Skip to content

Electromyographic Calibration Guided by Depth of Anesthesia

Does Calibration of Electromyography Guided by State Entropy Improve Measurement Precision

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04911088
Acronym
CELESTE
Enrollment
66
Registered
2021-06-02
Start date
2022-01-16
Completion date
2023-05-31
Last updated
2026-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuromuscular Blockade

Keywords

electromyography, calibration, residual paralysis

Brief summary

The goal of the CELESTE study is to evaluate whether calibration of EMG is needed for reliable interpretation of neuromuscular function and if so, to identify the minimal necessary depth of anesthesia.

Detailed description

Neuromuscular monitoring is used to document neuromuscular function intra-operatively. Failure to restore neuromuscular function prior to extubation results in residual neuromuscular blockade which is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. It is essential to document baseline neuromuscular function before administration of the neuromuscular blocking agent. However, during anesthesia induction, neuromuscular monitoring is rarely calibrated due to its time-consuming nature coinciding with the patients' loss of consciousness. The CELESTE trial is a randomized, prospective, observational proof-of-concept study. We plan to enroll sixty adult participants scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery requiring general anesthesia with moderate neuromuscular blockade. Participants will be randomized into three electromyography (EMG) calibration groups: based on state entropy ("depth of anesthesia"), group 1 will receive "analgesic calibration", group 2 "sedated calibration", and group 3 "no calibration". Participants will be randomly allocated to receive calibration at a certain depth of anesthesia. All participants will receive a standard EMG performed on the contralateral arm. Standard EMG will be calibrated at state entropy of 50.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital Ulm
Lead SponsorOTHER
Klinikum rechts der Isar Technische Universität München
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* signed informed written consent * BMI 17.5-30 kg/m\^2 * ASA \<= 3 * supine positioning during surgery with intraoperative access to both arms * absence of allergy to muscle relaxants and reversal agents * absence of neuromuscular disease

Exclusion criteria

* ambulatory patients for whom discharge is planned within 12 hours of anaesthesia * patients undergoing minor surgical * procedures scheduled outside the operating room * patients who are endotracheally intubated prior to surgery * pregnancy * indication for rapid sequence induction * patients undergoing arm surgery * patients with preceding injuries impairing muscle or nerve function of the arm (e.g., finger amputation)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Precision of Train-of-four measurementsintraoperativerepeatability coefficient

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tolerance interval of Train-of-four ratiosintraoperative
Agreement of EMG calibration group Train-of-four and standard Train-of-fourintraoperativeAgreement of both calibration group EMG and standard EMG regarding the decision whether complete neuromuscular recovery is given based on a Train-of-four ratio of \>0.9 or \>0.95, respectively.
Time difference between calibration group Train-of-four and standard Train-of-four to complete recoveryintraoperativeTime difference between calibration group EMG and the standard EMG reaching a Train-of-four ratio \>0.9 or \>0.95, respectively.
Recall of calibrationpostoperative day 1
Discomfort with calibrationpostoperative day 1

Countries

Germany

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORManfred Blobner, MD PhD

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 14, 2026