Multiple Sclerosis
Conditions
Keywords
aerobic exercise, gait
Brief summary
This project will investigate the feasibility and initial efficacy of two aerobic exercise training approaches, forced and voluntary, to improve motor function in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). We hypothesize that intensive aerobic exercise training elicits a neurorepairative and neurorestorative response on the central nervous system, which may improve motor function as it relates to gait and mobility. Should aerobic cycling, forced or voluntary, improve gait and functional mobility in persons with MS, it would serve as a new model to restoring function, rather than current models that focus on compensation.
Detailed description
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system characterized by progressive loss of motor function, cognitive function, in addition to symptoms of fatigue and depression. These motor and non-motor symptoms negatively affect the individuals' walking ability, functional mobility, quality of life, ability to maintain gainful employment, and social engagement. Identifying rehabilitation approaches that may delay disease progression or restore lost neurologic function would have considerable impact in the field. The goal of this project is to investigate the feasibility and initial efficacy of forced or voluntary aerobic exercise training to improve gait, functional mobility, fatigue and quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Current rehabilitative approaches for PwMS focus on training compensatory strategies rather than restoring neurological function. Substantial evidence indicates that aerobic exercise (AE) training has the potential to enhance neurological function by restoring and repairing damaged cells, leading to improvements in gait, balance, and cognitive function in PwMS. Despite evidence of the potential disease-modifying properties of AE, numerous physical, behavioral, and logistical barriers prevent PwMS from achieving and maintaining AE of sufficient intensity and duration to capitalize on the neurophysiologic benefits of training. Forced exercise (FE) is a novel approach to AE training that has been successfully applied to individuals with Parkinson's disease and stroke, in which the voluntary efforts of the individual are augmented, allowing for disease-altering effects of intensive exercise training. During FE, pedaling cadence on a stationary cycle is augmented by a motor to assist, but not replace, the voluntary efforts of the individual. It is hypothesized that PwMS cannot sustain high rates of voluntary exercise necessary to elicit neural repair; therefore, FE is necessary to overcome physical, behavioral and logistical barriers to enhance neuroplasticity to improve gait, QOL, and the ability to participate in life activities. Positive results from our FE trials in Parkinson's disease and stroke have guided us in designing the scientific methodology for the proposed trial in PwMS. Twenty adults with relapsing-remitting MS and mild to moderate gait impairment will be randomized to undergo 1) FE or 2) voluntary aerobic exercise (VE). Both groups will attend 2X/week for 12 weeks. Exercise variables will be collected for each session as a measure of feasibility to determine how PwMS respond to each exercise approach. Clinical, biomechanical, and self-reported outcomes will be gathered prior to, after, and 4-weeks after the intervention to determine the effects of both modes of exercise on spatiotemporal and kinematic characteristics of gait, functional mobility, balance, fatigue, physical activity levels, and quality of life. Should our findings confirm our hypothesis that intensive exercise training can have disease-altering effects, a new direction for MS rehabilitation approaches would ensue, empowering PwMS to take control of their disease to improve function and reduce disability.
Interventions
High-rate aerobic exercise on a semi-recumbent custom-designed stationary cycle ergometer
Voluntary-rate aerobic exercise on a semi-recumbent stationary cycle ergometer
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Group allocation will be concealed to the individual obtaining all outcomes of interest
Intervention model description
rater-blind, prospective randomized trial
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Confirmed diagnosis of RRMS with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 1.5 and 6.5, 2. 18-75 years of age, 3. Deemed minimal risk for cardiovascular event using American College of Sports Medicine Exercise Pre-participation Criteria
Exclusion criteria
1. hospitalization for myocardial infarction, heart failure or heart surgery within 3 months, 2. serious cardiac arrhythmia, 3. hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 4. severe aortic stenosis, 5. pulmonary embolus, 6. significant contractures, 7. dysphagia resulting in inability to sufficiently hydrate, and 8. other contraindication to exercise.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Processing Speed Test | Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions) | Assessment examining processing speed using an tablet-based measure developed to closely resemble the symbol digit modalities test. Participants match symbols to digits over a 2-minute trial. The number of correct matches represents the score, with higher correct matches indicative of better processing speed performance. The low range of possible scoring is 0 with no upper range limit. In a study by Rao and colleagues (2017), persons with MS scored and average of 51.1 (+/- 11.9) on the first trial and 52.8 (+/- 2.0) on the second trial. One trial was conducted in this study. |
| Exercise Duration | collected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks) | Average exercise duration |
| Aerobic Intensity | Collected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks) | average percent max heart rate |
| Exercise Cadence | collected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks) | Average Exercise Cadence (cycling rate) |
| Six Minute Walk Test | Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions) | The distance walked over 6 minutes is measured on an oval walking track |
| Gait Velocity | Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions) | Spatio-temporal and kinematic parameters of gait will be obtained using 3-D motion capture and an instrumented walkway. |
| PROMIS-29 | Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions) | The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in the general population and with individuals living with chronic conditions. Raw scores were converted to T-scores (using an adult referent population) ranging from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in the referent population. For the PROMIS-29 symptom-related domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain interference), higher scores represent greater symptom burden (worse function). For the physical and participation domains, higher scores represent greater levels of function. Pain intensity is scored separately using a 0-10 scaler with higher scores representing greater pain. |
| Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions) | The MFIS is a 21-item self-reported measure of how fatigue impacts the lives of persons with multiple sclerosis. This instrument provides an assessment of the effects of fatigue as it relates to physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. Participants rate on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 = 'Never' to 4 = 'Almost always' their agreement with 21 statements. Total score (0-84) and subscales for physical (0-36), cognitive (0-40) and psychosocial functioning (0-8). Higher numbers indicate greater fatigue in all domains. |
| Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test | Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions) | Assessment examining cognitive and hand function for persons with MS |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Week 1 (exercise session 1), Week 12 (exercise session 24) | Laboratory Assessment: Blood draws will be conducted at 4 different points in time to determine the acute and long-term change in serum Klotho; at week one session one, pre- and post-exercise, and at the last session12-week exercise intervention, pre- and post-exercise. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) The FE group (N=11) completed 45 minutes of FE on the custom-engineered cycle designed to augment pedaling rate to greater than 70 revolutions per minute (RPM's).
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE): High-rate aerobic exercise on a semi-recumbent custom-designed stationary cycle ergometer | 11 |
| Voluntary Aerobic Exercise (VE) The VE group (N=7) completed exercise on an identical semi-recumbent cycle ergometer for 45 minutes at their self-selected cadence without assistance.
Voluntary Aerobic Exercise (VE): Voluntary-rate aerobic exercise on a semi-recumbent stationary cycle ergometer | 7 |
| Total | 18 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Voluntary Aerobic Exercise (VE) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 9 Participants | 7 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 53.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 | 56.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 | 54.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 10 Participants | 7 Participants | 17 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants | 4 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 8 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 12 | 0 / 10 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 12 | 4 / 10 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 12 | 0 / 10 |
Outcome results
Aerobic Intensity
average percent max heart rate
Time frame: Collected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks)
Population: FE + VE groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Aerobic Intensity | 0.63 % Max HR | Standard Deviation 0.07 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Aerobic Intensity | .70 % Max HR | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
Exercise Cadence
Average Exercise Cadence (cycling rate)
Time frame: collected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks)
Population: Completed participants within the FE \& VE groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Exercise Cadence | 69.1 revolutions per minute | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Exercise Cadence | 64.5 revolutions per minute | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
Exercise Duration
Average exercise duration
Time frame: collected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks)
Population: Completed participants in the FE \& VE groups.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Exercise Duration | 42.2 Minutes | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Exercise Duration | 42.2 Minutes | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
Gait Velocity
Spatio-temporal and kinematic parameters of gait will be obtained using 3-D motion capture and an instrumented walkway.
Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)
Population: Data was obtained using a ZENO \& Caren walking pad; however, one participant was unable to complete this outcome measure due to unsteady gait.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Gait Velocity | Zeno Velocity Self-Paced Baseline (average) | 90.6 Meters per second | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Gait Velocity | Zeno Velocity Fast-Paced Baseline (average) | 122.4 Meters per second | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Gait Velocity | CAREN Walking Speed Baseline (Average) | 0.54 Meters per second | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Gait Velocity | Zeno Velocity Self-Paced Baseline (average) | 91.5 Meters per second | Standard Deviation 30.6 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Gait Velocity | Zeno Velocity Fast-Paced Baseline (average) | 131.0 Meters per second | Standard Deviation 13 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Gait Velocity | CAREN Walking Speed Baseline (Average) | 0.65 Meters per second | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)
The MFIS is a 21-item self-reported measure of how fatigue impacts the lives of persons with multiple sclerosis. This instrument provides an assessment of the effects of fatigue as it relates to physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. Participants rate on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 = 'Never' to 4 = 'Almost always' their agreement with 21 statements. Total score (0-84) and subscales for physical (0-36), cognitive (0-40) and psychosocial functioning (0-8). Higher numbers indicate greater fatigue in all domains.
Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)
Population: Each participant completed the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) assessment at baseline. Some participants chose not to complete the EOT questionnaire, hence the overall number of participants for the EOT testing is fewer than the baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS total score at baseline | 21.9 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 18.5 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS total score at EOT | 18.6 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 18.7 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Physical Subscale at baseline | 14.0 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Physical Subscale at EOT | 9.9 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 10.3 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Cognitive Subscale at baseline | 7.6 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Cognitive Subscale at EOT | 7.2 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Psychosocial Subscale at baseline | 2.0 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Psychosocial Subscale at EOT | 1.5 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Psychosocial Subscale at EOT | 1.6 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS total score at baseline | 33.4 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 12.8 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Cognitive Subscale at baseline | 12.3 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS total score at EOT | 20.2 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Psychosocial Subscale at baseline | 2.3 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Physical Subscale at baseline | 18.7 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Cognitive Subscale at EOT | 6.8 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) | MFIS Physical Subscale at EOT | 11.8 score on Likert scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test
Assessment examining cognitive and hand function for persons with MS
Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)
Population: One forced exercise participant was unable to complete the Manual Dexterity test on the left side at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test | Manual Dexterity Test (right) at EOT | 32.4 Time in Seconds | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test | Manual Dexterity Test (Right) at baseline | 31.4 Time in Seconds | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test | Manual Dexterity Test (Left) at baseline | 33.8 Time in Seconds | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test | Manual Dexterity Test (left) at EOT | 35.4 Time in Seconds | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test | Manual Dexterity Test (left) at EOT | 39.6 Time in Seconds | Standard Deviation 35.9 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test | Manual Dexterity Test (Left) at baseline | 25.4 Time in Seconds | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test | Manual Dexterity Test (Right) at baseline | 24.3 Time in Seconds | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test | Manual Dexterity Test (right) at EOT | 23.9 Time in Seconds | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
Processing Speed Test
Assessment examining processing speed using an tablet-based measure developed to closely resemble the symbol digit modalities test. Participants match symbols to digits over a 2-minute trial. The number of correct matches represents the score, with higher correct matches indicative of better processing speed performance. The low range of possible scoring is 0 with no upper range limit. In a study by Rao and colleagues (2017), persons with MS scored and average of 51.1 (+/- 11.9) on the first trial and 52.8 (+/- 2.0) on the second trial. One trial was conducted in this study.
Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)
Population: One participant from the VE group could not complete the processing speed test.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Processing Speed Test | Processing speed test total correct at baseline | 43.0 number correct | Standard Deviation 8 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Processing Speed Test | Processing speed test total correct at EOT | 45.1 number correct | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Processing Speed Test | Processing speed test total correct at baseline | 55.3 number correct | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Processing Speed Test | Processing speed test total correct at EOT | 57.4 number correct | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
PROMIS-29
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in the general population and with individuals living with chronic conditions. Raw scores were converted to T-scores (using an adult referent population) ranging from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in the referent population. For the PROMIS-29 symptom-related domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain interference), higher scores represent greater symptom burden (worse function). For the physical and participation domains, higher scores represent greater levels of function. Pain intensity is scored separately using a 0-10 scaler with higher scores representing greater pain.
Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)
Population: Each participant completed the PROMIS-29 assessment at baseline. Some participants chose not to complete the EOT questionnaire, hence the overall number of participants for the EOT testing is fewer than the baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Fatigue at EOT | 48.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Anxiety at EOT | 45.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at baseline | 43.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Physical at EOT | 40.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at EOT | 42.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.1 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Depression at baseline | 46.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Participation at baseline | 50.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Physical at baseline | 40.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Participation at EOT | 53.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Depression at EOT | 45.7 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Pain Interference at baseline | 52.7 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Anxiety at baseline | 46.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Pain Intensity at baseline | 3.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Fatigue at baseline | 50.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.5 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Pain Intensity at EOT | 2.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Pain Interference at EOT | 46.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Pain Intensity at EOT | 3.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Physical at baseline | 40.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Physical at EOT | 40.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Anxiety at baseline | 49.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Anxiety at EOT | 45.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Depression at baseline | 46.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Depression at EOT | 45.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Fatigue at baseline | 53.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Fatigue at EOT | 47.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at baseline | 45.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at EOT | 44.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.8 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Participation at baseline | 49.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Participation at EOT | 52.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.1 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Pain Interference at EOT | 50.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Pain Intensity at baseline | 4.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | PROMIS-29 | PROMIS Pain Interference at baseline | 54.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.2 |
Six Minute Walk Test
The distance walked over 6 minutes is measured on an oval walking track
Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)
Population: Week (0) Baseline + EOT Week (13)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Six Minute Walk Test | Baseline | 339.1 Meters | Standard Deviation 123.3 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | Six Minute Walk Test | EOT | 338.3 Meters | Standard Deviation 111.5 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Six Minute Walk Test | Baseline | 345.9 Meters | Standard Deviation 110.7 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | Six Minute Walk Test | EOT | 373.6 Meters | Standard Deviation 128.6 |
To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.
Laboratory Assessment: Blood draws will be conducted at 4 different points in time to determine the acute and long-term change in serum Klotho; at week one session one, pre- and post-exercise, and at the last session12-week exercise intervention, pre- and post-exercise.
Time frame: Week 1 (exercise session 1), Week 12 (exercise session 24)
Population: Participants in this data set have completed the entire 12 weeks of the prescribed exercise session.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Klotho (Baseline Post-Exercise) | 929.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 661.1 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Klotho (Final Session post-exercise) | 1265.8 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 940.2 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Klotho (Baseline Pre-Exercise) | 1273.3 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 787.7 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Neurofilament light (Baseline) | 14.6 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 7.5 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Klotho (Final Session pre-exercise) | 948.3 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 550.2 |
| Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Neurofilament light (Final Session) | 16.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Neurofilament light (Final Session) | 15.0 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Klotho (Baseline Pre-Exercise) | 1100.4 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 878 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Klotho (Baseline Post-Exercise) | 1166.4 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 745.4 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Klotho (Final Session pre-exercise) | 1019.4 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 608.7 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Klotho (Final Session post-exercise) | 154.4 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1104.1 |
| Voluntary Exercise (VE) | To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection. | Neurofilament light (Baseline) | 14.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 7.3 |