Skip to content

Serious Game-based Interventions in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment Outside the Clinic

Towards the Development of a Mobile-health Technology Designed to Encourage the Use of Serious Game-based Interventions in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment Outside the Clinic

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04920123
Enrollment
19
Registered
2021-06-09
Start date
2022-02-17
Completion date
2025-03-31
Last updated
2025-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Neuro-World cognitive training games (Woorisoft, S. Korea) in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Detailed description

This study will be a cross-over randomized controlled trial. Fifty participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to group A or group B. Group A will self-administer Neuro-World cognitive training games for 30 minutes a day, twice a week for 12 weeks in the home setting (i.e., intervention period). For the following 12 weeks, the participants will not engage in any therapist-supervised cognitive therapies (i.e., no-intervention period). Group B will not engage in any therapist-supervised cognitive therapies (i.e., no-intervention period). For the following 12 weeks, the participants will self-administer Neuro-World cognitive training games for 30 minutes a day, twice a week in the home setting (i.e., intervention period). All the participants in both groups will receive phone calls twice a week to 1) provide feedback on their adherence to Neuro-World cognitive training (during the intervention period) and 2) learn any significant changes in the level of their daily activities (during the no-intervention period and the intervention period).

Interventions

DEVICENeuro-World

Neuro-World is a collection of six games that are developed for cognitive training that focuses on memory and attention.

Sponsors

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
CollaboratorOTHER
Université de Montréal
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Seventeen points or greater and smaller than twenty-six points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) * Fifty-five years old and above * Minimal technological literacy (i.e. ability to use a tablet independently) * Having a computer for online videoconferencing-based communication (necessary for online cognitive assessments)

Exclusion criteria

* Confounding neurological and psychiatric disorders * History of traumatic brain injury * Clinically known hearing or vision impairment * Severe upper-limb motor impairments that could impact the use of mobile devices * Clinical presentations suggestive of dementia with Lewy bodies, progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, or vascular parkinsonism * Diagnosis of dementia * Major depression * Any significant upper-limb impairment that could affect tablet use * Participation in any other therapist-supervised cognitive training

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)12 weeksMoCA scores range between 0 and 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function. The change in MoCA scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Digit Forward Span (DFS)12 weeksDFS scores range between 0 and 14. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function. The change in DFS scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Digit Backward Span (DBS)12 weeksDBS scores range between 0 and 14. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function. The change in DBS scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)12 weeksMMSE scores range between 0 and 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function. The change in MMSE scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary Score12 weeksSF-36 consists of eight health domains, each scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more favorable health states. In this study, we report the Mental Component Summary (MCS) score, a norm-based composite score derived from relevant mental health domains. The MCS is standardized to a mean of 50 (SD = 10) in the general U.S. population, where higher scores reflect better mental well-being. The change in SF-36 MCS scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks.
Change in Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)12 weeksIADL scores range between 0 and 8. Higher scores indicate greater levels of performance in activities of daily living. The change in IADL scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)12 weeksGDS scores range between 0 and 15. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. The change in GDS scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited remotely across the United States and Canada through email, phone, and social media. Of the 155 individuals contacted, 41 were screened for eligibility via videoconference. Fifteen met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Three participants later discontinued participation.

Pre-assignment details

Fifteen participants were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Three participants discontinued participation during the study. No significant events such as washout or run-in periods occurred prior to group assignment. Four caregivers were enrolled to assist with technical arrangements and help manage study logistics. Two caregivers discontinued participation during the study after the participants they were assisting withdrew.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: Intervention, Then Non-intervention
Group A will self-administer Neuro-World cognitive training games for 30 minutes per day, twice a week, for 12 weeks in a home setting (intervention period). This will be followed by 12 weeks without any therapist-supervised cognitive therapies (non-intervention period).
8
Group B: Non-intervention, Then Intervention
Group B will first complete a 12-week non-intervention period without therapist-supervised cognitive therapies. This will be followed by 12 weeks of self-administered Neuro-World cognitive training games for 30 minutes per day, twice a week, in a home setting (intervention period).
7
Caregivers
Caregivers are optionally enrolled to assist with technical arrangements and help manage study logistics. No interventions are administered to the caregiver group.
4
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
First Intervention (12 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject212

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup A: Intervention, Then Non-interventionTotalCaregiversGroup B: Non-intervention, Then Intervention
Age, Continuous63.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
62.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
48.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
57.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants15 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants13 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 Participants19 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants10 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants9 Participants4 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 120 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

MoCA scores range between 0 and 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function. The change in MoCA scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Game InterventionChange in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.24
No InterventionChange in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
Comparison: Null hypothesis: no improvement or worse with intervention Alternative hypothesis: improvement with interventionp-value: 0.997t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change in Digit Backward Span (DBS)

DBS scores range between 0 and 14. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function. The change in DBS scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Game InterventionChange in Digit Backward Span (DBS)-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
No InterventionChange in Digit Backward Span (DBS)1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Comparison: Null hypothesis: no improvement or worse with intervention Alternative hypothesis: improvement with interventionp-value: 0.995t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change in Digit Forward Span (DFS)

DFS scores range between 0 and 14. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function. The change in DFS scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Game InterventionChange in Digit Forward Span (DFS)-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
No InterventionChange in Digit Forward Span (DFS)0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
Comparison: Null hypothesis: no improvement or worse with intervention Alternative hypothesis: improvement with interventionp-value: 0.821t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)

GDS scores range between 0 and 15. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. The change in GDS scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Game InterventionChange in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
No InterventionChange in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Comparison: Null hypothesis: no improvement or worse with intervention Alternative hypothesis: improvement with interventionp-value: 0.076t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change in Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)

IADL scores range between 0 and 8. Higher scores indicate greater levels of performance in activities of daily living. The change in IADL scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Game InterventionChange in Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
No InterventionChange in Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL)-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
p-value: 0.75t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

MMSE scores range between 0 and 30. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function. The change in MMSE scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Game InterventionChange in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
No InterventionChange in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Comparison: Null hypothesis: no improvement or worse with intervention Alternative hypothesis: improvement with interventionp-value: 0.5t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary Score

SF-36 consists of eight health domains, each scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more favorable health states. In this study, we report the Mental Component Summary (MCS) score, a norm-based composite score derived from relevant mental health domains. The MCS is standardized to a mean of 50 (SD = 10) in the general U.S. population, where higher scores reflect better mental well-being. The change in SF-36 MCS scores was measured from baseline to 12 weeks.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Game InterventionChange in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary Score-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.68
No InterventionChange in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary Score0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.18
Comparison: Null hypothesis: no improvement or worse with intervention Alternative hypothesis: improvement with interventionp-value: 0.432t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026