Skip to content

The Therapeutic Effects of Forced Aerobic Exercise in Multiple Sclerosis

The Therapeutic Effects of Forced Aerobic Exercise in Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04906057
Enrollment
22
Registered
2021-05-28
Start date
2021-07-06
Completion date
2022-11-29
Last updated
2025-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

aerobic exercise, gait

Brief summary

This project will investigate the feasibility and initial efficacy of two aerobic exercise training approaches, forced and voluntary, to improve motor function in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). We hypothesize that intensive aerobic exercise training elicits a neurorepairative and neurorestorative response on the central nervous system, which may improve motor function as it relates to gait and mobility. Should aerobic cycling, forced or voluntary, improve gait and functional mobility in persons with MS, it would serve as a new model to restoring function, rather than current models that focus on compensation.

Detailed description

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system characterized by progressive loss of motor function, cognitive function, in addition to symptoms of fatigue and depression. These motor and non-motor symptoms negatively affect the individuals' walking ability, functional mobility, quality of life, ability to maintain gainful employment, and social engagement. Identifying rehabilitation approaches that may delay disease progression or restore lost neurologic function would have considerable impact in the field. The goal of this project is to investigate the feasibility and initial efficacy of forced or voluntary aerobic exercise training to improve gait, functional mobility, fatigue and quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Current rehabilitative approaches for PwMS focus on training compensatory strategies rather than restoring neurological function. Substantial evidence indicates that aerobic exercise (AE) training has the potential to enhance neurological function by restoring and repairing damaged cells, leading to improvements in gait, balance, and cognitive function in PwMS. Despite evidence of the potential disease-modifying properties of AE, numerous physical, behavioral, and logistical barriers prevent PwMS from achieving and maintaining AE of sufficient intensity and duration to capitalize on the neurophysiologic benefits of training. Forced exercise (FE) is a novel approach to AE training that has been successfully applied to individuals with Parkinson's disease and stroke, in which the voluntary efforts of the individual are augmented, allowing for disease-altering effects of intensive exercise training. During FE, pedaling cadence on a stationary cycle is augmented by a motor to assist, but not replace, the voluntary efforts of the individual. It is hypothesized that PwMS cannot sustain high rates of voluntary exercise necessary to elicit neural repair; therefore, FE is necessary to overcome physical, behavioral and logistical barriers to enhance neuroplasticity to improve gait, QOL, and the ability to participate in life activities. Positive results from our FE trials in Parkinson's disease and stroke have guided us in designing the scientific methodology for the proposed trial in PwMS. Twenty adults with relapsing-remitting MS and mild to moderate gait impairment will be randomized to undergo 1) FE or 2) voluntary aerobic exercise (VE). Both groups will attend 2X/week for 12 weeks. Exercise variables will be collected for each session as a measure of feasibility to determine how PwMS respond to each exercise approach. Clinical, biomechanical, and self-reported outcomes will be gathered prior to, after, and 4-weeks after the intervention to determine the effects of both modes of exercise on spatiotemporal and kinematic characteristics of gait, functional mobility, balance, fatigue, physical activity levels, and quality of life. Should our findings confirm our hypothesis that intensive exercise training can have disease-altering effects, a new direction for MS rehabilitation approaches would ensue, empowering PwMS to take control of their disease to improve function and reduce disability.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALForced Aerobic Exercise (FE)

High-rate aerobic exercise on a semi-recumbent custom-designed stationary cycle ergometer

BEHAVIORALVoluntary Aerobic Exercise (VE)

Voluntary-rate aerobic exercise on a semi-recumbent stationary cycle ergometer

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Group allocation will be concealed to the individual obtaining all outcomes of interest

Intervention model description

rater-blind, prospective randomized trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Confirmed diagnosis of RRMS with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between 1.5 and 6.5, 2. 18-75 years of age, 3. Deemed minimal risk for cardiovascular event using American College of Sports Medicine Exercise Pre-participation Criteria

Exclusion criteria

1. hospitalization for myocardial infarction, heart failure or heart surgery within 3 months, 2. serious cardiac arrhythmia, 3. hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 4. severe aortic stenosis, 5. pulmonary embolus, 6. significant contractures, 7. dysphagia resulting in inability to sufficiently hydrate, and 8. other contraindication to exercise.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Processing Speed TestWeek 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)Assessment examining processing speed using an tablet-based measure developed to closely resemble the symbol digit modalities test. Participants match symbols to digits over a 2-minute trial. The number of correct matches represents the score, with higher correct matches indicative of better processing speed performance. The low range of possible scoring is 0 with no upper range limit. In a study by Rao and colleagues (2017), persons with MS scored and average of 51.1 (+/- 11.9) on the first trial and 52.8 (+/- 2.0) on the second trial. One trial was conducted in this study.
Exercise Durationcollected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks)Average exercise duration
Aerobic IntensityCollected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks)average percent max heart rate
Exercise Cadencecollected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks)Average Exercise Cadence (cycling rate)
Six Minute Walk TestWeek 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)The distance walked over 6 minutes is measured on an oval walking track
Gait VelocityWeek 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)Spatio-temporal and kinematic parameters of gait will be obtained using 3-D motion capture and an instrumented walkway.
PROMIS-29Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in the general population and with individuals living with chronic conditions. Raw scores were converted to T-scores (using an adult referent population) ranging from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in the referent population. For the PROMIS-29 symptom-related domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain interference), higher scores represent greater symptom burden (worse function). For the physical and participation domains, higher scores represent greater levels of function. Pain intensity is scored separately using a 0-10 scaler with higher scores representing greater pain.
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)The MFIS is a 21-item self-reported measure of how fatigue impacts the lives of persons with multiple sclerosis. This instrument provides an assessment of the effects of fatigue as it relates to physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. Participants rate on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 = 'Never' to 4 = 'Almost always' their agreement with 21 statements. Total score (0-84) and subscales for physical (0-36), cognitive (0-40) and psychosocial functioning (0-8). Higher numbers indicate greater fatigue in all domains.
Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity TestWeek 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)Assessment examining cognitive and hand function for persons with MS

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Week 1 (exercise session 1), Week 12 (exercise session 24)Laboratory Assessment: Blood draws will be conducted at 4 different points in time to determine the acute and long-term change in serum Klotho; at week one session one, pre- and post-exercise, and at the last session12-week exercise intervention, pre- and post-exercise.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)
The FE group (N=11) completed 45 minutes of FE on the custom-engineered cycle designed to augment pedaling rate to greater than 70 revolutions per minute (RPM's). Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE): High-rate aerobic exercise on a semi-recumbent custom-designed stationary cycle ergometer
11
Voluntary Aerobic Exercise (VE)
The VE group (N=7) completed exercise on an identical semi-recumbent cycle ergometer for 45 minutes at their self-selected cadence without assistance. Voluntary Aerobic Exercise (VE): Voluntary-rate aerobic exercise on a semi-recumbent stationary cycle ergometer
7
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicForced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Voluntary Aerobic Exercise (VE)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Age, Continuous53.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants7 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 124 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 120 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Aerobic Intensity

average percent max heart rate

Time frame: Collected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks)

Population: FE + VE groups

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Aerobic Intensity0.63 % Max HRStandard Deviation 0.07
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Aerobic Intensity.70 % Max HRStandard Deviation 0.05
Primary

Exercise Cadence

Average Exercise Cadence (cycling rate)

Time frame: collected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks)

Population: Completed participants within the FE \& VE groups

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Exercise Cadence69.1 revolutions per minuteStandard Deviation 11.1
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Exercise Cadence64.5 revolutions per minuteStandard Deviation 16.7
Primary

Exercise Duration

Average exercise duration

Time frame: collected during each exercise session (twice per week for 12 weeks)

Population: Completed participants in the FE \& VE groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Exercise Duration42.2 MinutesStandard Deviation 2.4
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Exercise Duration42.2 MinutesStandard Deviation 2.4
Primary

Gait Velocity

Spatio-temporal and kinematic parameters of gait will be obtained using 3-D motion capture and an instrumented walkway.

Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)

Population: Data was obtained using a ZENO \& Caren walking pad; however, one participant was unable to complete this outcome measure due to unsteady gait.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Gait VelocityZeno Velocity Self-Paced Baseline (average)90.6 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 17.3
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Gait VelocityZeno Velocity Fast-Paced Baseline (average)122.4 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 19.3
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Gait VelocityCAREN Walking Speed Baseline (Average)0.54 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.28
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Gait VelocityZeno Velocity Self-Paced Baseline (average)91.5 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 30.6
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Gait VelocityZeno Velocity Fast-Paced Baseline (average)131.0 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 13
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Gait VelocityCAREN Walking Speed Baseline (Average)0.65 Meters per secondStandard Deviation 0.3
Primary

Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)

The MFIS is a 21-item self-reported measure of how fatigue impacts the lives of persons with multiple sclerosis. This instrument provides an assessment of the effects of fatigue as it relates to physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. Participants rate on a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 = 'Never' to 4 = 'Almost always' their agreement with 21 statements. Total score (0-84) and subscales for physical (0-36), cognitive (0-40) and psychosocial functioning (0-8). Higher numbers indicate greater fatigue in all domains.

Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)

Population: Each participant completed the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) assessment at baseline. Some participants chose not to complete the EOT questionnaire, hence the overall number of participants for the EOT testing is fewer than the baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS total score at baseline21.9 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 18.5
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS total score at EOT18.6 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 18.7
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Physical Subscale at baseline14.0 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Physical Subscale at EOT9.9 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Cognitive Subscale at baseline7.6 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Cognitive Subscale at EOT7.2 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Psychosocial Subscale at baseline2.0 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Psychosocial Subscale at EOT1.5 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Psychosocial Subscale at EOT1.6 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS total score at baseline33.4 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 12.8
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Cognitive Subscale at baseline12.3 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS total score at EOT20.2 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Psychosocial Subscale at baseline2.3 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Physical Subscale at baseline18.7 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Cognitive Subscale at EOT6.8 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS)MFIS Physical Subscale at EOT11.8 score on Likert scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Primary

Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity Test

Assessment examining cognitive and hand function for persons with MS

Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)

Population: One forced exercise participant was unable to complete the Manual Dexterity test on the left side at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity TestManual Dexterity Test (right) at EOT32.4 Time in SecondsStandard Deviation 7.8
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity TestManual Dexterity Test (Right) at baseline31.4 Time in SecondsStandard Deviation 8.2
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity TestManual Dexterity Test (Left) at baseline33.8 Time in SecondsStandard Deviation 5.8
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity TestManual Dexterity Test (left) at EOT35.4 Time in SecondsStandard Deviation 9.8
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity TestManual Dexterity Test (left) at EOT39.6 Time in SecondsStandard Deviation 35.9
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity TestManual Dexterity Test (Left) at baseline25.4 Time in SecondsStandard Deviation 2
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity TestManual Dexterity Test (Right) at baseline24.3 Time in SecondsStandard Deviation 4.1
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Multiple Sclerosis Manual Dexterity TestManual Dexterity Test (right) at EOT23.9 Time in SecondsStandard Deviation 4.4
Primary

Processing Speed Test

Assessment examining processing speed using an tablet-based measure developed to closely resemble the symbol digit modalities test. Participants match symbols to digits over a 2-minute trial. The number of correct matches represents the score, with higher correct matches indicative of better processing speed performance. The low range of possible scoring is 0 with no upper range limit. In a study by Rao and colleagues (2017), persons with MS scored and average of 51.1 (+/- 11.9) on the first trial and 52.8 (+/- 2.0) on the second trial. One trial was conducted in this study.

Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)

Population: One participant from the VE group could not complete the processing speed test.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Processing Speed TestProcessing speed test total correct at baseline43.0 number correctStandard Deviation 8
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Processing Speed TestProcessing speed test total correct at EOT45.1 number correctStandard Deviation 9.4
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Processing Speed TestProcessing speed test total correct at baseline55.3 number correctStandard Deviation 8.5
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Processing Speed TestProcessing speed test total correct at EOT57.4 number correctStandard Deviation 9.8
Primary

PROMIS-29

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in the general population and with individuals living with chronic conditions. Raw scores were converted to T-scores (using an adult referent population) ranging from 0-100 with a mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10 in the referent population. For the PROMIS-29 symptom-related domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain interference), higher scores represent greater symptom burden (worse function). For the physical and participation domains, higher scores represent greater levels of function. Pain intensity is scored separately using a 0-10 scaler with higher scores representing greater pain.

Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)

Population: Each participant completed the PROMIS-29 assessment at baseline. Some participants chose not to complete the EOT questionnaire, hence the overall number of participants for the EOT testing is fewer than the baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Fatigue at EOT48.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Anxiety at EOT45.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at baseline43.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Physical at EOT40.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at EOT42.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Depression at baseline46.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Participation at baseline50.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Physical at baseline40.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Participation at EOT53.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Depression at EOT45.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Pain Interference at baseline52.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Anxiety at baseline46.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Pain Intensity at baseline3.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Fatigue at baseline50.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Pain Intensity at EOT2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Pain Interference at EOT46.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Pain Intensity at EOT3.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Physical at baseline40.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Physical at EOT40.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Anxiety at baseline49.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Anxiety at EOT45.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Depression at baseline46.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Depression at EOT45.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Fatigue at baseline53.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Fatigue at EOT47.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at baseline45.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at EOT44.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Participation at baseline49.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Participation at EOT52.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Pain Interference at EOT50.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.7
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Pain Intensity at baseline4.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Voluntary Exercise (VE)PROMIS-29PROMIS Pain Interference at baseline54.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Primary

Six Minute Walk Test

The distance walked over 6 minutes is measured on an oval walking track

Time frame: Week 0 (baseline), Week 13 (post exercise sessions)

Population: Week (0) Baseline + EOT Week (13)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Six Minute Walk TestBaseline339.1 MetersStandard Deviation 123.3
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)Six Minute Walk TestEOT338.3 MetersStandard Deviation 111.5
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Six Minute Walk TestBaseline345.9 MetersStandard Deviation 110.7
Voluntary Exercise (VE)Six Minute Walk TestEOT373.6 MetersStandard Deviation 128.6
Secondary

To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.

Laboratory Assessment: Blood draws will be conducted at 4 different points in time to determine the acute and long-term change in serum Klotho; at week one session one, pre- and post-exercise, and at the last session12-week exercise intervention, pre- and post-exercise.

Time frame: Week 1 (exercise session 1), Week 12 (exercise session 24)

Population: Participants in this data set have completed the entire 12 weeks of the prescribed exercise session.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Klotho (Baseline Post-Exercise)929.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 661.1
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Klotho (Final Session post-exercise)1265.8 pg/mLStandard Deviation 940.2
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Klotho (Baseline Pre-Exercise)1273.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 787.7
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Neurofilament light (Baseline)14.6 pg/mLStandard Deviation 7.5
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Klotho (Final Session pre-exercise)948.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 550.2
Forced Aerobic Exercise (FE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Neurofilament light (Final Session)16.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 6.4
Voluntary Exercise (VE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Neurofilament light (Final Session)15.0 pg/mLStandard Deviation 4
Voluntary Exercise (VE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Klotho (Baseline Pre-Exercise)1100.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 878
Voluntary Exercise (VE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Klotho (Baseline Post-Exercise)1166.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 745.4
Voluntary Exercise (VE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Klotho (Final Session pre-exercise)1019.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 608.7
Voluntary Exercise (VE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Klotho (Final Session post-exercise)154.4 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1104.1
Voluntary Exercise (VE)To Investigate the Role of Klotho in Promoting Neuroprotection.Neurofilament light (Baseline)14.5 pg/mLStandard Deviation 7.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026