Skip to content

Process and Outcomes of Horticultural Therapy for People With Disabilities

Examining the Process and Outcomes of Horticultural Therapy for People With Severe Mental Illness, Intellectual, and Multiple Disabilities

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04917666
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-06-08
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2021-01-29
Last updated
2021-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Disorders, Severe, Intellectual Disability

Keywords

horticultural therapy, severe mental illness, care home residents

Brief summary

Horticultural therapy (HT) is the engagement of a client in horticulture activities facilitated by a trained therapist to achieve specific and documented treatment goals (American Horticultural Therapy Association, 2012). People's interactions with plants, through goal-orientated horticultural activities in the form of active gardening, as well as the passive appreciation of nature, could be therapeutic to people with mental or intellectual disabilities in many ways (Eling, 2006; Parkinson, Lowe, & Vecsey, 2011). This study aims to conduct evaluation studies of HT group programmes for care home residents with severe mental illness.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, single-blind, controlled study in which the outcomes of the horticultural therapy program is compared with a comparison group. Outcome measures were compared at Pre-intervention and post-intervention.

Interventions

A structured 8-session group therapy program, in which participants learn about plants, green spaces, plant-human interactions. During the program, the participants are guided by therapist to grow or take care of both indoor and outdoor plants, do small horticulture projects (like cooking, making drinks, herb projects).

4 session of semi-structured and free engagement in activities of their choice. The activities that they could choose are mostly table-top activities which are solitary in nature, and does not require social interaction.

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcome assessors have no knowledge of whether the participants are in the treatment of control groups. They distribute and collect questionnaires from participants, and gave observation rating on the participants in both group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of severe mental disorder, e.g. schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder. * age 18 - 65. * care home resident

Exclusion criteria

* organic brain disorder * difficulties in communication for joining horticultural activity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mental Well-beingPre-test, Postest (8 weeks from pre-test), Change from Pretest to Posttest is assessedChinese Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (C-SWEMWBS). The C-SWEMWBS uses a five-point Likert scale. The average scores for the scale ranges between 1 and 5, and a higher score indicates better mental well-being.
Change in Engagement in Meaningful Activity Scale (EMAS)Pre-test, Postest (8 weeks from pre-test), Change from Pretest to Posttest is assessedEngagement in Meaningful Activity Scale (EMAS). The EMAS has 12 items measured on a four-point Likert scale. The average score for the scale is 1- 4 and a higher score indicates higher engagement.
Change in Perceived Benefits of Horticultural TherapyPre-test, Postest (8 weeks from pre-test), Change from Pretest to Posttest is assessedThis is a opinion survey developed by the clinical setting to collect participants' attitude toward horticultural therapy. It has 7 items and participants are asked to respond using a five-point scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The average score ranges from 1 to 5, and a higher score indicates that the participant perceived the benefits of horticulture therapy as higher.

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026