Skip to content

ECT vs. Esketamine

Electroconvulsive Therapy vs. Esketamine Nasal Spray in Treatment-resistant Depression: a Longitudinal, Randomized Efficacy Comparison Pilot Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04924257
Acronym
ETES
Enrollment
0
Registered
2021-06-11
Start date
2021-07-28
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2022-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment Resistant Depression, Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a common cause of disability and one of the most common psychiatric disorders worldwide. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is currently the most effective treatment for TRD. Recent developments showed esketamine to be a rapid-acting and effective antidepressant drug and it has been hailed as a breakthrough in treating TRD. Common treatment algorithms for TRD list ECT as a treatment option, but esketamine has not yet found its exact position in those algorithms. To the investigators' knowledge, a longitudinal, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of ECT and intranasal esketamine in TRD patients has not been conducted. Furthermore, the investigators intend to measure effects of ECT and intranasal esketamine on brain connectivity and structure, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In this study, inpatients with TRD at the University Hospital for Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, will be randomized to ECT or intranasal esketamine. Short- and medium-term treatment effects on functional and structural connectivity in the brain will be determined using fMRI.

Interventions

Patients will receive two treatments per week for four weeks (maximum of eight treatment sessions) or until clinical remission (MADRS \<10).

PROCEDUREElectroconvulsive therapy

Patients will receive three treatments per week for four weeks (maximum of 12 ECT treatments) or until clinical remission (MADRS \<10).

Sponsors

Medical University Innsbruck
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. DSM-5 diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) without psychotic features (296.22, 296.23, 296.32, 296.33) made through the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-V (SCID-V). 2. MADRS score ≥ 25 3. Pharmacologically treatment-resistant depressive episode \[Stage ≥ II, defined by Thase & Rush (1997): failure of at least 2 adequate trials of at least 2 distinctly different classes of antidepressants (≥ 4 weeks each)\] (88). 4. Age: 18 - 50 years 5. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Participation in another interventional clinical trial 2. Relative contraindications to ECT treatment in accordance with the consensus paper of the Austrian Society of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy: 3. Patients who meet any

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MADRS score4 weeksReduction of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS, 0-60 pts.); higher score indicates more depressive symptoms; response to treatment is defined as \>50% reduction in score

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026