Skip to content

Vfib by ECG or Echo During Cardiac Arrest

Ventricular Fibrillation and Electrocardiographic Rhythm vs Echocardiographic Rhythm During Cardiac Arrest

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04906252
Acronym
REASON3-2021
Enrollment
813
Registered
2021-05-28
Start date
2021-09-15
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2025-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

Echocardiography, Ultrasound, Ventricular Fibrillation, Vfib

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to measure survival rates associated with patients presenting in cardiac arrest based on their electrocardiographic rhythm and their echocardiographic rhythm. Electrocardiographic rhythm is defined as the rhythm on the ECG and echocardiographic rhythm is the rhythm visualized on bedside ultrasound. Specifically, we will categorize patients based on identical rhythms and dichotomous rhythms with an interest in outcomes in the patient group where their echocardiographic and electrographic rhythms do not match. This is important as current ACLS protocols use electrocardiographic rhythms to determine therapy but limited research implies that therapeutic decisions based on echocardiographic rhythm may produce increased survival. This study will occur during emergency department resuscitation of patients presenting in cardiac arrest. Patients presenting to the emergency department after cardiac arrest will undergo standard resuscitation based on ACLS protocols. Ultrasound imaging will be performed as soon as possible after the patient arrives and digitally recorded, as is currently the standard of care at the institute. Simultaneous recording of the ECG rhythm strip will occur as well. This will be repeated for as many pauses in CPR as is warranted. Each site will record data based on the Utstein nomenclature including patient demographics, arrest details and survival outcomes. Ultrasound images and ECG recordings will be de-identified and submitted to a central database. Data will be uploaded into a centralized database. Statistical analysis will analyze outcomes based on echocardiographic and sonographic findings. Our aim is to measure the survival benefit of treating out of hospital cardiac arrest using echocardiographic rhythm instead of electrocardiographic rhythm.

Detailed description

This is a multi-center, prospective, observational trial involving sites across the United States and Canada. Patients will be enrolled through the emergency department either presenting in cardiac arrest, or going into cardiac arrest while in the emergency department after having arrested out of hospital. Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) protocols and institutional policies for resuscitation will be followed, as is the current standard of care. A patient encounter will conclude upon halting of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patient outcome will be evaluated by chart review or follow-up. Programs involved in this study must have already integrated echocardiography into Cardiac Arrest clinically and have established procedures for how imaging is performed in the context of CPR. Echocardiography will not hinder or impair resuscitative efforts in any way, including halting CPR or prolonging pauses in CPR. Sonographic images will be obtained during designated pauses in chest compressions, as is routine care, during CPR for pulse checks, rhythm checks, and necessary resuscitative procedures. Echocardiography will be performed as appropriate to obtain diagnostic information for each particular patient during resuscitative efforts. Recording of the image loops will be performed during image acquisition according to standard technology availability and clinical protocols at each site. To facilitate image acquisition, the ultrasound probe may be placed in the epigastrium or parasternal region during CPR with the heart centered in the field of view, if it will not interfere with ongoing resuscitation. Recording of the images can begin immediately upon pauses of CPR using whatever means are available at the site. Sonographic images will be obtained by competent personnel with experience in bedside cardiac ultrasound. This information will be made available to the physician taking care of the patient. Continuous ECG tracings are displayed during cardiac arrest, and for the purpose of this study recordings of these ECG tracings will need to be digitally recorded. These digital ECG 'rhythm strips will be matched with contemporaneous recordings of the ultrasound images of the heart. Subject data, with identifiers removed, will be uploaded into the REDcap web-based database. Data will be obtained from initial patient encounter, patient records, and EMS records when available. Contemporaneous digital recordings of ultrasound images and ECG rhythm strips blinded to patient identifiers will be included in a centralized database. Echocardiographic images will be reviewed and interpreted by the central coordinating site blinded to patient information. ECG images will be reviewed and interpreted by the central coordinating site blinded to patient information. Patient cohorts will be compared for the electrical activity by ECG and the myocardial activity by echo.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTEchocardiography

Patients presenting in cardiac arrest will undergo echocardiography as is the standard of care at their institution

Patients presenting in cardiac arrest will undergo an electrocardiogram (ECG) as is the standard of care at their institution

Sponsors

Temple University
CollaboratorOTHER
Stony Brook University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Ottawa
CollaboratorOTHER
ChristianaCare
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Dartmouth College
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Rochester
CollaboratorOTHER
Baystate Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pennsylvania
CollaboratorOTHER
Prisma Health-Midlands
CollaboratorOTHER
Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute)
CollaboratorOTHER
Staten Island University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Manitoba
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Kaweah Delta Health Care District
CollaboratorOTHER
SBH Health System
CollaboratorOTHER
Yale University
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Texas at San Antonio
CollaboratorOTHER
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Arkansas
CollaboratorOTHER
Valleywise Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Kendall Healthcare Group, Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Truman Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
CollaboratorOTHER
Vassar Brothers Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Kansas Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Maine
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
CollaboratorOTHER
Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
University at Buffalo
CollaboratorOTHER
North Shore University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hartford Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Florida
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Maryland
CollaboratorOTHER
Sutter Medical Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Arizona School of Health Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Virginia Commonwealth University
CollaboratorOTHER
Romolo Gaspari
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting in out-of-hospital, atraumatic cardiac arrest

Exclusion criteria

* Resuscitation ended due to end of life decisions * Documented allergy to ultrasound gel * Technical malfunction of ultrasound machine during imaging that prevents use Ultrasound machine unable to record images

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival to Hospital Admissionup to 60 minutesPercentage of patients who survive at the point where they are admitted to the hospital
Rhythm Change post defibrillationup to 60 minutesPercentage of patients who when defibrillated have a change in their cardiac rhythm as reflected by Electrocardiogram (ECG) report

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)up to 60 minutesPercentage of patients who demonstrate return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
Survival to Hospital Dischargeup to discharge, on average 7 daysPercentage of patients who survive at the point where they are discharged from the hospital
Ventricular Fibrillation (VFib) detected via Ultrasound but not detected via Electrocardiogram (ECG)up to 60 minutesThe percentage of patients with Ventricular Fibrillation (VFib)which is detected via ultrasound examination but is not detected via Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026