Skip to content

Ovarian Injection of PRP (Platelet -Rich Plasma) Vs Normal Saline in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

Ovarian Injection of PRP (Platelet -Rich Plasma) Vs Normal Saline in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04922398
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-06-10
Start date
2021-06-20
Completion date
2021-12-30
Last updated
2021-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Premature Ovarian Failure

Keywords

premature ovarian failure, poor responders, poor ovarian reserve, PRP

Brief summary

60 cases with premature ovarian insufficiency will be randomized to either receive PRP or saline injection in their ovaries. Then follow up by hormonal & ultrasound & clinically to monitor any changes

Detailed description

In this pilot study, 60 patients will be included. All patients will have a premature ovarian insufficiency (PORs) who meet at least two of the following three Bologna criteria. The following data will be registered for all the cases: age, weight, height, menstrual history, previous pregnancies and their outcome, no. of living children and age of the youngest, history symptoms, married for how long, infertility duration and whether primary or secondary. Estimation of Antral Follicle Count (AFC) will be done for all the patients by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). Finally, a blood sample will be withdrawn for the following lab. Investigations: FSH, LH, E2, AMH, TSH, Prolactin before inclusion of the patients in the study. A written consent form will be signed by all patients after complete explanation of the procedures and the expectations of the trial. Patients will be randomized into 2 groups (A& B). All will undergo a transvaginal intervention through an ovum pickup needle 17 G for the procedure. The group A consists of 30 patients, who will receive a PRP (autologous platelet-rich plasma injection) with activation with calcium chloride. The group B consists of 30 patients, who will receive a normal saline inj. 0.9% Nacl. Sample preparation of the PRP: According to the classification proposed by Ehrenfest, 4 different types of PRP are defined, depending on the content of cells and the presence of fibrin. In regards to the Classification of PRP in this case study, it is used as a commercial type of PRP with the lower concentration (2.5 x 3 times) system, Ycellbio PRP. The process will be carried out under strict aseptic conditions as well as optimum temperature regulations, i.e., 21-24°C. PRP will be prepared according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Draw 1 CC anticoagulant (sodium citrate) into a 20 CC syringe. Coat the inside walls of the syringe with the drawn anticoagulant. Then draw 14 CC blood under complete aseptic condition into a 20 CC syringe. Swing the syringe slowly to mix blood and anticoagulant well. Inject the blood slowly into the Ycellbio tube. Straighten the tube when the blood reaches the Y-funnel. Inject the blood into the Ycellbiotube to the appropriate level as indicated by the lines. Close the Ycellbio tube with silicon stopper using a forceps. Centrifuge at 3500 RPM at time 5 min. After the 5 min. spin, the Buffy coat is well visible. Twist the controller to adjust the height of buffy coat to the marked line. Twist the controller to adjust the height of buffy coat to the marked line. Prepare a 18 G ½ needle and a 3 CC syringe for PRP harvest. Open the silicone stopper using an alcohol soaked cotton. Extract 2.0 CC PRP while slowly swirling the needle in the area of the PRP into a 3 CC syringe. The same process is done for another 3 blood samples to have a total of 8 ml PRP to be used for both ovaries. In the last step, the volume immediately above the erythrocyte layer will be collected. Calcium gluconate in conc. 1:9 will be used as an activator. After activation, in a period less than 2 min, approximately 4 ml of the PRP will be injected into each ovary by TVUS. Monitoring & follow up: The changes in the hormones at day 3 of the menstrual cycle: FSH, LH, estradiol, AMH will be closely monitored,after the application of the procedure in each group after 3 months. The investigators will also monitor the number of antral follicles & changes in the menstrual cycles & spontaneous ovulation before and after 3 months.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALplatelet rich plasma

blood will be withdrawn from the patient then separation of the platelet rich layer and then injection in the ovary

DRUGNormal saline

0.9% normal saline will be injected in each ovary

Sponsors

Hawaa Fertility Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Ahmed Saad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

60 patients with premature ovarian failure will be divided into 2 groups. The group A consists of 30 patients, who will receive a PRP (autologous platelet-rich plasma injection) with activation with calcium chloride. The group B consists of 30 patients, who will receive a normal saline inj. 0.9% Nacl.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* PORs who meet at least two of the following three Bologna criteria * AMH: 0.1-1 ng/ml.

Exclusion criteria

* ovarian insufficiency due to gonadal dysgenesis and - * chromosomal abnormalities, * immunoglobulin A deficiency, * the use of anticoagulants, * psychotropic medicaments, * psychiatric disorders, * carcinomas or * a history of chronic pelvic pain. * Women with present infection, * haemoglobin lower than 11 g/L or * platelets lower than 150 x 10ʒ/μL were excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FSH hormonal changes3rd day of the 3rd menstrual cycle after the procedureThe changes in the hormones at day 3 of the menstrual cycle: FSH monitored
vaginal ultrasound monitoring of the ovaries3rd day of the 3rd menstrual cycle after the proceduremonitor the number of antral follicles.
clinical follow up3rd day of the 3rd menstrual cycle after the procedurechanges in the menstrual cycle by history taking & questionnaire
LH hormonal changes3rd day of the 3rd menstrual cycle after the procedureserum LH at day 3 of the menstrual cycle
E2 hormonal changes3rd day of the 3rd menstrual cycle after the procedureserum E2 at day 3 of the menstrual cycle
AMH hormonal changes3rd day of the 3rd menstrual cycle after the procedureserum AMH

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed S Saad, phd, MD
drahmedsaad@live.com01221709989
Backup ContactMohamed F Elsherbiny, phd.MD
mohfarag171@gmail.com01094070920

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026