Skip to content

Bisphosphonate Use to Mitigate Bone Loss Secondary to Bariatric Surgery

Bisphosphonate Use to Mitigate Bone Loss Secondary to Bariatric Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04922333
Enrollment
200
Registered
2021-06-10
Start date
2023-03-28
Completion date
2028-04-30
Last updated
2026-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Loss

Keywords

bariatric surgery, bisphosphonate, mitigate bone loss

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to see whether receiving a bisphosphonate medication called risedronate can reduce bone and muscle loss following bariatric surgery. Participation will involve up to 6 study visits and last about 1 year. Risedronate is a medication that prevents bone breakdown and has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in older men and women. However, risedronate has not been approved for the prevention of bone and muscle loss following vertical sleeve gastrectomy. Participation in this study will involve completing two visits before beginning the intervention. Participants who qualify will be scheduled to begin the intervention program which will involve taking 6 monthly doses of a risedronate or placebo pill. Participants will then receive monthly contacts by study staff during this time to remind participants to take the intervention pill and ask about any adverse events. After the completion of intervention period, participants will complete up to 4 follow up study visits at 6 months (2 visits) and at 12 months (2 visits).

Detailed description

The main objective of the proposed study is to definitively test whether risedronate use can effectively counter SG associated bone loss. To do this, we propose to randomize 120 middle-aged and older (≥40 years) SG patients to six months of risedronate or placebo treatment, with musculoskeletal outcomes assessed at baseline, six, and 12 months. Due to its robust change following SG and clinical utility in predicting fracture, our primary outcome is change in total hip areal (a)BMD measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This will be complemented by DXA-acquired aBMD assessment at other skeletal sites and appendicular lean mass, as well as quantitative computed tomography (QCT) derived changes in bone (volumetric BMD, cortical thickness, and strength) and muscle (cross sectional area, fat infiltration) at the hip and spine, and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) derived changes in bone microarchitecture, density, and strength at the tibia and radius - allowing for novel assessment of intervention effectiveness on several state-of-the-art bioimaging metrics. Select measures of muscle function (fast 400-m walk, stair climb, knee extensor strength) are also included as proxies of fall risk. Finally, biomarkers of bone turnover (CTX, P1NP), bone-muscle crosstalk (TGF-β, RANKL, myostatin), and gut hormones (ghrelin, PYY, GLP-1) will be assessed in a tertiary aim, providing mechanistic insight into intervention-related changes to the bone-muscle unit. Thus, we aim to: Aim 1: Determine the effect of risedronate compared to placebo on 12-month change from baseline in total hip aBMD following SG. We hypothesize that participants assigned to risedronate will better preserve total hip aBMD than participants assigned to placebo. Aim 2: Determine the effects of risedronate compared to placebo on 12-month change from baseline in DXA-acquired aBMD at additional skeletal sites (femoral neck, lumbar spine, distal radius) and appendicular lean mass; QCT-derived measures of bone (volumetric BMD, cortical thickness, and strength) and muscle (cross sectional area, density, fat infiltration) at the hip and spine; HR-pQCT derived measures of bone microarchitecture, density, and strength at the tibia and radius; and muscle function (fast 400-m walk, stair climb, knee extensor strength) following SG. We hypothesize that participants assigned to risedronate will yield greater preservation/improvement in all secondary metrics than participants assigned to placebo. Aim 3: Investigate the impact of treatment group assignment on biomarkers of bone turnover, bone-muscle crosstalk, and gut hormones to elucidate mechanisms underlying change in bone and muscle quantity and quality.

Interventions

DRUGRisedronate

150mg over-encapsulated risedronate

DRUGPlacebo

Capsules containing placebo tablets

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Both participants and study staff will be blinded to treatment allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who have had sleeve gastrectomy * Willing to provide informed consent * Agree to all study procedures and assessments.

Exclusion criteria

* Weight greater than 450 lbs * Regular use of growth hormones, oral steroids, or prescription osteoporosis medications; * Known allergies to bisphosphonates * Unstable gastric reflux requiring two or more additional doses per month of anti-reflux medication. * Current participation in other research study * Unable to provide own transportation to study visits * Unable to position on scanner independently.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Total Hip Areal Bone Mineral Density (aBMD)baseline through Month 6Acquired through DXA scans.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
QCT-acquired Thigh Muscle Density MeasurementBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
QCT-acquired Thigh Fat Infiltration MeasurementBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
QCT-acquired Mid-Thigh Cross-Sectional Area (CSA) MeasurementBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA)-acquired Femoral Neck MeasurementsBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
DXA-acquired Lumbar Spine MeasurementsBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
DXA-acquired Distal Radius Areal BMD MeasurementsBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
DXA-acquired Appendicular Lean Mass MeasurementsBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Acquired Compartmental Volumetric BMD (hip) MeasurementBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
QCT-acquired Compartmental Volumetric BMD (Spine) MeasurementBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
QCT-acquired Cortical Thickness (Hip) MeasurementBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
QCT-acquired Finite Element (FE) Strength (Hip) MeasurementBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Physical Function Measurement (Fast Walk)Baseline, Month 6, Month 12Fast-paced gait speed will be assessed using the fast 400 meter walk test. Participants will be asked to walk 10 laps of a 40 meter course (20 meters out and 20 meters back) as fast as possible and are given a maximum of 15 minutes to complete the test.
QCT-acquired Trunk Muscle Cross-Sectional Area (CSA) MeasurementBaseline, Month 6, Month 12
Physical Function Measurement (Stair Climb)Baseline, Month 6, Month 12Stair climbing ability will be assessed by using the participant's fastest time achieved to climb 12 steps in two trials. Both tests are sensitive to intensive weight loss and predictive of fall risk.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTKristen Beavers, PhD, MPH, RD
beaverkm@wfu.edu336-758-5855
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKristen Beavers, PhD, MPH, RD

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJamy Ard, MD

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026