Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Children With Atopic Dermatitis (TRuE-AD3)

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by a Long-Term Safety Extension Period in Children (Ages≥ 2 Years to < 12 Years) With Atopic Dermatitis ((TRuE-AD3)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04921969
Enrollment
330
Registered
2021-06-10
Start date
2021-07-19
Completion date
2024-04-08
Last updated
2025-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

Atopic Dermatitis, Ruxolitinib

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream in children with Atopic Dermatitis. This is a randomized, double-blind, Vehicle Controlled study. Participants will be randomized 2:2:1 to blinded treatment with ruxolitinib cream 0.75% ,1.5% , or vehicle cream, with stratification by baseline IGA score and age. At Week 8, efficacy will be evaluated. Participants who complete Week 8 assessments with no additional safety concerns will continue into the 44-week Long Term Safety (LTS) period with the same treatment regimen, except those initially randomized to vehicle cream will be rerandomized (1:1) in a blinded manner to 1 of the 2 active treatment groups (ruxolitinib cream 0.75% or 1.5%).

Interventions

DRUGRuxolitinib

The study cream will be applied topically twice a day for up to 52 weeks.

DRUGVehicle Cream

Matching vehicle cream will be applied topically twice a day for up to 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Incyte Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants diagnosed with Atopic Dermatitis (AD) as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka criteria. * Participants with AD duration of at least 3 months (participant/parent/guardian may verbally report signs and symptoms of AD with onset at least 3 months prior). * Participants with IGA score of 2 to 3 at the screening and baseline visits. * Participants with %BSA (excluding scalp) of AD involvement of 3% to 20% at screening and baseline visits. * For children aged 6 years to \< 12 years, baseline itch NRS score ≥ 4. * Participants/guardians who agree to discontinue all agents used by the participant to treat AD from the screening visit through the final safety follow-up visit. * Participants with at least 1 target lesion that measures at least 5 cm2 at the screening and baseline visits. The target lesion must be representative of the participant's disease state but not located on the hands, feet, or genitalia. * Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering a child for the duration of study participation.

Exclusion criteria

* An unstable course of AD (spontaneously improving or rapidly deteriorating) as determined by the investigator over the previous 4 weeks before the baseline visit. * Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases as follows: 1. Immunocompromised 2. Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the baseline visit. 3. Active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection within 1 week before the baseline visit. 4. Any other concomitant skin disorder, pigmentation, or extensive scarring that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the evaluation of AD lesions or compromise participant safety. 5. Presence of AD lesions only on the hands or feet without prior history of involvement of other classic areas of involvement such as the face or the flexural folds. 6. Other types of eczema. 7. Chronic asthma requiring more than 880 µg of inhaled budesonide or equivalent high dose of other inhaled corticosteroids. * Any serious illness or medical, physical, or psychiatric condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with full participation in the study, including administration of study drug and attending required study visits; pose a significant risk to the participant; or interfere with interpretation of study data. * Use of any of the following treatments within the indicated washout period before the baseline visit: 1. 5 half-lives or 12 weeks, whichever is longer - biologic agents (eg, dupilumab). 2. 4 weeks - systemic corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic hormone analogues, cyclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, or other systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (eg, mycophenolate or tacrolimus). 3. 2 weeks - immunizations with activated vaccines; sedating antihistamines unless on a long-term stable regimen (nonsedating antihistamines are permitted). Note: Live vaccines are not recommended during the VC period. 4. 1 week - use of topical treatments for AD (other than bland emollients, eg, Aveeno® creams, ointments, sprays, soap substitutes), such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, PDE4 inhibitors, coal tar (shampoo), topical antibiotics, or antibacterial cleansing body wash/soap. Note: Diluted sodium hypochlorite bleach baths are allowed as long as they do not exceed 2 baths per week. * Participants who have previously received JAK inhibitors, systemic or topical. -Ultraviolet light therapy or prolonged exposure to natural or artificial sources of UV radiation (eg, sunlight or tanning booth) within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit and/or intention to have such exposure during the study, which is thought by the investigator to potentially impact the participant's AD.- * Positive serology test results at screening for HIV antibody. * Current treatment or treatment within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before the baseline visit with another investigational medication or current enrollment in another investigational drug protocol. * In the opinion of the investigator, unable or unlikely to comply with the administration schedule and study evaluations. * Employees of the sponsor or investigator or otherwise dependents of them.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 8Baseline to Week 8The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with ≥2 grade improvement from Baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 8Baseline to Week 8The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting the number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 7 (Week 1)Baseline to Day 7 (Week 1)The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting the number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 3Baseline to Day 3The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting the number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
VC Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)from Baseline up to Week 8An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it was considered drug related. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up.
LTS Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAEFrom Week 8 up to Week 56An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it was considered drug related. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up.
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Week 2 and 4Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
LTS Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAEFrom Week 12 up to Week 56A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up. The severity of AEs will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with ≥2 grade improvement from Baseline.
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 8The EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of ≥8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l), each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72; the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI75 responder was defined as a participant achieving 75% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.
VC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2 or 4 Pointsup to Week 8The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. Kaplan-Meier estimation method was used for analyses.
VC Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAEfrom Baseline up to Week 8A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up. The severity of AEs will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 330 participants were enrolled at 48 study centers in the United States and Canada.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who completed Week 8 assessments of the Vehicle-controlled (VC) Period with no safety concerns continued in the 44-week Long-term Safety (LTS) Period. Participants who were on active treatment during the VC Period continued with the same treatment regimen in the LTS Period, and those who applied vehicle cream during the VC Period were equally randomized into 1 of the 2 active treatment groups (ruxolitinib 0.75%, ruxolitinib 1.5%) cream during the LTS Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BID
Participants received ruxolitinib matching vehicle cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film twice daily (BID) 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved.
65
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID
Participants received ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved.
134
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID
Participants received ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved.
131
Total330

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006
LTS Period (Weeks 8 to 52)Adverse Event0000001
LTS Period (Weeks 8 to 52)Follow-up Not Performed per Protocol0000033
LTS Period (Weeks 8 to 52)Lack of Efficacy0001032
LTS Period (Weeks 8 to 52)Lost to Follow-up00016189
LTS Period (Weeks 8 to 52)Non-compliance with Study Drug0001001
LTS Period (Weeks 8 to 52)Physician Decision0001011
LTS Period (Weeks 8 to 52)Protocol-specified Withdrawal Criterion Met0001012
LTS Period (Weeks 8 to 52)Withdrawal by Subject000232218
VC Period (Day 1 to Week 8)Adverse Event0110000
VC Period (Day 1 to Week 8)Lack of Efficacy2000000
VC Period (Day 1 to Week 8)Lost to Follow-up2550000
VC Period (Day 1 to Week 8)Physician Decision0110000
VC Period (Day 1 to Week 8)Protocol-specified Withdrawal Criterion Met3200000
VC Period (Day 1 to Week 8)Protocol Violation0010000
VC Period (Day 1 to Week 8)Withdrawal by Subject9580000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDTotal
Age, Continuous6.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.12
6.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83
6.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.94
6.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.93
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American/Black, Hispanic, and Caucasian/White
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American-Indian/Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants11 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African-American
19 Participants45 Participants42 Participants106 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black and Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American and White
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Brazilian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Captured as Hispanic or Latino in Database
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caregiver Did Not Identify
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian and North African
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants32 Participants42 Participants100 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed, Black
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
39 Participants99 Participants89 Participants227 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Portuguese
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Puerto Rican
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
37 Participants75 Participants68 Participants180 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants73 Participants68 Participants179 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants61 Participants63 Participants151 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 1590 / 154
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 6550 / 15949 / 154
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 650 / 1593 / 154

Outcome results

Primary

VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 8

The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with ≥2 grade improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants who were randomized to the study. Treatment groups for this population were defined according to the treatment assignment at the time of randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 810.8 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 836.6 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 856.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.000195% CI: [1.951, 13.315]Exact Logistic Regression
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [4.429, 30.042]Exact Logistic Regression
Secondary

LTS Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE

A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up. The severity of AEs will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.

Time frame: From Week 12 up to Week 56

Population: LTS Evaluable Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDLTS Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE0 Participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDLTS Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE0 Participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDLTS Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE3 Participants
LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDLTS Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE3 Participants
Secondary

LTS Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it was considered drug related. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up.

Time frame: From Week 8 up to Week 56

Population: LTS Evaluable Population: all participants who applied study drug at least once during the LTS Period

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDLTS Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE9 Participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDLTS Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE13 Participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDLTS Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE57 Participants
LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDLTS Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE63 Participants
Secondary

VC Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE

A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up. The severity of AEs will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated; Grade 5: fatal.

Time frame: from Baseline up to Week 8

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE0 Participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE0 Participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE2 Participants
Secondary

VC Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it was considered drug related. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study cream. A TEAE is defined as any AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug until the end of the safety follow-up.

Time frame: from Baseline up to Week 8

Population: Safety Population: all randomized participants who applied ruxolitinib cream or vehicle cream at least once. Treatment groups for this population were determined according to the actual treatment the participant applied on Day 1.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)18 Participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)35 Participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)48 Participants
Secondary

VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

The EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of ≥8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l), each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72; the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI75 responder was defined as a participant achieving 75% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Week 412.3 percentage of participants
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Week 26.2 percentage of participants
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Week 815.4 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Week 453.0 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Week 235.8 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Week 851.5 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Week 243.5 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Week 867.2 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Weeks 2, 4, and 8Week 462.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4

The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with ≥2 grade improvement from Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4Week 24.6 percentage of participants
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4Week 412.3 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4Week 224.6 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4Week 436.6 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4Week 235.1 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4Week 448.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 3

The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting the number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 3

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who were at least 6 years of age and had a Baseline Itch NRS Score ≥4 were included in the analysis. Missing Day 3 Itch scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors, Baseline, and post-Baseline Day 1 to Day 7 Itch NRS Score as predicators.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 34.1 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 314.6 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 312.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 7 (Week 1)

The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting the number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 7 (Week 1)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who were at least 6 years of age and had a Baseline Itch NRS Score ≥4 were included in the analysis. Missing Day 7 Itch scores were imputed by Multiple Imputation with Fully Conditional Specification. The multiple imputation method used treatment and observed stratification factors, Baseline, and post-Baseline Day 1 to Day 7 Itch NRS Score as predicators.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 7 (Week 1)11.5 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 7 (Week 1)23.5 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Day 7 (Week 1)28.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Week 2 and 4

The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who were at least 6 years of age and had a Baseline Itch NRS Score ≥4 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Week 2 and 4Week 28.1 percentage of participants
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Week 2 and 4Week 410.8 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Week 2 and 4Week 223.8 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Week 2 and 4Week 433.8 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Week 2 and 4Week 223.7 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Week 2 and 4Week 436.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 8

The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants were asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting the number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who were at least 6 years of age and had a Baseline Itch NRS Score ≥4 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 829.7 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 837.5 percentage of participants
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Point Improvement in Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 843.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.419895% CI: [0.61, 3.268]Exact Logistic Regression
p-value: 0.168595% CI: [0.779, 4.174]Exact Logistic Regression
Secondary

VC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2 or 4 Points

The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. Kaplan-Meier estimation method was used for analyses.

Time frame: up to Week 8

Population: ITT Population. Participants who were at least 6 years of age and had a Baseline Itch NRS score ≥2 (for assessment of improvement of at least 2 points) or ≥4 (for assessment of improvement of at least 4 points), a daily Itch NRS assessment during the VC Period, and available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2 or 4 PointsImprovement of at least 2 points6.0 days
VC Period: Vehicle Cream BIDVC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2 or 4 PointsImprovement of at least 4 points23.0 days
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2 or 4 PointsImprovement of at least 2 points4.0 days
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDVC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2 or 4 PointsImprovement of at least 4 points11.0 days
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2 or 4 PointsImprovement of at least 2 points5.0 days
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDVC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2 or 4 PointsImprovement of at least 4 points13.0 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026