Skip to content

GlideSheath Slender® Versus Conventional 5Fr Arterial Sheath in Coronary Angiography Through the Distal Radial Artery

Randomized Comparison of GlideSheath Slender® Versus Conventional 5Fr Arterial Sheath in Coronary Angiography Through the Distal Radial Artery (Anatomical Snuffbox)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04911218
Enrollment
371
Registered
2021-06-02
Start date
2021-05-10
Completion date
2021-12-02
Last updated
2021-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arterial Access, Coronary Angiography, Radial Artery Occlusion

Keywords

arterial access, coronary angiography, radial access, distal radial access, radial artery occlusion

Brief summary

Transradial approach has become the default arterial access for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mainly due to lower incidence of bleeding compared to transfemoral access.1 However, TRA is not deprived of local access site complications such as radial artery occlusion (RAO), occurring in approximately 5.2% of patients, compartment syndrome, pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, and arteriovenous fistula. Recently, a novel approach has been proposed, the access through the distal radial artery (distal transradial access, dTRA), located in the anatomical snuffbox. Initial studies regarding the dRA have shown feasibility and benefits, including shorter hemostasis time, fewer local access site complications and potentially lower incidence of RAO. GlideSheath Slender is a novel sheath which has a hydrophilic coating and is made of a thinner material than traditional sheaths. As a result, the external diameter of the 5 Fr GlideSheath Slender sheath is 1 Fr lower compared with conventional arterial sheaths. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the use of the Slender sheath affects the time of hemostasis, sheath insertion time, crossover rate to conventional radial access, pain associated with the procedure and incidence of local access site complications (RAO, distal radial artery occlusion, fistula, hematoma) in patients undergoing diagnostic angiography through the distal radial artery.

Detailed description

Patients fulfilling the enrollment criteria will be randomized 1:1 to GlideSheath Slender versus conventional 5Fr arterial sheath for access through the distal radial artery (dTRA). In case an interventional procedure is required then the initial sheath will be exchanged to a larger sheath according to the circumstances of the case and the patient will not be included in the analysis. For randomized patients sheath insertion time, necessity for crossover to conventional radial access, pain associated with the procedure (visual pain scale) and occurrence of hematoma will be recorded. Follow-up ultrasound 7-10 days after the procedure for detection of RAO, distal radial artery occlusion and fistula formation will be performed.

Interventions

DEVICEGlideSheath Slender 5Fr arterial sheath

Placement of GlideSheath Slender 5Fr arterial sheath for coronary angiography through the distal radial artery (anatomical snuffbox).

DEVICEConventional 5Fr arterial sheath

Placement of conventional 5Fr arterial sheath for coronary angiography through the distal radial artery (anatomical snuffbox).

Sponsors

University Hospital of Patras
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Indication for coronary angiography * Age\>18 years * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Non-palpable right radial artery * Prior CABG * STEMI * Prior right transaradial intervention within the previous 2 months * Hemodynamic instability * Anatomical restrictions (fistula orthopaedic problems, etc)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of successful hemostasis at 30 minutes after sheath removalAt 30 minutes after sheath removal

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Crossover rate to conventional radial accessDuring the procedure
Pain associated with the procedure (visual analog scale, VAS)During the procedure0-10, 0: no pain, 10: worst pain possible
Rate of hematoma modified EASY class≥IIUp to 24 hours after hemostatic device removal
Rate of forearm radial artery occlusion7-10 days after the coronary angiography
Rate of distal radial artery occlusion7-10 days after the coronary angiography
Rate of fistula formation7-10 days after the coronary angiography
Rate of pseudoaneurysm formation7-10 days after the coronary angiography

Countries

Greece

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026