Skip to content

Improving Asthma Care Together (IMPACT): A Shared Management Pilot Study

Improving Asthma Care Together (IMPACT): A Shared Management Pilot Study for Children With Asthma and Their Parents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04908384
Acronym
IMPACT
Enrollment
104
Registered
2021-06-01
Start date
2021-10-01
Completion date
2023-08-15
Last updated
2024-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma in Children

Keywords

Self-management, Shared management, mHealth

Brief summary

This study aims to iteratively develop, refine and test the Improving Asthma Care Together (IMPACT) Intervention for school-age children (7-11 years) with persistent asthma and their parents.

Detailed description

Asthma is one of the most common chronic conditions of childhood, affecting over six million US children. Asthma treatment relies on self-management including symptom monitoring and response, trigger avoidance, and timely and appropriate medication use. Unfortunately, fewer than 50% of children with asthma are adherent to asthma treatment regimens, leading to increased disease morbidity and mortality and potentially irreversible airway damage. Children with asthma are missing a voice in their own care. The school-age years (7-11) represent a natural transition in asthma management, as children must assume some responsibility for asthma-related care while they spend increasing time away from parents at school and other extracurricular activities. Yet, existing interventions focus on parents alone and use prescriptive approaches, telling the parent what to do to the child to manage their asthma. As a result, current strategies are failing to provide children with asthma and their families the tools they need to manage asthma successfully within the realities of their daily lives. Using a Human-Centered Design (HCD) framework, the investigators co-designed a tailored asthma shared management mobile health application that pairs the parent and child together as a team and facilitates the intentional transition of some asthma management to the child. The hypothesis is that by involving children in their own care, participants will improve asthma management in the present, but also establish lifelong successful self-management skills. The objective of the proposed study is to pilot test the Improving Asthma Care Together (IMPACT) mobile health application with parent-child dyads. Based on the preliminary data, the central hypothesis is that IMPACT will be effective for delivering a shared asthma management intervention for children and their parents.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALImproving Asthma Care Together (IMPACT)

IMPACT is a novel health application and wearable device

Sponsors

National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
CollaboratorNIH
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 11 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

CHILD Inclusion Criteria: * Clinician diagnosis of persistent asthma (prescription for daily asthma medication) * Speak English PARENT Inclusion Criteria: * 18 years or older * Child's primary caregiver * Able to understand and read English * Reside with the child 50% or more * Legal guardian who can consent for child to participate * Have access to a smart phone and reliable home internet access * Reported Asthma Responsibility Questionnaire score \< or = 2.5 at screening CHILD

Exclusion criteria

* Parent report of developmental delay (language \< 5 year level) * Co-morbid cancer, diabetes, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) * Current asthma exacerbation at the time of recruitment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Asthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From Baseline to 8 WeeksBaseline and 8 weeks10- items, 5-point scale to report asthma management task responsibility. Total score is the mean of all items calculated. Scores range from 1 to 5, with 1= parent takes responsibility all of the time, 3= parent and child share responsibility about equally, and 5 = child takes responsibility all of the time.
Asthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From 8 to 16 Weeks8 and 16 weeks10- items, 5-point scale to report asthma management task responsibility. Total score is the mean of all items calculated. Scores range from 1 to 5, with 1= parent takes responsibility all of the time, 3= parent and child share responsibility about equally, and 5 = child takes responsibility all of the time.
Asthma Management Self-efficacy Change From Baseline to 8 WeeksBaseline and 8 weeks13-items (parent) and 12-items (child), 5-point scale assesses asthma self-efficacy. Scores are averaged with higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Possible range of 1-5.
Asthma Management Self-efficacy Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks8 and 16 weeks13-items (parent) and 12-items (child), 5-point scale assesses asthma self-efficacy. Scores are averaged and higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Possible score range of 1-5.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Childhood Asthma Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 8 WeeksBaseline and 8 weeksSelf-report child (13 items)- asthma quality of life, scores range from 1-7 per item, a mean of item scores calculated, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Possible score range of 1-7.
Childhood Asthma Quality of Life Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks8 and 16 weeksSelf-report child (13 items)- asthma quality of life, scores range from 1-7 per item, a mean of item scores calculated, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Possible score range of 1-7.
Parent Asthma Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 8 WeeksBaseline and 8 weeksParent/caregiver (13 items)-reported asthma quality of life, scores range from 1-7 per item, a mean of item scores calculated, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Score range of variable, which required exponential transformation for negatively skewed distribution, was 2.72-43.35, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Parent Asthma Quality of Life Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks8 and 16 weeksParent/caregiver (13 items)-reported asthma quality of life, scores range from 1-7 per item, a mean of item scores calculated, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Score range of variable, which required exponential transformation for negatively skewed distribution, was 2.72-345.90, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
Spirometry - FEV1/FVC Change From Baseline to 8 WeeksBaseline and 8 weeksSpirometry - objective measure of expiratory lung function will be used to evaluate asthma control. Specifically, the forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) measure will be used and interpreted according to the national spirometry guideline cutpoints (NAEPP EPR4 report). Scores are presented as a percentage and typically range from 1% to 120% (occasionally higher), with higher scores indicating better asthma control. Note, national asthma guidelines consider \>85% to indicate well controlled asthma.
Medication Adherence Change From Baseline to 8 WeeksBaseline and 8 weeksMedication Adherence Report Scale for Asthma, 10-items, 5-point scale assessing reported child asthma controller medication adherence at baseline and throughout the study. Higher adherence suggests better asthma management. Scores are averaged, ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating better adherence.
Medication Adherence Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks8 and 16 weeksMedication Adherence Report Scale for Asthma, 10-items, 5-point scale assessing reported child asthma controller medication adherence at baseline and throughout the study. Higher adherence suggests better asthma management. Scores are averaged, ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating better adherence.
Feasibility of Intervention (Intervention Group Only)8 weeks4 items (2 for children) using 5-point scale; scores are summed with higher scores indicate higher feasibility. Possible score range of 4-20 for parents, 2-10 for children.
System Usability Scale (Intervention Group Only)8 weeksSystem usability scale - 10 items, 5-point scale to determine perceived usability of a system. To calculate the SUS score, first sum the score contributions from each item. Each item's score contribution will range from 0 to 4. For items 1,3,5,7,and 9 the score contribution is the scale position minus 1. For items 2,4,6,8 and 10, the contribution is 5 minus the scale position. Multiply the sum of the scores by 2.5 to obtain the overall value of SU. Total score may range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher usability. Used only post-intervention.
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (Intervention Groups Only)8 weeks4 items (2 for children) using 5-point scale; scores are summed with higher scores indicate higher acceptability. Possible score range of 4-20 for parents, 2-10 for children.
Spirometry - FEV1/FVC Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks8 and 16 weeksSpirometry - objective measure of expiratory lung function will be used to evaluate asthma control. Specifically, the forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) measure will be used and interpreted according to the national spirometry guideline cutpoints (NAEPP EPR4 report). Scores are presented as a percentage and typically range from 1% to 120% (occasionally higher), with higher scores indicating better asthma control. Note, national asthma guidelines consider \>85% to indicate well controlled asthma.
Childhood Asthma Control Test Change From Baseline to 8 WeeksBaseline and 8 weeks7 total items--3 parent (5-point scale) and 4 child (3-point scale) to assess asthma control. Parent and child scores are summed, possible range of 7-27, with higher scores indicate better control. One total score reported for child participants.
Childhood Asthma Control Test Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks8 and 16 weeks7 total items--3 parent (5-point scale) and 4 child (3-point scale) to assess asthma control. Parent and child scores are summed, possible range of 7-27, with higher scores indicate better control. One total score reported for child participants.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IMPACT Intervention Child Participants
IMPACT health application and wearable device - child participants
21
IMPACT Intervention Parent Participants
IMPACT health application and wearable device - parent participants
21
Usual Care Control Child Participants
Usual care control - child participants
31
Usual Care Control Parent Participants
Usual care control - parent participants
31
Total104

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4400

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIMPACT Intervention Child ParticipantsUsual Care Control Parent ParticipantsIMPACT Intervention Parent ParticipantsUsual Care Control Child ParticipantsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
21 Participants0 Participants0 Participants31 Participants52 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants31 Participants21 Participants0 Participants52 Participants
Asthma Quality of Life5.67 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99
5.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85
5.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.95
5.88 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.57
5.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61
Asthma Responsibility Questionnaire2.74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.55
2.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
2.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.61
2.69 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.54
2.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.51
Childhood asthma control test19.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.19
21.39 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.65
20.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.96
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants6 Participants4 Participants6 Participants21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants25 Participants17 Participants25 Participants83 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Medication Adherence3.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78
4.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79
3.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
3.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants1 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants17 Participants14 Participants15 Participants55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants29 Participants20 Participants17 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants2 Participants1 Participants14 Participants28 Participants
Spirometry - FEV1/FVC85.7 percent of predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
78.6 percent of predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
82.9 percent of predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 210 / 210 / 310 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 210 / 210 / 310 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 210 / 310 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Asthma Management Self-efficacy Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks

13-items (parent) and 12-items (child), 5-point scale assesses asthma self-efficacy. Scores are averaged and higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Possible score range of 1-5.

Time frame: 8 and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupAsthma Management Self-efficacy Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks3.69 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Parent Intervention GroupAsthma Management Self-efficacy Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks4.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Child Control GroupAsthma Management Self-efficacy Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks3.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Parent Control GroupAsthma Management Self-efficacy Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks4.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Primary

Asthma Management Self-efficacy Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks

13-items (parent) and 12-items (child), 5-point scale assesses asthma self-efficacy. Scores are averaged with higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy. Possible range of 1-5.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupAsthma Management Self-efficacy Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks3.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Parent Intervention GroupAsthma Management Self-efficacy Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks4.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Child Control GroupAsthma Management Self-efficacy Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks3.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Parent Control GroupAsthma Management Self-efficacy Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks4.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Primary

Asthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From 8 to 16 Weeks

10- items, 5-point scale to report asthma management task responsibility. Total score is the mean of all items calculated. Scores range from 1 to 5, with 1= parent takes responsibility all of the time, 3= parent and child share responsibility about equally, and 5 = child takes responsibility all of the time.

Time frame: 8 and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupAsthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From 8 to 16 Weeks2.88 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Parent Intervention GroupAsthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From 8 to 16 Weeks2.63 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Child Control GroupAsthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From 8 to 16 Weeks2.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Parent Control GroupAsthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From 8 to 16 Weeks2.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Primary

Asthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks

10- items, 5-point scale to report asthma management task responsibility. Total score is the mean of all items calculated. Scores range from 1 to 5, with 1= parent takes responsibility all of the time, 3= parent and child share responsibility about equally, and 5 = child takes responsibility all of the time.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupAsthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks2.72 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Parent Intervention GroupAsthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks2.72 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Child Control GroupAsthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks2.79 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Parent Control GroupAsthma Responsibility Questionnaire Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks2.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Secondary

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (Intervention Groups Only)

4 items (2 for children) using 5-point scale; scores are summed with higher scores indicate higher acceptability. Possible score range of 4-20 for parents, 2-10 for children.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Child max score of 10; parent max score of 20

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupAcceptability of Intervention Measure (Intervention Groups Only)8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Parent Intervention GroupAcceptability of Intervention Measure (Intervention Groups Only)14.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.62
Secondary

Childhood Asthma Control Test Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks

7 total items--3 parent (5-point scale) and 4 child (3-point scale) to assess asthma control. Parent and child scores are summed, possible range of 7-27, with higher scores indicate better control. One total score reported for child participants.

Time frame: 8 and 16 weeks

Population: Scale uses a combination of child and parent participants scores for an overall asthma control score. Overall scores reported under child participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupChildhood Asthma Control Test Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks12.93 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Parent Intervention GroupChildhood Asthma Control Test Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks12.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
Secondary

Childhood Asthma Control Test Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks

7 total items--3 parent (5-point scale) and 4 child (3-point scale) to assess asthma control. Parent and child scores are summed, possible range of 7-27, with higher scores indicate better control. One total score reported for child participants.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Scale uses a combination of child and parent participants scores for an overall asthma control score. Overall scores reported under child participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupChildhood Asthma Control Test Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks12.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Parent Intervention GroupChildhood Asthma Control Test Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks12.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Secondary

Childhood Asthma Quality of Life Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks

Self-report child (13 items)- asthma quality of life, scores range from 1-7 per item, a mean of item scores calculated, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Possible score range of 1-7.

Time frame: 8 and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupChildhood Asthma Quality of Life Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks5.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Parent Intervention GroupChildhood Asthma Quality of Life Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks5.98 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Secondary

Childhood Asthma Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks

Self-report child (13 items)- asthma quality of life, scores range from 1-7 per item, a mean of item scores calculated, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Possible score range of 1-7.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupChildhood Asthma Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks5.74 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Parent Intervention GroupChildhood Asthma Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks5.97 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Secondary

Feasibility of Intervention (Intervention Group Only)

4 items (2 for children) using 5-point scale; scores are summed with higher scores indicate higher feasibility. Possible score range of 4-20 for parents, 2-10 for children.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: child score max of 10; parent max score of 20

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupFeasibility of Intervention (Intervention Group Only)8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Parent Intervention GroupFeasibility of Intervention (Intervention Group Only)14.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.36
Secondary

Medication Adherence Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks

Medication Adherence Report Scale for Asthma, 10-items, 5-point scale assessing reported child asthma controller medication adherence at baseline and throughout the study. Higher adherence suggests better asthma management. Scores are averaged, ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating better adherence.

Time frame: 8 and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupMedication Adherence Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks3.32 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Parent Intervention GroupMedication Adherence Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks3.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Child Control GroupMedication Adherence Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks3.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.48
Parent Control GroupMedication Adherence Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks3.65 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Secondary

Medication Adherence Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks

Medication Adherence Report Scale for Asthma, 10-items, 5-point scale assessing reported child asthma controller medication adherence at baseline and throughout the study. Higher adherence suggests better asthma management. Scores are averaged, ranging from 1-5, with higher scores indicating better adherence.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupMedication Adherence Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks3.20 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Parent Intervention GroupMedication Adherence Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks3.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Child Control GroupMedication Adherence Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks3.70 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Parent Control GroupMedication Adherence Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks3.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Secondary

Parent Asthma Quality of Life Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks

Parent/caregiver (13 items)-reported asthma quality of life, scores range from 1-7 per item, a mean of item scores calculated, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Score range of variable, which required exponential transformation for negatively skewed distribution, was 2.72-345.90, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

Time frame: 8 and 16 weeks

Population: Means and SEs for this variable reflect an exponential transformation to compensate for a negatively skewed distribution in the raw variable.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupParent Asthma Quality of Life Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks12.85 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.29
Parent Intervention GroupParent Asthma Quality of Life Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks17.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 10.99
Secondary

Parent Asthma Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks

Parent/caregiver (13 items)-reported asthma quality of life, scores range from 1-7 per item, a mean of item scores calculated, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Score range of variable, which required exponential transformation for negatively skewed distribution, was 2.72-43.35, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Population: Means and SEs for this variable reflect an exponential transformation to compensate for a negatively skewed distribution in the raw variable.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupParent Asthma Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks11.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Parent Intervention GroupParent Asthma Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks7.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.27
Secondary

Spirometry - FEV1/FVC Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks

Spirometry - objective measure of expiratory lung function will be used to evaluate asthma control. Specifically, the forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) measure will be used and interpreted according to the national spirometry guideline cutpoints (NAEPP EPR4 report). Scores are presented as a percentage and typically range from 1% to 120% (occasionally higher), with higher scores indicating better asthma control. Note, national asthma guidelines consider \>85% to indicate well controlled asthma.

Time frame: 8 and 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupSpirometry - FEV1/FVC Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks85.38 percentage of predictedStandard Error 2.42
Parent Intervention GroupSpirometry - FEV1/FVC Change From 8 Weeks to 16 Weeks81.82 percentage of predictedStandard Error 1.73
Secondary

Spirometry - FEV1/FVC Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks

Spirometry - objective measure of expiratory lung function will be used to evaluate asthma control. Specifically, the forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) measure will be used and interpreted according to the national spirometry guideline cutpoints (NAEPP EPR4 report). Scores are presented as a percentage and typically range from 1% to 120% (occasionally higher), with higher scores indicating better asthma control. Note, national asthma guidelines consider \>85% to indicate well controlled asthma.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupSpirometry - FEV1/FVC Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks85.18 percentage of predictedStandard Error 3.35
Parent Intervention GroupSpirometry - FEV1/FVC Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks82.87 percentage of predictedStandard Error 2.39
Secondary

System Usability Scale (Intervention Group Only)

System usability scale - 10 items, 5-point scale to determine perceived usability of a system. To calculate the SUS score, first sum the score contributions from each item. Each item's score contribution will range from 0 to 4. For items 1,3,5,7,and 9 the score contribution is the scale position minus 1. For items 2,4,6,8 and 10, the contribution is 5 minus the scale position. Multiply the sum of the scores by 2.5 to obtain the overall value of SU. Total score may range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher usability. Used only post-intervention.

Time frame: 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Child Intervention GroupSystem Usability Scale (Intervention Group Only)68.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.03
Parent Intervention GroupSystem Usability Scale (Intervention Group Only)62.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026