Skip to content

The Effect of NMES on Bowel Management in People with Chronic SCI

The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Bowel Management in People with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury - a Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04914975
Acronym
FES_Bowel
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-06-07
Start date
2021-07-04
Completion date
2024-10-30
Last updated
2024-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bowel Dysfunction, Defecation Disorder, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

Spinal Cord Injuries, Electrical Stimulation, Bowel Management, Transit Time, Incontinence, Quality of Life

Brief summary

It has been reported that 62% of all people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) have experienced faecal incontinence and that neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is a major sequela. As an alternative to abdominal massage or the use of suppositories, the electrical stimulation (ES) of the abdominal wall has been shown to be effective in decreasing the bowel transit time as well as decreasing constipation in children with slow-transit constipation. Due to the intrinsic nature of the guts' innervation, we expect to reproduce these positive effects in people with SCI through administration of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES).

Detailed description

A SCI entails devastating changes to a person's life. The extent of these changes depends on the level and degree of the lesion. NBD is one of the most important sequelae occurring in the majority of people with a SCI. It has been reported that 62% of people with SCI had experienced faecal incontinence . In fact, NBD is caused by a disruption of the autonomic nervous system leading to a disturbed colonic peristalsis. The enteric nervous system of the intestines is an intrinsic system that can function independently, but it is widely influenced by the autonomic nervous system. As such, its regulation is perturbed because the parasympathetic and the sympathetic nervous systems do modulate it but do not directly control the smooth muscle cells of the bowel . Depending on the level of the lesion, the bowel function can be affected in various ways ranging from constipation to overflow incontinence. Hence, NBD has a major impact on the quality of life of paraplegics and tetraplegics. Not only is there a physical component to it consisting of constipation, haemorrhoids or abdominal distension but these gastrointestinal impairments also have a social aspect. People with SCI often end up avoiding social events and tend to isolate because of the fear of incontinence. The immense expenditure of time for bowel evacuation is a consequence of the dyscoordination of faecal elimination. According to a survey study, 22% of all participants with SCI spend 31 to 60 minutes and 14% more than 60 minutes on bowel care per defecation. For example, people with an upper motor neuron lesion to their bowel are mainly confronted with faecal retention and constipation. Among the methods for bowel evacuation, the application of digital stimulation of the rectum and/or the insertion of a suppository are mostly used. Some people also use abdominal massage just before bowel evacuation . Only a few studies have investigated the effect of ES to the abdominal wall on the defaecation time in people with SCI and an upper motor neuron lesion but none investigated the defecation time in people with SCI with a lesion below the level of Th12. Nevertheless, the results of this therapeutic modality are very promising for different populations such as multiple sclerosis and children with slow-transit constipation by decreasing constipation and increasing transit times respectively. By means of providing a more efficient and reliable method to support people with SCI in their bowel management strategy.A pilot study with a convenience sample of 20 out- and inpatients of the Swiss Paraplegic Centre will be conducted. Patients who have found a good bowel management method for themselves but claim to invest too much time in this routine are eligible for the study. During their participation, they should follow their usual routine after applying ES for 30 minutes before defaecation. Based on the recent findings and clinical experience, it is hypothesized that NMES has the potential to reduce defaecation times as well as the bowel transit time in people with SCI experiencing NBD.

Interventions

OTHERNeuromuscular electrical stimulation

The stimulation will be conducted at home or at the SPC for half an hour about 30 minutes before the usual bowel emptying time. Four adhesive electrodes are attached to the abdominal wall for the neuromuscular electrical stimulation. The abdominal muscles are stimulated in such a way that activation occurs, i.e. the muscle alternately contracts and relaxes again. The stimulation sessions will be documented with a defined protocol. In addition, the stool consistency is rated according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale.

Sponsors

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

repeated measures interventional single subject design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Traumatic and non-traumatic SCI; \> 1 year * Level of lesion: C2 - L5 * AIS score A/B/C/D * Age: ≥ 18 years * Urge to reduce defaecation time

Exclusion criteria

* Patients during primary rehabilitation * Bladder stimulator * Autonomic dysreflexia by application of ES of the abdominal wall * Pregnancy: test in women of childbearing age (15 - 49 years) * Opioid use * Inflammatory bowel disease * Cancerous tissue in abdominal region * Patients' inability to follow the study, e.g. mental-health problems, language problems, dementia etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Score (NBDS) and the defaecation time from the stimulation protocol24 weeksInvestigation of the effect of NMES on the change in defaecation time (minutes) and its relation to the change in NBDS between the follow-up visits and baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corn Test24 weeks; 5 time pointsCorn Test assessing bowel transit time
Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS)24 weeks; at each defaecationBSFS for stool consistency

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualiveen Short Form (SF)24 weeks; 5 timesQualiveen SF to assess bladder function
International Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI)24 weeks; 5 timesInternational Standards to document remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI)
Questionnaire of treatment effectiveness24 weeks; 2 timesQuestionnaire of treatment effectiveness containing 3 questions about the application of the stimulation

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026