikely to survive the 6- to 8-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness * Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding. * Participant has received systemic antibacterial agents within the 72-hour period prior to study entry except for cases specified in the protocol such that participant is considered to have failed the previous treatment regimen, or participant has received systemic antibiotic agents no more than 24 hours (no more than one daily dose) within the 72-hour period prior to study entry, etc. * Estimated CrCL ≤50 mL/min calculated by Cockcroft-Gault method.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis SetTOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)Up to Day 49An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect as per medical or scientific judgment. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. TEAE was defined as an AE that emerges or worsened during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day were flagged as TEAEs.
All-cause MortalityUp to Day 49Number of participants with death is presented.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment and Study Due to Adverse EventsUp to Day 49Number of participants who discontinued treatment and study due to adverse events is presented.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49A semiautomated recording device was used to measure SBP and DBP with participant in a supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateBaseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Pulse rate was measured for in a supine position preceded by at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightBaseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Body weight was measured using a balance scale.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureBaseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Temperature was measured in a supine position, after the participant had rest for at least 5 minutes.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateBaseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Respiratory rate was measured in a supine position, after the participant had rest for at least 5 minutes.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test AbnormalitiesUp to Day 49Criteria for abnormal laboratory values for chemistry parameters: Bilirubin \>1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN), direct Bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, total protein and albumin \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), urea nitrogen and creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, sodium \>0.95\*LLN, potassium \>0.9\*LLN and \>1.1\*ULN, calcium \>0.9\*LLN, glucose \> 1.5\*LLN; hematology parameters: Hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes \<0.8\*LLN, platelets \<0.5\*LLN and \> 1.75\*ULN, leukocytes \<0.6\*LLN and \<0.6\*LLN, lymphocytes \<0.8\* LLN, lymphocytes/leukocytes \<0.8\* LLN and \>1.2\*ULN, neutrophils \>1.2\*ULN, neutrophils/leukocytes \<0.8\*LLN and \>1.2\* ULN, basophils/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN, eosinophils \>1.2\*ULN, eosinophils/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN, monocytes and monocytes/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN; Criteria for abnormal laboratory values for urinalysis parameters: urine glucose, \>=1, urine protein \>=1, urine Hemoglobin\>=1.
Plasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 3, Day 4, and Combination of Day 3 and 4: 15 minutes before or after infusion, 30-90 minutes after infusion, 300-360 minutes after infusionPlasma concentrations of avibactam was measured by nominal sampling window.
Plasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 3, Day 4, and Combination of Day 3 and 4: 15 minutes before or after infusion, 30-90 minutes after infusion, 300-360 minutes after infusionPlasma concentrations of ceftazidime was measured by nominal sampling window.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: ME Analysis SetTOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: eME Analysis SetTOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs & symptoms of index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28¬-35 calendar days after day of 1st IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptom of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate:Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU:after 42 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 42-49 calendar days from 1st IV infusion. TOC:after 28 calendar days from 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28-35 calendar days after 1st IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs & symptoms of index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28¬-35 calendar days after day of 1st IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptom of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate:Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU:after 42 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 42-49 calendar days from 1st IV infusion. TOC:after 28 calendar days from 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28-35 calendar days after 1st IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetEOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Participants SubsetUp to Day 49An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect as per medical or scientific judgment. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. TEAE was defined as an AE that emerges or worsened during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day were flagged as TEAEs.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetUp to Day 49An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect as per medical or scientific judgment. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. TEAE was defined as an AE that emerges or worsened during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day were flagged as TEAEs.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: MITT Analysis SetTOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: mMITT Analysis SetTOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 60 Japanese hospitalized participants with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) were enrolled in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PF-06947386 + Metronidazole
Participants received intravenous (IV) infusion of PF-06947386 (2.0 gram (g) of ceftazidime and 0.5 g of avibactam) every 8 hours, immediately followed by an IV administration of metronidazole (0.5 g) for 60 minutes. Participants received a minimum of 5 full days (15 doses) of IV study intervention up to a maximum of 14 full days (42 doses) of study intervention.
60
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyOther1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPF-06947386 + Metronidazole
Age, Continuous56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
60 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
60 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
34 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35

Population: CE analysis set included participants who had an appropriate diagnosis of cIAI; either received therapy for greater than or equal to (\>=) 48 hours, with \>=80 percent (%) of the scheduled drug administered over number of days administered or received therapy less than (\<) 48 hours before discontinuing treatment due to an adverse event (AE).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis SetClinical Cure36 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis SetClinical Failure4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit: Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis SetIndeterminate0 Participants
Secondary

All-cause Mortality

Number of participants with death is presented.

Time frame: Up to Day 49

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleAll-cause Mortality1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse Rate

Pulse rate was measured for in a supine position preceded by at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 8-9.1 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 14.69
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateBaseline82.6 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 13.5
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 2-4.8 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 11.54
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 3-7.1 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 13.04
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 4-8.9 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 14.92
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 5-11.3 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 15.46
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 6-12.4 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 15.61
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 7-11.0 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 18.09
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 9-12.0 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 20.25
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 10-8.0 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 29.5
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 11-12.3 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 24.57
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 12-18.7 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 35.36
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 13-18.0 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 37.51
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateDay 14-24.5 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 53.03
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateEOT-8.7 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 16.56
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateTOC-8.8 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 16.43
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Pulse RateLFU-9.4 Beats per minuteStandard Deviation 16.07
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory Rate

Respiratory rate was measured in a supine position, after the participant had rest for at least 5 minutes.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateBaseline17.8 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 3.39
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 20.4 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 5.91
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 3-0.4 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 4.41
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 4-1.1 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 3.97
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 5-0.5 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 4.79
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 6-1.3 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 3.9
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 7-1.6 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 3.63
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 8-1.1 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.66
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 9-2.8 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 3.27
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 100.2 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 3.19
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 11-1.8 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 4.19
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 12-3.3 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 4.16
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 13-0.3 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 4.93
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateDay 140.5 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 9.19
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateEOT-0.6 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 4.3
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateTOC-1.2 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 4.15
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Respiratory RateLFU-1.6 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 3.88
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

A semiautomated recording device was used to measure SBP and DBP with participant in a supine position after at least 5 minutes of rest.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Baseline, SBP119.0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 17.73
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 2, SBP3.8 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 16.05
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 3, SBP6.1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 20.44
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 4, SBP8.0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 18.27
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 5, SBP8.2 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 18.26
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 6, SBP2.2 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 22.92
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 7, SBP2.8 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 21.61
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 8, SBP4.9 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 21.14
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 9, SBP-9.6 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 20.61
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 10, SBP-8.6 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 23.86
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 11, SBP-11.8 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 16.5
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 12, SBP-16.3 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 27.57
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 13, SBP-10.7 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 35.5
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 14, SBP-20.0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 33.94
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)EOT, SBP2.1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 17.56
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)TOC, SBP2.1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 19.34
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)LFU, SBP4.7 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 18.78
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Baseline, DBP70.6 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 12.9
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 2, DBP0.1 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 11.31
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 3, DBP2.4 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 12.77
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 4, DBP4.8 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 15.13
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 5, DBP4.0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 13.9
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 6, DBP2.0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 16.36
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 7, DBP4.4 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 17.53
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 8, DBP8.5 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 14.9
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 9, DBP0.2 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 21.05
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 10, DBP-3.4 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 23.1
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 11, DBP2.3 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 24.8
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 12, DBP-5.0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 23.3
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 13, DBP-7.0 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 32.19
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Day 14, DBP-9.5 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 43.13
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)EOT, DBP0.7 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 12.74
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)TOC, DBP2.9 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 13.26
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)LFU, DBP3.4 Millimeters of MercuryStandard Deviation 13.86
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Temperature

Temperature was measured in a supine position, after the participant had rest for at least 5 minutes.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureBaseline37.01 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.643
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 20.33 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.653
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 30.09 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.65
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 4-0.05 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.679
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 5-0.12 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.659
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 6-0.29 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.782
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 7-0.20 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.846
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 8-0.19 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.607
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 9-0.12 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.698
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 10-0.26 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.811
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 11-0.30 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.739
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 120.13 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.321
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 13-0.27 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.493
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureDay 14-0.10 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.141
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureEOT-0.38 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.711
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureTOC-0.58 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.766
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: TemperatureLFU-0.54 Degree CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.684
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: Weight

Body weight was measured using a balance scale.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in safety analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively. Here, Number Analyzed signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightBaseline62.05 KilogramsStandard Deviation 12.975
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 20.64 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.587
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 30.68 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.927
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 40.34 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.578
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 50.39 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.949
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 60.82 KilogramsStandard Deviation 1.593
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 71.55 KilogramsStandard Deviation 2.415
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 81.80 KilogramsStandard Deviation 3.894
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 95.80 Kilograms
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 105.00 Kilograms
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 115.40 Kilograms
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 12-0.05 KilogramsStandard Deviation 5.303
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleChange From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters at Day 2 to 14, EOT, TOC and, LFU Visits: WeightDay 131.35 KilogramsStandard Deviation 4.455
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment and Study Due to Adverse Events

Number of participants who discontinued treatment and study due to adverse events is presented.

Time frame: Up to Day 49

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment and Study Due to Adverse EventsDiscontinued Treatment due to AE0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment and Study Due to Adverse EventsDiscontinued study due to AE2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: mMITT analysis set included all enrolled participant who met the disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug and had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry (regardless of isolate susceptibilities).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Cure38 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Failure4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis SetEOT, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Cure36 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Failure4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis SetLFU, Indeterminate2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: MITT analysis set included all enrolled participants who had clinical evidence of cIAI and received any amount of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Cure54 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Failure4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis SetEOT, Indeterminate1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Cure52 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Failure4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Analysis SetLFU, Indeterminate3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities

Criteria for abnormal laboratory values for chemistry parameters: Bilirubin \>1.5\*upper limit of normal (ULN), direct Bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, total protein and albumin \<0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN), urea nitrogen and creatinine \>1.3\*ULN, sodium \>0.95\*LLN, potassium \>0.9\*LLN and \>1.1\*ULN, calcium \>0.9\*LLN, glucose \> 1.5\*LLN; hematology parameters: Hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes \<0.8\*LLN, platelets \<0.5\*LLN and \> 1.75\*ULN, leukocytes \<0.6\*LLN and \<0.6\*LLN, lymphocytes \<0.8\* LLN, lymphocytes/leukocytes \<0.8\* LLN and \>1.2\*ULN, neutrophils \>1.2\*ULN, neutrophils/leukocytes \<0.8\*LLN and \>1.2\* ULN, basophils/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN, eosinophils \>1.2\*ULN, eosinophils/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN, monocytes and monocytes/leukocytes \>1.2\*ULN; Criteria for abnormal laboratory values for urinalysis parameters: urine glucose, \>=1, urine protein \>=1, urine Hemoglobin\>=1.

Time frame: Up to Day 49

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities60 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: mMITT analysis set included all enrolled participant who met the disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug and had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry (regardless of isolate susceptibilities).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Favorable38 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Unfavorable4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Favorable36 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Unfavorable4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Indeterminate2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Favorable36 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Unfavorable4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Indeterminate2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect as per medical or scientific judgment. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. TEAE was defined as an AE that emerges or worsened during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day were flagged as TEAEs.

Time frame: Up to Day 49

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of IV study intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)AEs42 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)SAEs3 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: CE analysis set evaluated. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in CE analysis set at EOT and LFU respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Cure90.5 Percentage of participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Failure9.5 Percentage of participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis SetEOT, Indeterminate0 Percentage of participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Cure90.0 Percentage of participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Failure10.0 Percentage of participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) and Late Follow-up (LFU) Visits: CE Analysis SetLFU, Indeterminate0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: ME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in ME analysis set at EOT and LFU respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Cure94.4 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Failure5.6 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis SetEOT, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Cure94.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Failure5.7 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT and LFU Visits: Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis SetLFU, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: eME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in eME analysis set at EOT and LFU respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Cure94.6 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis SetEOT, Clinical Failure5.4 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis SetEOT, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Cure94.4 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis SetLFU, Clinical Failure5.6 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response EOT and LFU Visits: Extended Microbiologically Evaluable (eME) Analysis SetLFU, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: eME analysis set: participants who were included in subset of CE participants \& had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed:participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed: participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC \& LFU.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Escherichia Coli93.5 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Mirabilis100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Penneri100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Vulgaris100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Raoultella Planticola50.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Escherichia Coli93.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Mirabilis100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Penneri100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Vulgaris100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Raoultella Planticola0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Escherichia Coli93.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Mirabilis100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Penneri100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Vulgaris100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Raoultella Planticola0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: ME analysis set: participants who were included in subset of CE participants \& had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed:participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed:participants included in ME analysis set at EOT,TOC \& LFU

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Escherichia Coli93.5 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Mirabilis100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Penneri100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Vulgaris100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Raoultella Planticola50.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Escherichia Coli93.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Mirabilis100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Penneri100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Vulgaris100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Raoultella Planticola0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Escherichia Coli93.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Mirabilis100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Penneri100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Vulgaris100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Raoultella Planticola0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: mMITT analysis set:all enrolled participant who met disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug; had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry.Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed:participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC \& LFU.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Escherichia Coli93.5 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Mirabilis100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Penneri100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Vulgaris100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Raoultella Planticola50.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Escherichia Coli93.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Mirabilis100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Penneri100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Vulgaris100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Raoultella Planticola0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Escherichia Coli93.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Mirabilis100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Penneri100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Vulgaris100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Raoultella Planticola0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: eME analysis set: participants who were included in subset of CE participants \& had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed:participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed: participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC \& LFU.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible93.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible50.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible93.1 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible93.1 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: ME analysis set: participants who were included in subset of CE participants \& had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed:participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed:participants included in ME analysis set at EOT,TOC \& LFU

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible93.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible50.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible93.1 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible93.1 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis Set

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: mMITT analysis set:all enrolled participant who met disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug; had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry.Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants evaluable for this outcome measure however all participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Number Analyzed:participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC \& LFU

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible93.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible50.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetEOT, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible93.1 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Enterobacter Aerogenes, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible93.1 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Oxytoca, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Mirabilis, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Penneri, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Proteus Vulgaris, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Raoultella Planticola, Susceptible0.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: mMITT Analysis SetLFU, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Susceptible100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis Set

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: eME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in eME analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Favorable94.6 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Unfavorable5.4 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetEOT, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Favorable94.4 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Unfavorable5.6 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetTOC, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Favorable94.4 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Unfavorable5.6 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: eME Analysis SetLFU, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis Set

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. Indeterminate were not included in the denominator. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: ME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in ME analysis set at EOT, TOC and LFU respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Favorable94.4 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Unfavorable5.6 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetEOT, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Favorable94.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Unfavorable5.7 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetTOC, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Favorable94.3 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Unfavorable5.7 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: ME Analysis SetLFU, Indeterminate0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Avibactam

Plasma concentrations of avibactam was measured by nominal sampling window.

Time frame: Day 3, Day 4, and Combination of Day 3 and 4: 15 minutes before or after infusion, 30-90 minutes after infusion, 300-360 minutes after infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who have at least 1 plasma concentration data value available for either Ceftazidime or Avibactam. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 3, 15 minutes before or after13810 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 5911.5
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 3, 30-90 minutes after8321 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 3776.9
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 3, 300-360 minutes after1148 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 708.04
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 4, 15 minutes before or after13940 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 4352.1
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 4, 30-90 minutes after7897 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 2926.5
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 4, 300-360 minutes after1651 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 2195.6
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 3 and Day 4, 15 minutes before or after13870 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 5240.9
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 3 and Day 4, 30-90 minutes after8098 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 3332.2
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of AvibactamDay 3 and 4, 300-360 minutes after1382 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 1589.6
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Ceftazidime

Plasma concentrations of ceftazidime was measured by nominal sampling window.

Time frame: Day 3, Day 4, and Combination of Day 3 and 4: 15 minutes before or after infusion, 30-90 minutes after infusion, 300-360 minutes after infusion

Population: PK analysis set included all participants who have at least 1 plasma concentration data value available for either Ceftazidime or Avibactam. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 3, 30-90 minutes after48800 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 16611
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 3, 300-360 minutes after10030 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 5852.5
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 4, 30-90 minutes after49190 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 13095
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 3, 15 minutes before or after72940 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 21323
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 4, 15 minutes before or after76680 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 26157
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 4, 300-360 minutes after13920 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 13135
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 3 and Day 4, 15 minutes before or after74580 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 23418
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 3 and Day 4, 30-90 minutes after49010 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 14729
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePlasma Concentration of CeftazidimeDay 3 and Day 4, 300-360 minutes after11840 Nanograms per milliliterStandard Deviation 10028
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset

Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs & symptoms of index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28¬-35 calendar days after day of 1st IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptom of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate:Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU:after 42 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 42-49 calendar days from 1st IV infusion. TOC:after 28 calendar days from 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28-35 calendar days after 1st IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria; Clinical: at least one criteria at Baseline. 1) body temperature \>=38 degree Celsius or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 cells/mm3 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 beats per minute (bpm), 4) SBP \<90mmHg, 5) C-reactive protein (CRP) \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetEOT, Clinical Cure1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetEOT, Clinical Failure0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetEOT, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetTOC, Clinical Cure1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetTOC, Clinical Failure0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetTOC, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetLFU, Clinical Cure1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetLFU, Clinical Failure0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetLFU, Indeterminate0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset

Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs & symptoms of index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28¬-35 calendar days after day of 1st IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptom of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate:Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU:after 42 calendar days from day of 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 42-49 calendar days from 1st IV infusion. TOC:after 28 calendar days from 1st IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28-35 calendar days after 1st IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Sepsis participants subset included participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria; total score \>=2 in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) for intensive care unit (ICU) participants, 2 items or more in quick SOFA (qSOFA) for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens (aerobic Gram-negative bacteria -either Enterobacterales or aerobic Gram-negative pathogens other than Enterobacterales) isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Clinical Cure2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Clinical Failure0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Clinical Cure2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Clinical Failure0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Clinical Cure2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Clinical Failure0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Indeterminate0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: eME Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35

Population: eME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that is susceptible.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: eME Analysis SetTOC, Clinical Cure34 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: eME Analysis SetTOC, Clinical Failure2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: eME Analysis SetTOC, Indeterminate0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: ME Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35

Population: ME analysis set included participants who were included in a subset of CE participants and had at least 1 Gram-negative aerobic pathogen in the initial/prestudy culture that was susceptible.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: ME Analysis SetTOC, Clinical Cure33 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: ME Analysis SetTOC, Clinical Failure2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC: ME Analysis SetTOC, Indeterminate0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: MITT Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35

Population: MITT analysis set included all enrolled participants who had clinical evidence of cIAI.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: MITT Analysis SetTOC, Clinical Cure52 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: MITT Analysis SetTOC, Clinical Failure4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: MITT Analysis SetTOC, Indeterminate3 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: mMITT Analysis Set

Clinical response: Clinical response of cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antimicrobial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. TOC was after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion; clinical failure: Death related to intra-abdominal infection, Persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, Postsurgical wound infections, participant who received treatment with additional antibiotics for ongoing symptoms of intra-abdominal infection; Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: TOC: Any day from Day 28 to Day 35

Population: mMITT analysis set included all enrolled participant who met the disease definition of cIAI; received any amount of study drug and had at least 1 etiologic pathogen identified at study entry (regardless of isolate susceptibilities).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Clinical Cure36 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Clinical Failure4 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Clinical Response at TOC Visit: mMITT Analysis SetTOC, Indeterminate2 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria. Clinical: at least 1 criteria at Baseline, 1) body temperature \>=38 or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 bpm, 4) SBP \<90 mmHg, 5) CRP \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetEOT, Escherichia Coli1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetTOC, Escherichia Coli1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetLFU, Escherichia Coli1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants Subset

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria. Clinical: at least 1 criteria at Baseline, 1) body temperature \>=38 or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 bpm, 4) SBP \<90 mmHg, 5) CRP \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluation Participants SubsetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Sepsis participants subset: participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria: total score \>=2 in SOFA for ICU participants, 2 items or more in qSOFA for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants included in Sepsis participants subset at EOT and LFU respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Escherichia Coli, Susceptible1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response by MIC Categories at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae, Susceptible1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria. Clinical: at least 1 criteria at Baseline, 1) body temperature \>=38 or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 bpm, 4) SBP \<90 mmHg, 5) CRP \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetEOT, Favorable1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetEOT, Unfavorable0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetEOT, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetTOC, Favorable1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetTOC, Unfavorable0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetTOC, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetLFU, Favorable1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetLFU, Unfavorable0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetLFU, Indeterminate0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Sepsis participants subset included participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria; total score \>=2 in SOFA for ICU participants, 2 items or more in qSOFA for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens (aerobic Gram-negative bacteria -either Enterobacterales or aerobic Gram-negative pathogens other than Enterobacterales) isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Favorable2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Unfavorable0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Favorable2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Unfavorable0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Indeterminate0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Favorable2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Unfavorable0 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Microbiological Response EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Indeterminate0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Evaluable Participants Subset

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect as per medical or scientific judgment. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. TEAE was defined as an AE that emerges or worsened during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day were flagged as TEAEs.

Time frame: Up to Day 49

Population: Sepsis evaluable participants subset: participants who satisfied both clinical and microbiological criteria. Clinical: at least 1 criteria at Baseline, 1) body temperature \>=38 or \<36 degree Celsius, 2) WBC \>12000 or \<4000 cells/mm3, or immature neutrophil \>10%, 3) heart rate \>90 bpm, 4) SBP \<90 mmHg, 5) CRP \>=20 mg/dL. Microbiological: The most relevant pathogens isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetAEs1 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Evaluable Participants SubsetSAEs0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Participants Subset

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect as per medical or scientific judgment. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. TEAE was defined as an AE that emerges or worsened during the effective duration of treatment. All events that started on or after the first dosing day were flagged as TEAEs.

Time frame: Up to Day 49

Population: Sepsis participants subset included participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria; total score \>=2 in SOFA for ICU participants, 2 items or more in qSOFA for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens (aerobic Gram-negative bacteria -either Enterobacterales or aerobic Gram-negative pathogens other than Enterobacterales) isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Participants SubsetAEs2 Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazoleNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent AEs and SAEs: Sepsis Participants SubsetSAEs0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants Subset

Microbiological response: Favorable microbiological response assessments include eradication, presumed eradication and colonization. Unfavorable microbiological response assessments include persistence, persistence with increasing MIC, and presumed persistence. Indeterminate: Study data was not available for evaluation of efficacy. EOT: within 24 hours after completion of last IV infusion. Response of baseline pathogens cultured from intra-abdominal site or blood. A participant can have more than 1 pathogen. LFU: after 42 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, the allowed visit window was 42 to 49 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion. TOC: after 28 calendar days from the day of the first IV infusion, allowed visit window was 28 to 35 calendar days after the day of the first IV infusion.

Time frame: EOT: 24 hours after last IV infusion; TOC: Any day from Day 28 to 35; LFU: Any day from Day 42 to Day 49

Population: Sepsis participants subset: participants who satisfied clinical \& microbiological criteria; total score \>=2 in SOFA for ICU participants, 2 items or more in qSOFA for non-ICU participants; most relevant pathogens (aerobic Gram-negative bacteria -either Enterobacterales or aerobic Gram-negative pathogens other than Enterobacterales) isolated from blood at Baseline regardless of susceptibility. Number Analyzed: participants included in Sepsis participants subset at EOT \& LFU respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Escherichia Coli100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetEOT, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Escherichia Coli100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetTOC, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Escherichia Coli100.0 Percentage of Participants
PF-06947386 + MetronidazolePercentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT, TOC and LFU Visits: Sepsis Participants SubsetLFU, Klebsiella Pneumoniae100.0 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026